Impact of opioid-free analgesia on pain severity and patient satisfaction after discharge from surgery: multispecialty, prospective cohort study in 25 countries

Background: Balancing opioid stewardship and the need for adequate analgesia following discharge after surgery is challenging. This study aimed to compare the outcomes for patients discharged with opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after common surgical procedures.Methods: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study collected data from patients undergoing common acute and elective general surgical, urological, gynaecological, and orthopaedic procedures. The primary outcomes were patient-reported time in severe pain measured on a numerical analogue scale from 0 to 100% and patient-reported satisfaction with pain relief during the first week following discharge. Data were collected by in-hospital chart review and patient telephone interview 1 week after discharge.Results: The study recruited 4273 patients from 144 centres in 25 countries; 1311 patients (30.7%) were prescribed opioid analgesia at discharge. Patients reported being in severe pain for 10 (i.q.r. 1-30)% of the first week after discharge and rated satisfaction with analgesia as 90 (i.q.r. 80-100) of 100. After adjustment for confounders, opioid analgesia on discharge was independently associated with increased pain severity (risk ratio 1.52, 95% c.i. 1.31 to 1.76; P < 0.001) and re-presentation to healthcare providers owing to side-effects of medication (OR 2.38, 95% c.i. 1.36 to 4.17; P = 0.004), but not with satisfaction with analgesia (beta coefficient 0.92, 95% c.i. -1.52 to 3.36; P = 0.468) compared with opioid-free analgesia. Although opioid prescribing varied greatly between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, patient-reported outcomes did not.Conclusion: Opioid analgesia prescription on surgical discharge is associated with a higher risk of re-presentation owing to side-effects of medication and increased patient-reported pain, but not with changes in patient-reported satisfaction. Opioid-free discharge analgesia should be adopted routinely

Análise epidemiológica das pericardiotomias realizadas em um hospital universitário de Curitiba

OBJETIVO: Analisar epidemiologicamente a utilização da janela pericárdica(JP) no diagnóstico de lesão cardíaca em um hospital universitário de trauma de Curitiba. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional, retrospectivo, de análise dos prontuários de pacientes que foram submetidos a pericardiotomia por trauma contuso ou penetrante, no período de seis anos, no serviço de Urgência e Emergência do Hospital Universitário Cajuru. RESULTADOS: 120 pacientes foram submetidos à Janela Pericárdica no período acima referido. A faixa etária variou de 15 a 80 anos, sendo a maior prevalência entre os 20 a 30 anos (49,7%), 105(87,5%) pacientes eram homens e 15(12,5%) mulheres. Os traumas fechados foram 14(11,67%) e penetrantes 105(87,5%). Dos penetrantes, 41 foram por ferida de arma branca, 60 por ferida de arma de fogo e quatro por ambas. Quanto à localização das lesões: 47,5% foram precordiais, 34,16% em transição tóraco-abdominal, 5,0% em ambas e 13,33% em outras localizações. Das JP realizadas, 72,5% foram negativas e 27,5% positivas. Dentre as positivas, as lesões cardíacas encontradas foram: átrio direito 21,2%, ventrículo direito 30,3%, ventrículo esquerdo 24,2%, aorta ascendente 3%, nenhuma lesão 21,2%. Houve 35 óbitos: 18 deles até 24hs e 17 após 24hs. CONCLUSÃO: A janela pericárdica foi mais realizada em homens jovens com ferimentos penetrantes por arma de fogo, em sua maioria com lesão do ventrículo direito como principal achado, concordando com a literatura revisada