Attitudes towards microbicide use for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy

Background Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common reproductive tract infection (RTI) and is a significant risk factor for preterm birth. Microbicides could be an option for the prevention and treatment of BV in pregnancy, and understanding use of the product will be crucial. The present study explored attitudes of women in the third trimester of pregnancy regarding topical microbicide use for the prevention and treatment of BV. METHODS: Twenty-six women in their third trimester were interviewed regarding their knowledge and beliefs about RTIs during pregnancy and attitudes concerning the use of topical microbicides for prevention and treatment of BV. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 24.9 years, were largely under-represented minorities and the majority had had past pregnancies. Participants had knowledge and experience with RTIs but not BV. They were open to the use of microbicides for prevention or treatment of BV, but believed that women requiring treatment would be more motivated. Rationales for acceptability were most commonly related to the baby's health. Practical issues that may interfere with use were often, but not always, related to pregnancy. There was a range of attitudes about partner involvement in decision-making and the practicalities of product use. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women are knowledgeable about RTIs but not necessarily BV. The women in this study found microbicide use acceptable, particularly for treatment. To improve acceptability and use, education would be needed about BV and possible complications, how to overcome practical problems and the value of involving partners in the decision

Selective use of ultrasonography for acute appendicitis in children.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of ultrasonography in children with equivocal signs of acute appendicitis, and correlate with initial clinical impression and pathological findings. METHODS: This is a prospective evaluation of all children presenting with a possible diagnosis of appendicitis during a 14-month study period. Patients with unequivocal clinical signs of appendicitis underwent appendectomy without ultrasonography. Patients with equivocal signs had documentation of the clinical impression and subsequent abdominal ultrasound. Statistical analysis of results was performed using the chi-square test (P RESULTS: Two hundred fifteen consecutive children were enrolled. Signs were unequivocal in 116 and equivocal in 99. Seven patients in the first group had a normal appendix at operation. Of the 99 patients with equivocal signs, there were 28 true positives, 3 false positives, 64 true negatives, and 4 false negatives. In equivocal cases, sensitivity of the initial clinical impression versus ultrasound was 50% and 88%, respectively (P CONCLUSIONS: The low false positive rate (6%) in clinically obvious cases of appendicitis does not, in our opinion, warrant ultrasonography. In clinically equivocal cases, ultrasonography is a fast, sensitive, and specific diagnostic modality to diagnose or rule out appendicitis, avoiding the need for prolonged observation and/or hospitalization

III Edizione di "Leggiamoci con cura. Scrittura e narrazione di s\ue9 in medicina"

Il volume raccoglie gli Atti della III Edizione del Convegno di Medicina Narrativa organizzato, il 24 ottobre 2013, dall'IRCCS (Istituto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) CRO (Centro di Riferimento Oncologico) di Aviano (Pordenone). Fra gli altri vi sono due contributi di medici (Catallozzi, pp. 75-84) e studenti (Slater, pp. 108-113) della Facolt\ue0 di Medicina della Columbia University di New York