Revisiting the association between childhood trauma and psychosis in bipolar disorder:A quasi-dimensional path-analysis

International audienceBackground: Childhood trauma has been associated with a more severe clinical expression of bipolar disorder (BD). However, the results that specifically associated traumatic events and psychotic features in BD have been inconsistent, possibly due to the low resolution of the phenotypes being used.Methods: 270 normothymic patients with BD completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and the Peters Delusion Inventory (PDI) that assessed 21 delusional beliefs. Patients were characterized for the lifetime presence of psychotic features during episodes and cannabis misuse in accordance with DSM-IV. We performed a series of path analyses to investigate the links from three types of childhood abuse (physical, sexual and emotional) directly to delusional beliefs and psychotic features, and indirectly through cannabis misuse.Results: A first path analysis showed no link between any of the childhood abuse types and psychotic features when only a categorical definition of psychosis was used. When incorporating the quasi-dimensional measure of delusional beliefs in a second path analysis, we found that emotional and physical abuse and cannabis misuse were each directly associated with PDI score. PDI score and psychotic features were strongly correlated. Childhood abuse did not operate through cannabis misuse to increase delusional beliefs. Including type of BD in the model did not alter the results.Conclusion: Emotional and physical abuse, but also cannabis misuse, increased delusional beliefs in patients with BD. Using a quasi-dimensional measure of psychotic symptoms in BD provided higher resolution of the psychosis phenotype and helped reconcile ambiguous findings from previous studies

Emotional dysfunction as a marker of bipolar disorders

BACKGROUND: Assessment of emotional reactivity, defined as rapid emotional responses to salient environmental events, has been neglected in mood disorders. This article reviews data showing the relevance of using emotional reactivity to better characterize bipolar mood episodes. METHOD: We reviewed clinical data on emotional reactivity during all phases of bipolar disorders (euthymic, manic, mixed and depressive states) and brain-imaging, neurochemical, genetic studies related to emotional reactivity disturbances. RESULT: Euthymic bipolar patients show mild abnormalities (hypersensitivity to emotional stimuli and higher arousability) in comparison to controls. Both manic and mixed states are characterized by a significant increase in emotional reactivity. Furthermore, emotional reactivity may discriminate between two types of bipolar depression, the first being characterized by emotional hypo-reactivity and global behavioral inhibition, the second by emotional hyper-reactivity. Brain-imaging studies can help to identify the underlying mechanisms involved in disturbances of emotional reactivity. CONCLUSION: Emotional reactivity can be used to refine more homogeneous pathophysiological subtypes of mood episodes. Future research should explore possible correlations between biomarkers, response to treatments and these clinical phenotypes

Affect intensity measure in bipolar disorders: A multidimensional approach

International audienceBackground: Emotional dysregulation, characterized by high levels of both arousal and intensity of emotional responses, is a core feature of bipolar disorders (BDs). In non-clinical populations, the 40-item Affect Intensity Measure (AIM) can be used to assess the different dimensions of emotional reactivity.Methods: We analyzed the factor structure of the AIM in a sample of 310 euthymic patients with BD using Principal Component Analysis and examined associations between AIM sub-scale scores and demographic and illness characteristics.Results: The French translation of the AIM demonstrated good reliability. A four-factor solution similar to that reported in non-clinical samples (Positive Affectivity, Unpeacefulness [lack of Serenity], Negative Reactivity, Negative Intensity), explained 47% of the total variance. Age and gender were associated with Unpeacefulness and Negative reactivity respectively. 'Unpeacefulness' was also positively associated with psychotic symptoms at onset (p=0.0006), but negatively associated with co-morbid substance misuse (p=0.008). Negative Intensity was positively associated with social phobia (p=0.0005).Limitations: We cannot definitively exclude a lack of statistical power to classify all AIM items. Euthymia was carefully defined, but a degree of 'contamination' of the self-reported levels of emotion reactivity may occur because of subsyndromal BD symptoms. It was not feasible to control for the possible impact of on-going treatments.Conclusions: The AIM scale appears to be a useful measure of emotional reactivity and intensity in a clinical sample of patients with BD, suggesting it can be used in addition to other markers of BD characteristics and sub-types