Eotaxin-1 (CCL11) up-regulation in tears during seasonal allergic conjunctivitis

Purpose: To compare in-season eotaxin-1 levels in tears of patients suffering from seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) with (1) tears of normal subjects and (2) tears of SAC patients out of season. Methods: Tears of 11 SAC patients and six control volunteers were collected during the pollen season. Tears of five SAC patients showing a strong sensitivity to grass pollen (skin-prick tests and specific serum IgE) were collected both in season and out of season. ELISA measured eotaxin-1 level. Results: Eotaxin-1 concentration in tears of SAC patients [2,100±503 (SEM)pg/ml] and normal subjects (1,193±176pg/ml) were significantly different (P=0.0049). Regarding allergic patients, the clinical score (sum of five allergic criteria) was significantly different in season and out of season (P=0.0043) as was also the case with eotaxin-1 concentration (P=0.024). Conclusions: The eotaxin-1 concentration in tears of patients showing hay fever could confirm a diagnosis of seasonal ocular allerg

The Synthetic Plasmodium falciparum Circumsporozoite Peptide PfCS102 as a Malaria Vaccine Candidate: A Randomized Controlled Phase I Trial

BACKGROUND: Fully efficient vaccines against malaria pre-erythrocytic stage are still lacking. The objective of this dose/adjuvant-finding study was to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a vaccine candidate based on a peptide spanning the C-terminal region of Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein (PfCS102) in malaria naive adults. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Thirty-six healthy malaria-naive adults were randomly distributed into three dose blocks (10, 30 and 100 microg) and vaccinated with PfCS102 in combination with either Montanide ISA 720 or GSK proprietary Adjuvant System AS02A at days 0, 60, and 180. Primary end-point (safety and reactogenicity) was based on the frequency of adverse events (AE) and of abnormal biological safety tests; secondary-end point (immunogenicity) on P. falciparum specific cell-mediated immunity and antibody response before and after immunization. The two adjuvant formulations were well tolerated and their safety profile was good. Most AEs were local and, when systemic, involved mainly fatigue and headache. Half the volunteers in AS02A groups experienced severe AEs (mainly erythema). After the third injection, 34 of 35 volunteers developed anti-PfCS102 and anti-sporozoite antibodies, and 28 of 35 demonstrated T-cell proliferative responses and IFN-gamma production. Five of 22 HLA-A2 and HLA-A3 volunteers displayed PfCS102 specific IFN-gamma secreting CD8(+) T cell responses. Responses were only marginally boosted after the 3(rd) vaccination and remained stable for 6 months. For both adjuvants, the dose of 10 microg was less immunogenic in comparison to 30 and 100 microg that induced similar responses. AS02A formulations with 30 microg or 100 microg PfCS102 induced about 10-folds higher antibody and IFN-gamma responses than Montanide formulations. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: PfCS102 peptide was safe and highly immunogenic, allowing the design of more advanced trials to test its potential for protection. Two or three immunizations with a dose of 30 microg formulated with AS02A appeared the most appropriate choice for such studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Swissmedic.ch 2002 DR 1227

Phase I Malaria Vaccine Trial with a Long Synthetic Peptide Derived from the Merozoite Surface Protein 3 Antigen

The C-terminal conserved region of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 3 (MSP3) is the trigger antigen of a protective immune response mediated by cytophilic antibodies. In an open, randomized, two-adjuvant (Montanide ISA 720, aluminum hydroxide) phase I clinical trial we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of increasing doses of a long synthetic peptide construct spanning the conserved region of MSP3 targeted by biologically active antibodies (MSP3-LSP). Thirty-five healthy volunteers were randomized to receive three subcutaneous injections on days 0, 30, and 120. Of the 100 injections given, 10 caused severe local reactions, 62 caused transient mild to moderate local reactions, and 28 caused no reaction. On the basis of preestablished exclusion criteria, use of the Montanide formulation led to withdrawal of five volunteers after the second injection. This led to a reduction in the subsequent vaccine doses in four of the groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred throughout the trial. After the third injection, volunteers displayed a marked specific anti-MSP3-LSP antibody response (23/30 individuals, compared with 29/34 individuals for plasma from an area where malaria is endemic), an anti-native MSP3 antibody response (19/30 individuals), a T-cell-antigen-specific proliferative response (26/30 individuals), and gamma interferon production (25/30 individuals). In conclusion, the MSP3-LSP vaccine was immunogenic with both adjuvants, although it was unacceptably reactogenic when it was combined with Montanide. The potential usefulness of the candidate vaccine is supported by the induction of a strong cytophilic response (i.e., the type of anti-MSP3 antibodies involved in antibody-dependent, monocyte-mediated protective mechanisms in areas where malaria is endemic)

Eotaxin-1 (CCL11) up-regulation in tears during seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: To compare in-season eotaxin-1 levels in tears of patients suffering from seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) with (1) tears of normal subjects and (2) tears of SAC patients out of season. METHODS: Tears of 11 SAC patients and six control volunteers were collected during the pollen season. Tears of five SAC patients showing a strong sensitivity to grass pollen (skin-prick tests and specific serum IgE) were collected both in season and out of season. ELISA measured eotaxin-1 level. RESULTS: Eotaxin-1 concentration in tears of SAC patients [2,100+/-503 (SEM) pg/ml] and normal subjects (1,193+/-176 pg/ml) were significantly different (P=0.0049). Regarding allergic patients, the clinical score (sum of five allergic criteria) was significantly different in season and out of season (P=0.0043) as was also the case with eotaxin-1 concentration (P=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The eotaxin-1 concentration in tears of patients showing hay fever could confirm a diagnosis of seasonal ocular allergy