Analysis of neuroretinal rim distribution and vascular pattern in eyes with presumed large physiological cupping: a comparative study

Background: To investigate possible differences in neuroretinal rim distribution, vascular pattern, and peripapillary region appearance between eyes with presumed large physiological optic disc cupping (pLPC) and eyes with minimal optic disc excavation.Methods: We prospectively enrolled consecutive subjects with pLPC and individuals with minimal excavation (optic disc excavation within normal limits; control group). All eyes had normal visual fields and untreated intraocular pressure (IOP) = 0.6 and >= 30 months of follow-up with no evidence of glaucomatous neuropathy. for controls, VCDR was limited to <= 0.5. We compared ocular signs and characteristics related to the neuroretinal rim distribution, vascular pattern, peripapillary region appearance and disc size between groups. Whenever both eyes were eligible, one was randomly selected for analysis.Results: A total of 74 patients (mean age, 45.6 +/- 14.9 years) with pLPC and 45 controls (mean age, 44.8 +/- 11.6 years) were enrolled (p = 0.76). Median disc size and VCDR was significantly larger in eyes with pLPC compared to controls (p < 0.01). the proportion of eyes with violation of the ISNT rule, laminar dot sign, nasal shifting of the central vessels, nasal excavation and baring of circumlinear vessel was significantly greater in the eyes with pLPC compared to controls (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences regarding the proportions of eyes with peripapillary atrophy between groups (p < 0.09). Finally, disc size was significantly associated with VCDR (r(2) = 0.47, p < 0.01), with an increase of 0.21 in VCDR for each 1 mm(2) in disc area.Conclusion: Compared to normal controls, eyes with pLPC may present a higher proportion of optic nerve head findings frequently observed in glaucomatous eyes. This seems to be explained in part by the larger discs found in these eyes. We believe care should be taken while classifying them as glaucomatous or not based solely on these characteristics.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, BR-04021001 São Paulo, BrazilHosp Med Olhos, Glaucoma Unit, BR-06018180 Osasco, SP, BrazilMayo Clin, Dept Ophthalmol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, BR-04021001 São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc

Mecanismos de fechamento angular sem bloqueio pupilar: análise de prevalência e resultados terapêuticos

Purpose: To assess the prevalence and treatment outcomes of angle-closure mechanisms other than pupillary block in a population of Brazilian patients.Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate patients who had undergone laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) due to occludable angles at a single institution between July 2009 and April 2012. An occludable angle was defined as an eye in which the posterior trabecular meshwork was not visible for >= 180 degrees on dark-room gonioscopy. Key exclusion criteria were any form of secondary glaucoma and the presence of >90 degrees of peripheral anterior synechiae. Collected data were age, race, gender, angle-closure mechanism (based on indentation goniocopy and ultrasound biomicroscopy), intraocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications and subsequent management during follow-up. If both eyes were eligible, the right eye was arbitrarily selected for analysis.Results: A total of 196 eyes of 196 consecutive patients (mean age 58.3 +/- 11.6 years) who underwent LPI were included. in most of the patients [86% (169 patients; 133 women and 36 men]), LPI sucessfully opened the angle. Mean IOP was reduced from 18.3 +/- 6.4 mmHg to 15.4 +/- 4.5 mmHg after LPI (p<0.01). Among the 27 patients with persistent occludable angles, the most common underlying mechanisms were plateau iris (56%) and lens-induced component (34%). Most of these patients (85%) were treated with argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI); approximately 90% showed non-occludable angles following the laser procedure (mean IOP reduction of 18.9%), with no significant differences between patients with plateau iris and lens-induced components (p=0.34; mean follow-up of 11.4 +/- 3.6 months).Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, in this population of Brazilian patients, several eyes with angle closure were not completely treated with LPI. in the present large case series involving middle-age patients, plateau iris was the leading cause of persistent angle closure and was effectively treated with ALPI. A detailed eye examination with indentation gonioscopy should always be performed after LPI to rule out persistent angle closure due to non-pupillary block mechanisms.Hosp Med Olhos, Glaucoma Unit, Osasco, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilMayo Clin, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc