“Early intervention isn't an option, it's a necessity”: learning from implementation facilitators and challenges from the rapid scaling of an early intervention eating disorders programme in England

IntroductionThe First Episode Rapid Early Intervention for Eating Disorders (FREED) service has shown promising outcomes for young people with an eating disorder, leading to national scaling and implementation across England. Between 2020 and 2023, the national implementation of FREED was supported by the Academic Health Science Networks (AHSNs), which are publicly funded organisations with the mission to spread innovations at scale and pace. This study aimed to investigate the views and experiences of AHSN programme leads on the national roll-out of FREED and the perceived sustainability of the model.Methods and resultsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 programme leads across the AHSNs with direct experience supporting the national implementation of FREED. Thematic analysis was adopted using a critical realist approach. Initial sub-themes were inductively generated and then organised under seven larger themes representing the domains of the Non-adoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework. Each sub-theme was classified as a facilitator and/or barrier and then each larger theme/domain was assessed for its complexity (simple, complicated, complex). Data analysis revealed 28 sub-themes, 10 identified as facilitators, 13 as barriers, and five as both. Two domains were classed as simple, three as complicated, and two as complex. Sub-themes ranged from illness-related complexities to organisational pressures. Key facilitators included a high-value proposition for FREED and a supportive network. Key barriers included staffing issues and illness-related factors that challenge early intervention.DiscussionParticipants described broad support for FREED but desired sustained investment for continued provision and improving implementation fidelity. Future development areas raised by participants included enlarging the evidence base for early intervention, increasing associated training opportunities, and widening the reach of FREED. Results offer learning for early intervention in eating disorders and the scaling of new health initiatives

Eating Disorder Clinician Perspective of Early Intervention for Eating Disorder Questionnaire Data file. Data supporting: Clinician Perspectives of the Implementation of an Early Intervention Service for Eating Disorders in England: A Mixed Method Study (2024, Journal of Eating Disorders)

The quantitative data in this file evaluated clinicians attitudes towards early intervention for eating disorder and their views on factors that can impact the implementation of early intervention for eating disorders (factors outlined by the Normalisation Process Theory). The participants in the study were clinicians preparing to or already implementing an early intervention for eating disorders service referred to as First Episode Rapid Early Intervention for Eating Disorders (FREED). The clinicians worked in 31 different eating disorders service in England. Participants included doctors, psychologists, nurses, therapists, occupational therapists, dieticians, social workers, support workers, administrative and managerial staff.The participants in the study completed a questionnaire pack immediate before (Time 1), immediately after (Time 2) and three months after (Time 3) the 1-day in-depth FREED training. The data in the file relate to two questionnaires collected in that questionnaire pack at the three time points. These questionnaires are an attitudes towards early intervention for eating disorders questionnaire and the Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire, which measures Normalisation Process Theory mechanisms

Implementing novel trial methods to evaluate surgery for essential tremor

Introduction. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) can provide dramatic essential tremor (ET) relief, however no Class I evidence exists. Materials and methods. Analysis methods: I) traditional cohort analysis; II) N-of-1 single patient randomised control trial and III) signal-to-noise (S/N) analysis. 20 DBS electrodes in ET patients were switched on and off for 3-min periods. Six pairs of on and off periods in each case, with the pair order determined randomly. Tremor severity was quantified with tremor evaluator and patient was blinded to stimulation. Patients also stated whether they perceived the stimulation to be on after each trial. Results. I) Mean end-of-trial tremor severity 0.84 out of 10 on, 6.62 Off, t = − 13.218, p 80% tremor reduction occurred in 99/114 ‘On’ trials (87%), and 3/114 ‘Off’ trials (3%). S/N ratio for 80% improvement with DBS versus spontaneous improvement was 487,757-to-1. Conclusions. DBS treatment effect on ET is too large for bias to be a plausible explanation. Formal N-of-1 trial design, and S/N ratio method for presenting results, allows this to be demonstrated convincingly where conventional randomised controlled trials are not possible. Classification of evidence. This study is the first to provide Class I evidence for the efficacy of DBS for ET.</p

Datasheet1_“Early intervention isn't an option, it's a necessity”: learning from implementation facilitators and challenges from the rapid scaling of an early intervention eating disorders programme in England.pdf

IntroductionThe First Episode Rapid Early Intervention for Eating Disorders (FREED) service has shown promising outcomes for young people with an eating disorder, leading to national scaling and implementation across England. Between 2020 and 2023, the national implementation of FREED was supported by the Academic Health Science Networks (AHSNs), which are publicly funded organisations with the mission to spread innovations at scale and pace. This study aimed to investigate the views and experiences of AHSN programme leads on the national roll-out of FREED and the perceived sustainability of the model.Methods and resultsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 programme leads across the AHSNs with direct experience supporting the national implementation of FREED. Thematic analysis was adopted using a critical realist approach. Initial sub-themes were inductively generated and then organised under seven larger themes representing the domains of the Non-adoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework. Each sub-theme was classified as a facilitator and/or barrier and then each larger theme/domain was assessed for its complexity (simple, complicated, complex). Data analysis revealed 28 sub-themes, 10 identified as facilitators, 13 as barriers, and five as both. Two domains were classed as simple, three as complicated, and two as complex. Sub-themes ranged from illness-related complexities to organisational pressures. Key facilitators included a high-value proposition for FREED and a supportive network. Key barriers included staffing issues and illness-related factors that challenge early intervention.DiscussionParticipants described broad support for FREED but desired sustained investment for continued provision and improving implementation fidelity. Future development areas raised by participants included enlarging the evidence base for early intervention, increasing associated training opportunities, and widening the reach of FREED. Results offer learning for early intervention in eating disorders and the scaling of new health initiatives.</p