13 research outputs found

    Different Effect of Proteasome Inhibition on Vesicular Stomatitis Virus and Poliovirus Replication

    Get PDF
    Proteasome activity is an important part of viral replication. In this study, we examined the effect of proteasome inhibitors on the replication of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and poliovirus. We found that the proteasome inhibitors significantly suppressed VSV protein synthesis, virus accumulation, and protected infected cells from toxic effect of VSV replication. In contrast, poliovirus replication was delayed, but not diminished in the presence of the proteasome inhibitors MG132 and Bortezomib. We also found that inhibition of proteasomes stimulated stress-related processes, such as accumulation of chaperone hsp70, phosphorylation of eIF2Ξ±, and overall inhibition of translation. VSV replication was sensitive to this stress with significant decline in replication process. Poliovirus growth was less sensitive with only delay in replication. Inhibition of proteasome activity suppressed cellular and VSV protein synthesis, but did not reduce poliovirus protein synthesis. Protein kinase GCN2 supported the ability of proteasome inhibitors to attenuate general translation and to suppress VSV replication. We propose that different mechanisms of translational initiation by VSV and poliovirus determine their sensitivity to stress induced by the inhibition of proteasomes. To our knowledge, this is the first study that connects the effect of stress induced by proteasome inhibition with the efficiency of viral infection

    Different proteasome inhibitors affect VSV replication.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Proteasome inhibitor 1 and Bortezomib decreased VSV replication. Titration of VSV from the medium of overnight infected HeLa cells. VSV infection (MOIβ€Š=β€Š1) for one hour was substituted by the regular medium with indicated concentration of proteasome inhibitors. VSV was titrated by plaque assay after overnight growth. (B) Analysis of P-protein synthesis in the cells treated with proteasome inhibitor 1. HeLa cells were infected with VSV (MOIβ€Š=β€Š5) for 4 h and treated with proteasome inhibitor 1 (PI) or MG132 (MG) at a time of VSV infection. The total protein extracts (5 Β΅g) from these cells were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-P-protein Abs. The concentrations of proteasome inhibitors varied from 5 to 20 Β΅M. Keratin 18 (K18) was a protein loading control. (C) Bortezomib suppressed VSV replication. HeLa cells were infected with VSV, treated with Bortezomib (100 nM) and MG132 (5 Β΅M), and analyzed as described in panel B. K18 was a protein loading control.</p

    Different activation of eIF2Ξ± phosphorylation by VSV and poliovirus infections.

    No full text
    <p>HeLa cells were infected with VSV for 4 h, infected with poliovirus for 4 h, or treated with 1 Β΅M of thapsigargin for 1 hour. Cytoplasmic protein extracts from these and control cells were analyzed with Abs against eIF2Ξ± and phosphorylated form of eIF2Ξ± (panel A). Same membrane was analyzed with Abs against VSV P- protein and poliovirus capsid proteins (panel B).</p

    Proteolytic cleavage of p65-RelA and eIF4G occurred later during poliovirus infection of the cells with inhibited proteasome activity.

    No full text
    <p>HeLa cells and MG 132 2 h pretreated HeLa cells were infected with poliovirus (MOIβ€Š=β€Š5) for 1 h. After change of medium, total protein extracts were collected every hour and tested with anti-p65-RelA C-terminus specific Abs (A) or with anti eIF4G N-terminus specific Abs (B). 10 Β΅g of protein were tested in Western blotting experiments.</p

    Poliovirus protein synthesis was delayed in MG132-pretreated cells.

    No full text
    <p>Control HeLa cells and HeLa cells pre-treated with MG132 for 2 h were infected with poliovirus (MOIβ€Š=β€Š5) for 2, 3 and 4 h. All cells were incubated in methionine/cysteine free medium supplemented with S<sup>35</sup>-methionine/cysteine for last 30 min before harvesting. To study general translation, 10 Β΅g of cytoplasmic protein extracts were separated by electrophoresis and analyzed by autoradiography (A). To study poliovirus capsid protein accumulation, capsid proteins were precipitated by specific Abs from 100 Β΅g of cytoplasmic protein extracts and analyzed by electrophoresis and autoradiography (B).</p

    The effect of MG132 and virus infection on cellular protein synthesis.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Protein extracts were purified from control HeLa cells, cells infected with VSV for 4 h, cells treated with 5 Β΅M of MG132 for 4 h, and cells infected with VSV and treated with MG132 for 4 h. All cells were incubated with S<sup>35</sup> methionine/cysteine for last 30 min before the protein extracts purification. Cytoplasmic protein extracts were analyzed by electrophoresis and autoradiography. (B) Cytoplasmic protein extracts from control, VSV infected, and MG treated cells were precipitated with anti-actin Abs, and the complexes were purified on protein A agarose. S<sup>35</sup> labeled actin was analyzed by electrophoresis and autoradiography. (C) Cytoplasmic S<sup>35</sup>-labeled protein extracts from MG-treated and poliovirus-infected cells were precipitated with anti-actin Abs and analyzed as described in panel B. All protein bands' intensity was detected by ImageJ software to calculate percentage of protein synthesis inhibition.</p
    corecore