The developing world in The New England Journal of Medicine

BACKGROUND: Rampant disease in poor countries impedes development and contributes to growing North-South disparities; however, leading international medical journals underreport on health research priorities for developing countries. METHODS: We examined 416 weekly issues of the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) over an eight-year period, January 1997 to December 2004. A total of 8857 articles were reviewed by both authors. The content of each issue was evaluated in six categories: research, review articles, editorial, correspondence, book reviews and miscellaneous. If the title or abstract concerned a topic pertinent to any health issue in the developing world, the article was reviewed. RESULTS: Over the eight years covered in this study, 1997–2004, in the three essential categories of original research articles, review articles and editorials, less than 3.0 percent of these addressed health issues in the developing world. Publications relevant to DC were largely concerned with HIV and communicable diseases and constituted 135 of the 202 articles of which 63 were devoted to HIV. Only 23 articles addressed non-communicable disease in the DC and only a single article – a book review – discussed heart disease. CONCLUSION: The medical information gap between rich and poor countries as judged by publications in the NEJM appears to be larger than the gap in the funding for research. Under-representation of developing world health issues in the medical literature is a global phenomenon. International medical journals cannot rectify global inequities, but they have an important role in educating their constituencies about the global divide

Spontaneous Variability and Circadian Distribution of Ectopic Activity in Patients With Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia

Day to day variability of ventricular ectopic activity was analyzed in 45 patients with a history of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias who underwent two successive 24 h periods of ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs; 26 were male and 19 female, with a mean age of 56 years (range 15 to 76). The total number of single ventricular premature beats, couplets and ventricular tachycardia beats and runs on days 1 and 2 demonstrated a consistent overall correlation (r = 0.76 to 0.84). Individual variability was evaluated by regression analysis with determination of 95% confidence limits.The minimal decrease in arrhythmia density necessary to distinguish true drug effect from spontaneous variability was 64% for single ventricular premature beats, 83% for couplets, 90% for ventricular tachycardia runs and 93% for ventricular tachycardia beats. To meet the criteria for arrhythmia aggravation, the arrhythmia density had to increase by 400, 877, 1,500 and 2,400%, respectively. Multivariate analysis disclosed an inverse relation between day to day arrhythmia variability and baseline arrhythmia density and age. Variability was more pronounced in patients with coronary artery disease but was not influenced by the type of presenting arrhythmia or left ventricular function.The diurnal distribution of arrhythmias and heart rate followed a distinct circadian pattern. These data indicate that, despite good group reproducibility, spontaneous arrhythmia variability in individuals is substantial, necessitating standards to define both drug effect and arrhythmia aggravation

Unanswered ethical and scientific questions for trials of invasive interventions for coronary disease: The case of single vessel disease

Trials in the 1990s demonstrated that medical therapy is as effective as invasive therapies for treating single-vessel coronary disease. Yet more recent studies enrolling patients with this condition have focused on evaluating only invasive approaches, namely, stenting versus coronary artery bypass surgery. Several ethical and scientific questions remain unanswered regarding the conduct of these later trials. Were they justified? Why wasn't a medical therapy arm included? Were subjects informed about the availability of medical therapy as an equivalent option? Was optimized medical therapy given prior to randomization? The absence of clear answers to these questions raises the possibility of serious bias in favor of invasive interventions. Considering that medical therapy is underutilized in patients with coronary disease, efforts should focus more on increasing utilization of medical therapy and proper selection of noninvasive interventions

Impact of opioid-free analgesia on pain severity and patient satisfaction after discharge from surgery: multispecialty, prospective cohort study in 25 countries

Background: Balancing opioid stewardship and the need for adequate analgesia following discharge after surgery is challenging. This study aimed to compare the outcomes for patients discharged with opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after common surgical procedures.Methods: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study collected data from patients undergoing common acute and elective general surgical, urological, gynaecological, and orthopaedic procedures. The primary outcomes were patient-reported time in severe pain measured on a numerical analogue scale from 0 to 100% and patient-reported satisfaction with pain relief during the first week following discharge. Data were collected by in-hospital chart review and patient telephone interview 1 week after discharge.Results: The study recruited 4273 patients from 144 centres in 25 countries; 1311 patients (30.7%) were prescribed opioid analgesia at discharge. Patients reported being in severe pain for 10 (i.q.r. 1-30)% of the first week after discharge and rated satisfaction with analgesia as 90 (i.q.r. 80-100) of 100. After adjustment for confounders, opioid analgesia on discharge was independently associated with increased pain severity (risk ratio 1.52, 95% c.i. 1.31 to 1.76; P < 0.001) and re-presentation to healthcare providers owing to side-effects of medication (OR 2.38, 95% c.i. 1.36 to 4.17; P = 0.004), but not with satisfaction with analgesia (beta coefficient 0.92, 95% c.i. -1.52 to 3.36; P = 0.468) compared with opioid-free analgesia. Although opioid prescribing varied greatly between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, patient-reported outcomes did not.Conclusion: Opioid analgesia prescription on surgical discharge is associated with a higher risk of re-presentation owing to side-effects of medication and increased patient-reported pain, but not with changes in patient-reported satisfaction. Opioid-free discharge analgesia should be adopted routinely

Peace, a dream unfolding.

599 tr. : minh hoạ ; 21 cm