10 research outputs found
qSOFA score and LqSOFA score as predictors of outcome in an elderly population with chest infection treated in the Emergency Department. A case series
Burden of gout among different WHO regions, 1990–2019: estimates from the global burden of disease study
The global incidence of gout has increased rapidly, likely secondary to the increase in the prevalence of conditions that predispose to gout, such as obesity. Depending on the population studied, the prevalence of gout ranges from less than 1 to 6.8%. Thus, gout can be a significant burden on healthcare systems. The objective of this study is to observe the trends in the incidence, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of gout between 1990 and 2019 globally and in the European Union (EU) 15+ nations. We extracted data from the Global Burden of Disease Study database based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) versions 10 and 9. Incidence, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were extracted for individual EU15+ countries and globally in males and females between 1990 and 2019. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to describe trends. Between 1990 and 2019, gout prevalence, incidence, and DALYs increased in both males (+ 21.42%, + 16.87%, + 21.49%, respectively) and females (+ 21.06%, + 18.75%, + 20.66%, respectively) globally. The United States of America had the highest increase in prevalence (males: + 90.6%; females + 47.1%), incidence (males: + 63.73%; females: + 39.11%) and DALYs (males: + 90.43%; females: + 42.75%). Incidence, prevalence, and DALYs from gout are increasing worldwide and in most of the EU15+ countries for males and females. Studies have reported the association of gout with comorbidities such as metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease. Health policies and resource allocation are required to increase awareness and modify risk factors globally
The effect of osteoporosis on the respiratory function indices of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Objective: Osteoporosis is highly prevalent among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and most commonly presents as a vertebral compression fracture (VCF). Our objective was to quantify the effect of osteoporosis and VCFs on the mortality and pulmonary function tests (PFTs), such as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC), of patients with COPD.Methods: Research conducted for the purposes of this thesis consisted of 2 parts. The first part consisted of a meta-analysis. A PubMed/Medline search was conducted using the search terms “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease”, “osteoporosis” and “vertebral compression fracture”. Meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the differences in mortality and PFTs between patients with COPD with and without osteoporosis or VCFs, according to PRISMA guidelines. The second part consisted of a pilot study of COPD patients, to evaluate the presence of osteoporosis in a Greek cohort of patients with COPD.Results: Of the 896 abstracts identified, 27 studies describing 7662 patients with COPD of which 1883(24.6%) had osteoporosis or VCFs, were included. Random effects model analysis demonstrated that patients with COPD and osteoporosis or VCFs had an increased OR for mortality of 2.40 (95% CI: 1.24;4.64, I2= 89%, P < 0.01), decreased FEV1/FVC with a mean difference of −4.80% (95% CI: −6.69; −2.90,I2= 83%, P < 0.01) and decreased FEV1, with a mean difference of −4.91% (95% CI: −6.51; −3.31, I2= 95%,P < 0.01) and −0.41 L (95% CI: −0.59; −0.24, I2= 97%, P < 0.01), compared to control subjects. Apart from FEV1(liters) in subgroup 1 (P = 0.06), all subgroup analyses found significant differences between groups, as did sensitivity analysis of low risk of bias studies. Regarding the pilot study, 12 patients were included, (7 male, 5 female) with a mean age of 65 years. Of these, 3 had osteopenia and 2 had osteoporosis.Conclusion: Osteoporosis and VCFs are associated with a significant reduction in survival and pulmonary function among patients with COPD. Additional studies are required in this field to corroborate these findings in the Greek population.Στόχος: Η οστεοπόρωση είναι ιδιαίτερα διαδεδομένη σε ασθενείς με χρόνια αποφρακτική πνευμονοπάθεια (ΧΑΠ) και συνήθως εκδηλώνεται με συμπιεστικά κατάγματα σπονδυλικής στήλης. Ο στόχος της παρούσας μελέτης ήταν να ποσοτικοποιηθεί η επίδραση της οστεοπόρωσης και των συμπιεστικών καταγμάτων σπονδυλικής στήλης στη θνησιμότητας και στις δοκιμασίες αναπνευστικής λειτουργίας των ασθενών αυτών, όπως ο βίαια εκπνεόμενος όγκος σε 1 δευτερόλεπτο (forced expiratory volume in one second, FEV1) και η βίαια εκπνεόμενη ζωτική χωρητικότητα (forced vital capacity, FVC).Μέθοδοι: Η μελέτη αυτή περιλάμβανε 2 σκέλη. Το πρώτο μέρος αφορούσε μια εκτενή μετα-ανάλυση μελετών που αφορούσαν ασθενείς με ΧΑΠ και οστεοπόρωση. Για τους σκοπούς της μετα-ανάλυσης διεξήχθη μια αναζήτηση PubMed/Medline με χρήση των όρων αναζήτησης “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease”, “osteoporosis” και “vertebral compression fracture”. Διεξήχθησαν μετα-αναλύσεις για την αξιολόγηση των διαφορών στη θνησιμότητα και των δεικτών αναπνευστικής λειτουργείας μεταξύ ασθενών με ΧΑΠ με και χωρίς οστεοπόρωση ή συμπιεστικά κατάγματα σπονδυλικής στήλης, σύμφωνα με τις οδηγίες της PRISMA. Το δεύτερο σκέλος αφορούσε μια πιλοτική μελέτη ασθενών με ΧΑΠ για την αξιολόγηση της παρουσίας οστεοπόρωσης σε μια ελληνική ομάδα ασθενών με ΧΑΠ.Αποτελέσματα: Από τα 896 άρθρα που εντοπίστηκαν, συμπεριλήφθηκαν 27 μελέτες που περιέγραφαν 7662 ασθενείς με ΧΑΠ, εκ των οποίων οι 1883 (24.6%) είχαν οστεοπόρωση ή συμπιεστικά κατάγματα σπονδυλικής στήλης. Η ανάλυση του μοντέλου τυχαίων επιδράσεων έδειξε ότι οι ασθενείς με ΧΑΠ και οστεοπόρωση ή συμπιεστικά κατάγματα σπονδυλικής στήλης είχαν αυξημένο λόγο πιθανοτήτων (odds ratio, OR) για θνησιμότητα 2.40 (95% CI: 1.24;4.64, I2= 89%, P <0.01), μειωμένο FEV1/FVC με μέση διαφορά − 4.80% (95% CI: -6.69; -2.90,I2= 83%, P <0.01) και μειωμένο FEV1, με μέση διαφορά −4.91% (95% CI: -6.51; −3.31, I2= 95%, P < 0.01) και −0.41 L (95% CI: −0.59; −0.24, I2= 97%, P <0.01), σε σύγκριση με τα άτομα ελέγχου. Εκτός από το FEV1 (λίτρα) στην υποομάδα 1 (P = 0.06), όλες οι αναλύσεις υποομάδας βρήκαν σημαντικές διαφορές μεταξύ των ομάδων, όπως και η ανάλυση ευαισθησίας των μελετών χαμηλού κινδύνου μεροληψίας. Όσον αφορά την πιλοτική μελέτη, συμπεριλήφθηκαν 12 ασθενείς, (7 άνδρες, 5 γυναίκες) με μέση ηλικία τα 65 έτη. Από αυτούς, 3 είχαν οστεοπενία και 2 οστεοπόρωση.Συμπέρασμα: Η οστεοπόρωση και τα συμπιεστικά κατάγματα σπονδυλικής στήλης σχετίζονται με σημαντική μείωση της επιβίωσης και της πνευμονικής λειτουργίας σε ασθενείς με ΧΑΠ. Απαιτούνται επιπλέον μελέτες στον τομέα αυτό για να επιβεβαιωθούν αυτά τα ευρήματα στον ελληνικό πληθυσμό
Fever and Ulcerative Skin Lesions in a Patient Referred for Altered Mental Status: Clinical and Microbiological Diagnosis of Ulceroglandular Tularemia
Background: Tularemia is a devastating disease that affects multiple organ systems and can have several different presentations. In its most frequent form—that of ulceroglandular tularemia—a detailed history and physical examination can enable a physician to make the diagnosis clinically, leading to the prompt initiation of the appropriate antibiotic treatment. Detailed Case Description: A 63-year-old man was brought by ambulance to the emergency department for an evaluation of an altered mental status noted by his psychiatrist at a telehealth appointment. A physical examination revealed a fever and two ulcerative lesions with a central eschar on his left leg (of which the patient was unaware) with ipsilateral tender inguinal lymphadenopathy. When asked, the patient recalled visiting Martha’s Vineyard and having removed ticks from his legs. Gentamicin was administered on the clinical suspicion of ulceroglandular tularemia. Blood and skin lesion cultures grew Gram-negative rods, which were confirmed to be Francisella tularensis on hospital day eight, and the patient fully recovered. Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of clinician perception of altered mental status as a key alarm sign, the necessity of a thorough physical exam independent of the chief compliant in the emergency department, and the essential role of pattern recognition by front-line providers for the appropriate management of uncommon but serious infections such as tularemia
The relationship of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio with health-related quality of life, depression, and disease activity in SLE: a cross-sectional study
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) emerged as a potential biomarker in SLE, but its association with several outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between NLR and SLE disease activity, damage, depression, and health-related quality of life. A cross-sectional study was conducted, including 134 patients with SLE who visited the Division of Rheumatology between November 2019 and June 2021. Demographics and clinical data including NLR, Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus disease activity index (SELENA-SLEDAI), Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI), physician global assessment (PhGA), patient global assessment (PGA), patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-9, patient self-rated health, and lupus quality of life (LupusQoL) scores, were collected. Patients were stratified into two groups and compared using the NLR cut-off of 2.73, the 90th percentile value of healthy individuals. The analysis included t-test for continuous variables, χ2-test for categorical variables, and logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and glucocorticoid use. Among the 134 SLE patients, 47 (35%) had an NLR ≥ 2.73. The NLR ≥ 2.73 group had significantly higher rates of severe depression (PHQ ≥ 15), poor/fair self-rated health, and the presence of damage (SDI ≥ 1). These patients also scored significantly lower in LupusQoL domains (physical health, planning, and body image), and higher in SELENA-SLEDAI, PhGA, and PGA. Logistic regression confirmed that high NLR is associated with severe depression (PHQ ≥ 15) (OR:7.23, 2.03-25.74), poor/fair self-rated health (OR:2.77,1.29-5.96), high SELENA-SLEDAI score(≥ 4) (OR:2.22,1.03-4.78), high PhGA (≥ 2) (OR:3.76, 1.56-9.05), and presence of damage (SDI ≥ 1) (OR:2.67, 1.11-6.43). High NLR in SLE may indicate depression, worse quality of life, active disease, and the presence of damage
Influenza: seasonality and travel-related considerations
RATIONALE FOR REVIEW
This review aims to summarize the transmission patterns of influenza, its seasonality in different parts of the globe, air travel- and cruise ship-related influenza infections and interventions to reduce transmission.
KEY FINDINGS
The seasonality of influenza varies globally, with peak periods occurring mainly between October and April in the northern hemisphere (NH) and between April and October in the southern hemisphere (SH) in temperate climate zones. However, influenza seasonality is significantly more variable in the tropics. Influenza is one of the most common travel-related, vaccine-preventable diseases and can be contracted during travel, such as during a cruise or through air travel. Additionally, travellers can come into contact with people from regions with ongoing influenza transmission. Current influenza immunization schedules in the NH and SH leave individuals susceptible during their respective spring and summer months if they travel to the other hemisphere during that time.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
The differences in influenza seasonality between hemispheres have substantial implications for the effectiveness of influenza vaccination of travellers. Health care providers should be aware of influenza activity when patients report travel plans, and they should provide alerts and advise on prevention, diagnostic and treatment options. To mitigate the risk of travel-related influenza, interventions include antivirals for self-treatment (in combination with the use of rapid self-tests), extending the shelf life of influenza vaccines to enable immunization during the summer months for international travellers and allowing access to the influenza vaccine used in the opposite hemisphere as a travel-related vaccine. With the currently available vaccines, the most important preventive measure involves optimizing the seasonal influenza vaccination. It is also imperative that influenza is recognized as a travel-related illness among both travellers and health care professionals
Influenza:seasonality and travel-related considerations
RATIONALE FOR REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the transmission patterns of influenza, its seasonality in different parts of the globe, air travel- and cruise ship-related influenza infections and interventions to reduce transmission. KEY FINDINGS: The seasonality of influenza varies globally, with peak periods occurring mainly between October and April in the northern hemisphere (NH) and between April and October in the southern hemisphere (SH) in temperate climate zones. However, influenza seasonality is significantly more variable in the tropics. Influenza is one of the most common travel-related, vaccine-preventable diseases and can be contracted during travel, such as during a cruise or through air travel. Additionally, travellers can come into contact with people from regions with ongoing influenza transmission. Current influenza immunization schedules in the NH and SH leave individuals susceptible during their respective spring and summer months if they travel to the other hemisphere during that time.CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: The differences in influenza seasonality between hemispheres have substantial implications for the effectiveness of influenza vaccination of travellers. Health care providers should be aware of influenza activity when patients report travel plans, and they should provide alerts and advise on prevention, diagnostic and treatment options. To mitigate the risk of travel-related influenza, interventions include antivirals for self-treatment (in combination with the use of rapid self-tests), extending the shelf life of influenza vaccines to enable immunization during the summer months for international travellers and allowing access to the influenza vaccine used in the opposite hemisphere as a travel-related vaccine. With the currently available vaccines, the most important preventive measure involves optimizing the seasonal influenza vaccination. It is also imperative that influenza is recognized as a travel-related illness among both travellers and health care professionals.</p
Influenza:seasonality and travel-related considerations
RATIONALE FOR REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the transmission patterns of influenza, its seasonality in different parts of the globe, air travel- and cruise ship-related influenza infections and interventions to reduce transmission. KEY FINDINGS: The seasonality of influenza varies globally, with peak periods occurring mainly between October and April in the northern hemisphere (NH) and between April and October in the southern hemisphere (SH) in temperate climate zones. However, influenza seasonality is significantly more variable in the tropics. Influenza is one of the most common travel-related, vaccine-preventable diseases and can be contracted during travel, such as during a cruise or through air travel. Additionally, travellers can come into contact with people from regions with ongoing influenza transmission. Current influenza immunization schedules in the NH and SH leave individuals susceptible during their respective spring and summer months if they travel to the other hemisphere during that time.CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: The differences in influenza seasonality between hemispheres have substantial implications for the effectiveness of influenza vaccination of travellers. Health care providers should be aware of influenza activity when patients report travel plans, and they should provide alerts and advise on prevention, diagnostic and treatment options. To mitigate the risk of travel-related influenza, interventions include antivirals for self-treatment (in combination with the use of rapid self-tests), extending the shelf life of influenza vaccines to enable immunization during the summer months for international travellers and allowing access to the influenza vaccine used in the opposite hemisphere as a travel-related vaccine. With the currently available vaccines, the most important preventive measure involves optimizing the seasonal influenza vaccination. It is also imperative that influenza is recognized as a travel-related illness among both travellers and health care professionals.</p
The impact of osteoporosis and vertebral compression fractures on mortality and association with pulmonary function in COPD: A meta-analysis
Objective: Osteoporosis is highly prevalent among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and most commonly presents as a vertebral compression fracture (VCF). Our objective was to quantify the effect of osteoporosis and VCFs on the mortality and pulmonary function tests (PFTs), such as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC), of patients with COPD. Methods: A PubMed/Medline search was conducted using the search terms “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease”, “osteoporosis” and “vertebral compression fracture”. Meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the differences in mortality and PFTs between patients with COPD with and without osteoporosis or VCFs, according to PRISMA guidelines. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019120335. Results: Of the 896 abstracts identified, 27 studies describing 7662 patients with COPD of which 1883 (24.6%) had osteoporosis or VCFs, were included. Random effects model analysis demonstrated that patients with COPD and osteoporosis or VCFs had an increased OR for mortality of 2.40 (95% CI: 1.24; 4.64, I2 = 89%, P < 0.01), decreased FEV1/FVC with a mean difference of −4.80% (95% CI: −6.69; −2.90, I2 = 83%, P < 0.01) and decreased FEV1, with a mean difference of −4.91% (95% CI: −6.51; −3.31, I2 = 95%, P < 0.01) and −0.41 L (95% CI: −0.59; −0.24, I2 = 97%, P < 0.01), compared to control subjects. Apart from FEV1 (liters) in subgroup 1 (P = 0.06), all subgroup analyses found significant differences between groups, as did sensitivity analysis of low risk of bias studies. Conclusion: Osteoporosis and VCFs are associated with a significant reduction in survival and pulmonary function among patients with COPD