Phase II Study of BEZ235 versus Everolimus in Patients with Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor‐Naïve Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND: This phase II study investigated whether targeting the phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway via PI3K, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) inhibition using BEZ235 may be more effective than mTORC1 inhibition with everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) who are naïve to mTOR inhibitor therapy. METHODS: Patients with advanced pNET were randomized (1:1) to oral BEZ235 400 mg twice daily or oral everolimus 10 mg once daily on a continuous dosing schedule. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included safety, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure. RESULTS: Enrollment in this study was terminated early (62 enrolled of the 140 planned). The median PFS was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3 to not evaluable [NE]) with BEZ235 versus 10.8 months (95% CI: 8.1–NE) with everolimus (hazard ratio 1.53; 95% CI: 0.72–3.25). The most commonly reported all‐grade adverse events (>50% of patients regardless of study treatment relationship) with BEZ235 were diarrhea (90.3%), stomatitis (74.2%), and nausea (54.8%). CONCLUSION: BEZ235 treatment in mTOR inhibitor‐naïve patients with advanced pNET did not demonstrate increased efficacy compared with everolimus and may be associated with a poorer tolerability profile

Sequential versus combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (FFCD 2000-05): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND: The optimum use of cytotoxic drugs for advanced colorectal cancer has not been defined. Our aim was to investigate whether combination treatment is better than the sequential administration of the same drugs in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients (1:1 ratio) with advanced, measurable, non-resectable colorectal cancer and WHO performance status 0-2 to receive either first-line treatment with bolus (400 mg/m(2)) and infusional (2400 mg/m(2)) fluorouracil plus leucovorin (400 mg/m(2)) (simplified LV5FU2 regimen), second-line LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2)) (FOLFOX6), and third-line LV5FU2 plus irinotecan (180 mg/m(2)) (FOLFIRI) or first-line FOLFOX6 and second-line FOLFIRI. Chemotherapy was administered every 2 weeks. Randomisation was done centrally using minimisation (minimisation factors were WHO performance status, previous adjuvant chemotherapy, number of disease sites, and centre). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival after two lines of treatment. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00126256. FINDINGS: 205 patients were randomly assigned to the sequential group and 205 to the combination group. 161 (79%) patients in the sequential group and 161 (79%) in the combination group died during the study. Median progression-free survival after two lines was 10·5 months (95% CI 9·6-11·5) in the sequential group and 10·3 months (9·0-11·9) in the combination group (hazard ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·77-1·16; p=0·61). All six deaths caused by toxic effects of treatment occurred in the combination group. During first-line chemotherapy, significantly fewer severe (grade 3-4) haematological adverse events (12 events in 203 patients in sequential group vs 83 events in 203 patients in combination group; p<0·0001) and non-haematological adverse events (26 events vs 186 events; p<0·0001) occurred in the sequential group than in the combination group. INTERPRETATION: Upfront combination chemotherapy is more toxic and is not more effective than the sequential use of the same cytotoxic drugs in patients with advanced, non-resectable colorectal cancer. FUNDING: Sanofi-Aventis France

Efficacy of everolimus in patients with metastatic insulinoma and refractory hypoglycemia

BACKGROUND: Refractory hypoglycemia in patients with metastatic insulinoma is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Everolimus could be a new therapeutic option. METHODS: Within the French Group, we conducted a retrospective, multicentric study of endocrine tumors to evaluate the time to the first recurrence of symptomatic hypoglycemia, after everolimus initiation, in patients with metastatic insulinoma and refractory hypoglycemia. Ongoing hyperglycemic medical options, tumor response, and safety information were recorded. RESULTS: Twelve patients with metastatic insulinoma and refractory hypoglycemia who were treated with everolimus between May 2007 and June 2011 were reviewed. Everolimus (starting dose, 10 mg/day, except in one patient, 5 mg/day) was given after a median of four previous therapeutic lines. Medication aimed at normalizing blood glucose levels in 11 patients. After a median duration of 6.5 months (range 1-35+ months), median time to the first recurrence of symptomatic hypoglycemia was 6.5 months (range 0 to 35+ months). Three patients discontinued everolimus because of cardiac and/or pulmonary adverse events at 1, 1.5, and 7 months after initiation, which led to two deaths. Three patients discontinued everolimus because of tumor progression at 2, 3, and 10 months after initiation, without recurrence of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: Everolimus appears to be a new effective treatment for patients with metastatic insulinoma and refractory hypoglycemia. Tolerance should be carefully monitored

Efficacy and safety of long-acting pasireotide or everolimus alone or in combination in patients with advanced carcinoids of the lung and thymus (LUNA): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND: There are no data from prospective studies focused exclusively on patients with advanced lung and thymic carcinoids. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of long-acting pasireotide and everolimus, administered alone or in combination, in patients with advanced carcinoids of the lung or thymus. METHODS: LUNA was a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial of adult patients (aged >18 years) with advanced (unresectable or metastatic), well differentiated carcinoid tumours of the lung or thymus, with radiological progression within 12 months before randomisation, and a WHO performance status of 0-2. At each centre, the investigator or their designee registered each patient using an interactive voice recognition system into one of the three treatment groups. The randomisation allocation sequence was generated by an external company; patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive treatment with long-acting pasireotide (60 mg intramuscularly every 28 days), everolimus (10 mg orally once daily), or both in combination, for the core 12-month treatment period. Patients were stratified by carcinoid type (typical vs atypical) and line of study treatment (first line vs others). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients progression-free at month 9, defined as the proportion of patients with overall lesion assessment at month 9 showing a complete response, partial response, or stable disease according to local Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01563354. The extension phase of the study is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Aug 16, 2013, and Sept 30, 2014, 124 patients were enrolled from 36 centres in nine countries: 41 were allocated to the long-acting pasireotide group, 42 to the everolimus group, and 41 to the combination group. At month 9, the proportion of patients with an overall lesion assessment of complete response, partial response, or stable disease was 16 of 41 patients (39·0%, 95% CI 24·2-55·5) in the long-acting pasireotide group, 14 of 42 patients (33·3%, 19·6-49·5) in the everolimus group, and 24 of 41 patients (58·5%, 42·1-73·7) in the combination group. The most common grade 1-2 adverse events with a suspected association with long-acting pasireotide monotherapy were diarrhoea (15 [37%] of 41), hyperglycaemia (17 [41%]), and weight loss (8 [20%]); those with a suspected association with everolimus monotherapy were stomatitis (26 [62%] of 42) and diarrhoea (16 [38%]); and those suspected to be associated with combination treatment were hyperglycaemia (27 [66%] of 41]), diarrhoea (19 [46%]), and asthenia (8 [20%]). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events with a suspected association with long-acting pasireotide monotherapy were γ-glutamyltransferase increased (four [10%] of 41 patients), diarrhoea (three [7%]), and hyperglycaemia (three [7%]); those for everolimus were hyperglycaemia (seven [17%] of 42 patients), stomatitis (four [10%]), and diarrhoea (three [7%]); those for combination treatment were hyperglycaemia (nine [22%] of 41 patients) and diarrhoea (four [10%]). 11 patients died during the core 12-month treatment phase or up to 56 days after the last study treatment exposure date: two (5%) of 41 in the long-acting pasireotide group, six (14%) of 42 in the everolimus group, and three (7%) of 41 in the combination group. No deaths were suspected to be related to long-acting pasireotide treatment. One death in the everolimus group (acute kidney injury associated with diarrhoea), and two deaths in the combination group (diarrhoea and urinary sepsis in one patient, and acute renal failure and respiratory failure in one patient) were suspected to be related to everolimus treatment. In the latter patient, acute renal failure was not suspected to be related to everolimus treatment, but respiratory failure was suspected to be related. INTERPRETATION: The study met the primary endpoint in all three treatment groups. Safety profiles were consistent with the known safety profiles of these agents. Further studies are needed to confirm the antitumour efficacy of the combination of a somatostatin analogue with everolimus in lung and thymic carcinoids. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma AG

Chemotherapy for Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours with a Ki-67 Index ≥10%: Is There a More Effective Antitumour Regimen? A Retrospective Multicentre Study of the French Group of Endocrine Tumours (GTE)

BACKGROUND: The best chemotherapy regimen for well- differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) with a Ki-67 index ≥10% is still debated. We evaluated the antitumour efficacy of various first-line chemotherapy regimens (streptozocin based, platinum based, or dacarbazine/temozolomide based) in this situation. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre study of the French Group of Endocrine Tumours (GTE), we recruited consecutive patients with advanced well-differentiated pNETs and a Ki-67 index ≥10% receiving chemotherapy between 2000 and 2012. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (42 men, median age 55.5 years) were enrolled from 10 centres. Fifty-one patients (69%) had grade 2 NET and 61 (82%) were stage IV. Median overall survival was 36.3 months. Forty-four patients (59%) received streptozocin-based, 18 (24%) platinum-based, and 12 (16%) dacarbazine/temozolomide-based chemotherapy regimens. These 3 groups were similar regarding age, functioning tumours, grade, the number of metastatic sites, and surgery for primary tumours, but not regarding surgery for metastases and time since diagnosis. Grade 3 NET (HR 2.15, 95% CI: 1.18-3.92, p = 0.012) and age above 55 years (HR 1.84, 95% CI: 1.06-3.18, p = 0.030) were associated with shorter median PFS in the multivariate analyses. Compared to streptozocin-based chemotherapy, no difference was found in terms of PFS for the platinum-based or for the dacarbazine/temozolomide-based chemotherapy regimen: median PFS was 7.2, 7.5, and 7.2 months, respectively (p = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with intermediate or highly proliferative well-differentiated pNETs may benefit from 1 of the 3 chemotherapy regimens. Increased age and grade 3 were associated with shorter median PFS. Randomised studies searching for response predictors and the best efficacy-tolerance ratio are required to personalise the strategy

Is diabetes a risk factor for central venous access port-related bloodstream infection in oncological patients?

International audienceIt was a dogma that patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at increased risk of infection or death associated with an infection. However, in cancer patients, this has not been well investigated. The aim was to investigate whether diabetic patients with cancer are at high risk of central venous access port (CVAP)-related bloodstream infection (BSI), and to analyse mortality after CVAP-BSI. A total of 17 patients with type 1 DM (T1DM), 66 with type 2 DM (T2DM) and 307 non-diabetic patients were included. Each patient was followed up until the first late CVAP-BSI or for a maximum for 1 year in the absence of a CVAP-BSI. Fifty-three CVAP-BSIs occurred in 66,528 catheter-days. The cumulative incidence of CVAP-BSI was not higher in T1DM (5.9 %; p = 0.17) and T2DM (19.7 %; p = 0.70) compared with the non-diabetic patients (12.7 %). However, in patients with CVAP-BSI, the 1-month crude mortality rate was higher in DM patients (42.9 % vs. 15.4 %; p = 0.04), whereas the mortality in patients without CVAP-BSI was similar in both groups of patients (19.8 % vs. 17.1 %; p = 0.58). Of the 12 deaths that occurred within 1 month of CVAP-BSI, 16.66 % was attributable to CVAP-BSI. The predictive factor of 1-month mortality was DM (p = 0.04). Parenteral nutrition (PN) was independently associated with CVAP-BSI in diabetic patients (p = 0.001). In this study, diabetes did not increase the risk of CVAP-BSI, but mortality was higher in diabetic patients who had a CVAP-BSI. This suggests, in addition to medical treatment, CVAP should be withdrawn after infection onset

Propensity score analysis confirms the independent effect of parenteral nutrition on the risk of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection in oncological patients

Background & aims: Parenteral nutrition is known as a high-risk factor for central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection (CVC-RBSI) in cancer patients. Owing to ethical and technical problems, the studies in the literature have nonrandomized designs and are therefore often confounded by biases. We performed a propensity score analysis to estimate the effect of parenteral nutrition on CVC-RBSI in digestive cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy. Methods: Data were collected prospectively. A logistic regression model was used to calculate a propensity score, which was the probability of receiving parenteral nutrition. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression model were used to estimate the effect of the parenteral nutrition on CVC-RBSI after adjustment for the propensity score. Results: Before the propensity score analysis, the differences between patients with (n = 113) and without (n = 312) parenteral nutrition were identified including: male gender, body weight, weight loss, performance status, location of primary cancer, FOLFIRI, and previous long-term corticotherapy. After propensity score stratification, all of the covariates were balanced within each stratum. After adjustment, patients with parenteral nutrition were at a higher risk for CVC-RBSI. Conclusion: By using the propensity score analysis, this study confirmed that parenteral nutrition was an independent risk factor for CVC-RBSI in digestive cancer patients

Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: presentation, diagnosis, pathology and management

AimsTo report the clinical presentation, diagnosis and results of aggressive surgical management in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.MethodsFrom February 1988 to June 1998, 21 patients underwent laparotomy with a 90% resectability rate (19 resections). The 19 liver resections included right trisegmentectomy in six patients, right lobectomy in five, wedge resection in four, left lobectomy in two, left trisegmentectomy in one and a lateral segmentectomy in one. Resection of the biliary confluence with reconstruction by a Roux en Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed in three patients.ResultsMild abdominal pain, weight loss and gastrointestinal disturbances were the most frequent clinical signs. Jaundice was present in only four patients. Pre-operative radiological investigations (abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, arteriography) correlated with pathological findings in only 60% of cases. Pre-operative histological findings (fine-needle cytology, liver biopsy), available for 19 patients, did not always provide an accurate diagnosis. The mortality and morbidity rates were 5 and 47%, respectively. The median survival of resected patients was 18 months. Overall patient and tumour-free survival rates were 83 and 31% at 1 year, 33 and 16.5% at 2 years and 16.5 and 16.5% at 3 years in the resected group. Lymph-node spread, vascular invasion, positive margins and bilobar distribution were associated with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis.ConclusionDespite the advanced stage of these tumours at presentation, patient survival can be improved by aggressive surgical resection. As intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma usually develops in a non-cirrhotic liver, major hepatic resections to obtain disease-free margins can be performed with low mortality.El Rassi, Z E ; Partensky, C ; Scoazec, J Y ; Henry, L ; Lombard-bohas, C ; Maddern,

Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: presentation, diagnosis, pathology and management

AimsTo report the clinical presentation, diagnosis and results of aggressive surgical management in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.MethodsFrom February 1988 to June 1998, 21 patients underwent laparotomy with a 90% resectability rate (19 resections). The 19 liver resections included right trisegmentectomy in six patients, right lobectomy in five, wedge resection in four, left lobectomy in two, left trisegmentectomy in one and a lateral segmentectomy in one. Resection of the biliary confluence with reconstruction by a Roux en Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed in three patients.ResultsMild abdominal pain, weight loss and gastrointestinal disturbances were the most frequent clinical signs. Jaundice was present in only four patients. Pre-operative radiological investigations (abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, arteriography) correlated with pathological findings in only 60% of cases. Pre-operative histological findings (fine-needle cytology, liver biopsy), available for 19 patients, did not always provide an accurate diagnosis. The mortality and morbidity rates were 5 and 47%, respectively. The median survival of resected patients was 18 months. Overall patient and tumour-free survival rates were 83 and 31% at 1 year, 33 and 16.5% at 2 years and 16.5 and 16.5% at 3 years in the resected group. Lymph-node spread, vascular invasion, positive margins and bilobar distribution were associated with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis.ConclusionDespite the advanced stage of these tumours at presentation, patient survival can be improved by aggressive surgical resection. As intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma usually develops in a non-cirrhotic liver, major hepatic resections to obtain disease-free margins can be performed with low mortality.El Rassi, Z E ; Partensky, C ; Scoazec, J Y ; Henry, L ; Lombard-bohas, C ; Maddern,