Donut-Shaped High-Dose Configuration for Proton Beam Radiation Therapy

Background: : The authors report on the conception and first clinical application of a donut-shaped high-dose configuration for proton therapy (PT). This approach allows one to intensify target volume dose coverage for targets encompassing a critical, dose-limiting structure—like here, the cauda equina—, whilst delivering minimal dose to other healthy structures surrounding the target, thereby reducing the integral dose. Methods and Results: : Intensity-modulated PT methods (IMPT) for spot scanning were applied to create and deliver a donut-shaped high-dose configuration with protons, allowing treating > 75% of the target with at least 95% of the prescribed dose of 72.8 CGE, whilst restricting dose to the cauda equina to 60-65 CGE. Integral dose was lower by a factor of 3.3 as compared to intensity-modulated radiotherapy with photons (IMXT). Conclusion: : IMPT and spot scanning technology allow a potentially clinically useful approach which is also applicable to spare other critical structures passing through a target volume, including spinal cord, optic nerves, chiasm, brain stem, or urethr

Radiation therapy planning with photons and protons for early and advanced breast cancer: an overview

Postoperative radiation therapy substantially decreases local relapse and moderately reduces breast cancer mortality, but can be associated with increased late mortality due to cardiovascular morbidity and secondary malignancies. Sophistication of breast irradiation techniques, including conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy, has been shown to markedly reduce cardiac and lung irradiation. The delivery of more conformal treatment can also be achieved with particle beam therapy using protons. Protons have superior dose distributional qualities compared to photons, as dose deposition occurs in a modulated narrow zone, called the Bragg peak. As a result, further dose optimization in breast cancer treatment can be reasonably expected with protons. In this review, we outline the potential indications and benefits of breast cancer radiotherapy with protons. Comparative planning studies and preliminary clinical data are detailed and future developments are considered

JulianA: An automatic treatment planning platform for intensity-modulated proton therapy and its application to intra- and extracerebral neoplasms

Creating high quality treatment plans is crucial for a successful radiotherapy treatment. However, it demands substantial effort and special training for dosimetrists. Existing automated treatment planning systems typically require either an explicit prioritization of planning objectives, human-assigned objective weights, large amounts of historic plans to train an artificial intelligence or long planning times. Many of the existing auto-planning tools are difficult to extend to new planning goals. A new spot weight optimisation algorithm, called JulianA, was developed. The algorithm minimises a scalar loss function that is built only based on the prescribed dose to the tumour and organs at risk (OARs), but does not rely on historic plans. The objective weights in the loss function have default values that do not need to be changed for the patients in our dataset. The system is a versatile tool for researchers and clinicians without specialised programming skills. Extending it is as easy as adding an additional term to the loss function. JulianA was validated on a dataset of 19 patients with intra- and extracerebral neoplasms within the cranial region that had been treated at our institute. For each patient, a reference plan which was delivered to the cancer patient, was exported from our treatment database. Then JulianA created the auto plan using the same beam arrangement. The reference and auto plans were given to a blinded independent reviewer who assessed the acceptability of each plan, ranked the plans and assigned the human-/machine-made labels. The auto plans were considered acceptable in 16 out of 19 patients and at least as good as the reference plan for 11 patients. Whether a plan was crafted by a dosimetrist or JulianA was only recognised for 9 cases. The median time for the spot weight optimisation is approx. 2 min (range: 0.5 min - 7 min)

Impact of spot reduction on the effectiveness of rescanning in pencil beam scanned proton therapy for mobile tumours.

Objective. In pencil beam scanning proton therapy, individually calculated and positioned proton pencil beams, also referred to as 'spots', are used to achieve a highly conformal dose distributions to the target. Recent work has shown that this number of spots can be substantially reduced, resulting in shorter delivery times without compromising dosimetric plan quality. However, the sensitivity of spot-reduced plans to tumour motion is unclear. Although previous work has shown that spot-reduced plans are slightly more sensitive to small positioning inaccuracies of the individual pencil beams, the resulting shorter delivery times may allow for more rescanning. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of tumour motion and the effectiveness of 3D volumetric rescanning for spot-reduced treatment plans.Approach.Three liver and two lung cancer patients with non-negligible motion amplitudes were analysed. Conventional and probabilistic internal target volume definitions were used for planning considering single or multiple breathing cycles respectively. For each patient, one clinical and two spot-reduced treatment plans were created using identical field geometries. 4D dynamic dose calculations were then performed and resulting target coverage (V95%), dose homogeneity (D5%-D95%) and hot spots (D2%) evaluated for 1-25 rescans.Main results. Over all patients investigated, spot reduction reduced the number of spots by 91% in comparison to the clinical plan, reducing field delivery times by approximately 50%. This reduction, together with the substantially increased dose per spot resulting from the spot reduction process, allowed for more rescans in the same amount of time as for clinical plans and typically improved dosimetric parameters, in some cases to values better than the reference static (3D calculated) plans. However, spot-reduced plans had an increased possibility of interference with the breathing cycle, especially for simulations of perfectly repeatable breathing.Significance.For the patients analysed in this study, spot-reduced plans were found to be a valuable option to increase the efficiency of 3D volumetric rescanning for motion mitigation, if attention is paid to possible interference patterns

The Impact of IMRT and Proton Radiotherapy on Secondary Cancer Incidence

Background and Purpose:: There is concern about the increase of radiation-induced malignancies with the application of modern radiation treatment techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton radiotherapy. Therefore, X-ray scatter and neutron radiation as well as the impact of the primary dose distribution on secondary cancer incidence are analyzed. Material and Methods:: The organ equivalent dose (OED) concept with a linear-exponential and a plateau dose-response curve was applied to dose distributions of 30 patients who received radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy was used in eleven patients, another eleven patients received IMRT with 6-MV photons, and eight patients were treated with spot-scanned protons. The treatment plans were recalculated with 15-MV and 18-MV photons. Secondary cancer risk was estimated based on the OED for the different treatment techniques. Results:: A modest increase of 15% radiation-induced cancer results from IMRT using low energies (6 MV), compared to conventional four-field planning with 15-MV photons (plateau dose-response: 1%). The probability to develop a secondary cancer increases with IMRT of higher energies by 20% and 60% for 15 MV and 18 MV, respectively (plateau dose-response: 2% and 30%). The use of spot-scanned protons can reduce secondary cancer incidence as much as 50% (independent of dose-response). Conclusion:: By including the primary dose distribution into the analysis of radiation-induced cancer incidence, the resulting increase in risk for secondary cancer using modern treatment techniques such as IMRT is not as dramatic as expected from earlier studies. By using 6-MV photons, only a moderate risk increase is expected. Spot-scanned protons are the treatment of choice in regard to secondary cancer incidenc

Ultra-fast pencil beam scanning proton therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancers: field delivery within a single breath-hold.

PURPOSE The use of motion mitigation techniques such as breath-hold can reduce the dosimetric uncertainty of lung cancer proton therapy. We studied the feasibility of pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy field delivery within a single breath-hold at PSI's Gantry 2. METHODS In PBS proton therapy, the delivery time for a field is determined by the beam-on time and the dead time between proton spots (the time required to change the energy and/or lateral position). We studied ways to reduce beam-on and lateral scanning time, without sacrificing dosimetric plan quality, aiming at a single field delivery time of 15 seconds at maximum. We tested this approach on 10 lung cases with varying target volumes. To reduce the beam-on time, we increased the beam current at the isocenter by developing new beam optics for PSI's PROSCAN beamline and Gantry 2. To reduce the dead time between the spots, we used spot-reduced plan optimization. RESULTS We found that it is possible to achieve conventional fractionated (2 Gy(RBE)/fraction) and hypofractionated (6 Gy(RBE)/fraction) field delivery times within a single breath-hold (<15 sec) for a variety non-small-cell lung cancer cases. CONCLUSION In summary, the combination of spot reduction and improved beam line transmission is a promising approach for the treatment of mobile tumours within clinically achievable breath-hold durations

Universal and dynamic ridge filter for pencil beam scanning particle therapy: a novel concept for ultra-fast treatment delivery.

Objective.In pencil beam scanning particle therapy, a short treatment delivery time is paramount for the efficient treatment of moving targets with motion mitigation techniques (such as breath-hold, rescanning, and gating). Energy and spot position change time are limiting factors in reducing treatment time. In this study, we designed a universal and dynamic energy modulator (ridge filter, RF) to broaden the Bragg peak, to reduce the number of energies and spots required to cover the target volume, thus lowering the treatment time.Approach. Our RF unit comprises two identical RFs placed just before the isocenter. Both RFs move relative to each other, changing the Bragg peak's characteristics dynamically. We simulated different Bragg peak shapes with the RF in Monte Carlo simulation code (TOPAS) and validated them experimentally. We then delivered single-field plans with 1 Gy/fraction to different geometrical targets in water, to measure the dose delivery time using the RF and compare it with the clinical settings.Main results.Aligning the RFs in different positions produces different broadening in the Bragg peak; we achieved a maximum broadening of 2.5 cm. With RF we reduced the number of energies in a field by more than 60%, and the dose delivery time by 50%, for all geometrical targets investigated, without compromising the dose distribution transverse and distal fall-off.Significance. Our novel universal and dynamic RF allows for the adaptation of the Bragg peak broadening for a spot and/or energy layer based on the requirement of dose shaping in the target volume. It significantly reduces the number of energy layers and spots to cover the target volume, and thus the treatment time. This RF design is ideal for ultra-fast treatment delivery within a single breath-hold (5-10 s), efficient delivery of motion mitigation techniques, and small animal irradiation with ultra-high dose rates (FLASH)

Treatment planning comparison for head and neck cancer between photon, proton, and combined proton-photon therapy - From a fixed beam line to an arc

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study investigates whether combined proton-photon therapy (CPPT) improves treatment plan quality compared to single-modality intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Different proton beam arrangements for CPPT and IMPT are compared, which could be of specific interest concerning potential future upright-positioned treatments. Furthermore, it is evaluated if CPPT benefits remain under inter-fractional anatomical changes for HNC treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five HNC patients with a planning CT and multiple (4-7) repeated CTs were studied. CPPT with simultaneously optimized photon and proton fluence, single-modality IMPT, and IMRT treatment plans were optimized on the planning CT and then recalculated and reoptimized on each repeated CT. For CPPT and IMPT, plans with different degrees of freedom for the proton beams were optimized. Fixed horizontal proton beam line (FHB), gantry-like, and arc-like plans were compared. RESULTS: The target coverage for CPPT without adaptation is insufficient (average V95%=88.4 %), while adapted plans can recover the initial treatment plan quality for target (average V95%=95.5 %) and organs-at-risk. CPPT with increased proton beam flexibility increases plan quality and reduces normal tissue complication probability of Xerostomia and Dysphagia. On average, Xerostomia NTCP reductions compared to IMRT are -2.7 %/-3.4 %/-5.0 % for CPPT FHB/CPPT Gantry/CPPT Arc. The differences for IMPT FHB/IMPT Gantry/IMPT Arc are + 0.8 %/-0.9 %/-4.3 %. CONCLUSION: CPPT for HNC needs adaptive treatments. Increasing proton beam flexibility in CPPT, either by using a gantry or an upright-positioned patient, improves treatment plan quality. However, the photon component is substantially reduced, therefore, the balance between improved plan quality and costs must be further determined

Treatment planning comparison for head and neck cancer between photon, proton, and combined proton-photon therapy - from a fixed beam line to an arc.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study investigates whether combined proton-photon therapy (CPPT) improves treatment plan quality compared to single-modality intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Different proton beam arrangements for CPPT and IMPT are compared, which could be of specific interest concerning potential future upright-positioned treatments. Furthermore, it is evaluated if CPPT benefits remain under inter-fractional anatomical changes for HNC treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS Five HNC patients with a planning CT and multiple (4-7) repeated CTs were studied. CPPT with simultaneously optimized photon and proton fluence, single-modality IMPT, and IMRT treatment plans were optimized on the planning CT and then recalculated and reoptimized on each repeated CT. For CPPT and IMPT, plans with different degrees of freedom for the proton beams were optimized. Fixed horizontal proton beam line (FHB), gantry-like, and arc-like plans were compared. RESULTS The target coverage for CPPT without adaptation is insufficient (average V95%=88.4%), while adapted plans can recover the initial treatment plan quality for target (average V95%=95.5%) and organs-at-risk. CPPT with increased proton beam flexibility increases plan quality and reduces normal tissue complication probability of Xerostomia and Dysphagia. On average, Xerostomia NTCP reductions compared to IMRT are -2.7%/-3.4%/-5.0% for CPPT FHB/CPPT Gantry/CPPT Arc. The differences for IMPT FHB/IMPT Gantry/IMPT Arc are +0.8%/-0.9%/-4.3%. CONCLUSION CPPT for HNC needs adaptive treatments. Increasing proton beam flexibility in CPPT, either by using a gantry or an upright-positioned patient, improves treatment plan quality. However, the photon component is substantially reduced, therefore, the balance between improved plan quality and costs must be further determined