Towards an optimal therapy strategy for myogenous TMD, physiotherapy compared with occlusal splint therapy in an RCT with therapy-and-patient-specific treatment durations

Appendix. Threshold of signs and symptoms. Post-hoc power analysis on measures of effectiveness. Two-way ANOVA statistical analysis for pain intensity. Rules for progressing and ending splint therapy. Rules for progressing and ending physiotherapy. A stepped-care model including two possible therapies. (PDF 86 kb

The Dutch version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-NL): Translation, reliability and construct validity

Background The purpose of this study was to make a cross-culturally adapted, Dutch version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), a 49-item questionnaire measuring oral health-related quality of life, and to examine its psychometric properties. Methods The original English version of the OHIP was translated into the Dutch language, following the guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures. The resulting OHIP-NL's psychometric properties were examined in a sample of 119 patients (68.9 % women; mean age = 57.1 ± 12.2 yrs). They were referred to the clinic of Prosthodontics and Implantology with complaints concerning their partial or full dentures or other problems with missing teeth. To establish the reliability of the OHIP-NL, internal consistency and test-retest reliability (N = 41; 1 - 2 weeks interval) were examined, using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), respectively. Further, construct validity was established by calculating ANOVA. Results Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82 - 0.97; ICC = 0.78 - 0.90). In addition, all associations were significant and in the expected direction. Conclusion In conclusion: the OHIP-NL can be considered a reliable and valid instrument to measure oral health-related quality of life

Symptoms in different severity degrees of bruxism: a cross-sectional study

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate symptoms of the muscle pain, sleep quality, oral health, anxiety, stress and depression in individuals with different severity degrees of bruxism. Methods: Seventy-two individuals with bruxism were enrolled in the study, classified into: moderate (n=25) and severe (n=47) bruxism. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogical Scale, pain threshold with algometer, sleep quality by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, oral health by the Oral Health Impact Profile, anxiety by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, stress by the Perceived Stress Scale and depression using the Beck Depression Inventory. The significance level considered was 5%. Results: The results showed that individuals with severe bruxism presented greater muscle pain intensity, sleep disorder, worse oral health, high anxiety level and dysphoria with statistically significant differences (pObjetivo: Avaliar sintomas de dor muscular, qualidade de sono, saúde bucal, ansiedade, estresse e depressão em indivíduos com diferentes graus de severidade do bruxismo. Métodos: Setenta e dois indivíduos com bruxismo participaram do estudo e foram classificados com bruxismo moderado (n=25) e severo (n=47). A intensidade da dor foi avaliada pela Escala Visual Analógica, limiar de dor com o algômetro, qualidade de sono pelo Índice de Qualidade de Sono de Pittsburgh, saúde bucal pelo Perfil de Impacto de Saúde Bucal, ansiedade pelo Inventário de Ansiedade Traço-Estado, estresse pela Escala de Estresse Percebido e depressão pelo Inventário de Depressão de Beck. O nível de significância considerado foi 5%. Resultados: Os resultados demonstraram que indivíduos com bruxismo severo apresentaram maior intensidade de dor muscular, distúrbio do sono, pior qualidade de saúde bucal, elevado grau de ansiedade e disforia, com diferenças estatisticamente significantes (p;0,05). Conclusão: Os dados sugerem que indivíduos com bruxismo severo tem sintomas mais intensos. Eles apresentam maior intensidade de dor muscular, alterações na qualidade do sono e saúde bucal, ansiedade e depressão do que indivíduos com bruxismo moderado. Porém, ambos apresentam similaridade no estresse.Objetivo: Evaluar los síntomas dolor muscular, calidad de sueño, salud bucal, ansiedad, estrés y depresión en sujetos con diferentes niveles de gravedad del bruxismo. Método: Participaron del estudio 72 personas con bruxismo, clasificado según los niveles moderado (n=25) y grave (n=47). Se evaluaron la intensidad del dolor mediante la Escala Visual Analógica, umbral de dolor con algómetro, la calidad de sueño por el Índice de Calidad de Sueño de Pittsburgh, la salud bucal mediante el Perfil del Impacto de Salud Bucal, la ansiedad por el Inventario de Ansiedad Rasgo-Estado, el estrés mediante la Escala de Estrés Percibido y la depresión por el Inventario de Depresión de Beck. Se consideró el nivel de significación de 5%. Resultados: Los sujetos con bruxismo grave presentaron más intensamente dolor muscular, trastorno de sueño, peor calidad de salud bucal, alto grado de ansiedad y disforia, con diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p;0,05). Conclusión: Los datos mostraron que los sujetos con bruxismo grave sufren síntomas más intensos. A pesar de sufrir síntomas más intensos de dolor muscular, calidad de sueño y salud bucal alterada, ansiedad y depresión que los sujetos con bruxismo moderado, el estrés está presente en los dos niveles de bruxismo

Bruxism: A Literature Review

Bruxism is a movement disorder characterized by grinding and clenching of teeth. Awake bruxism is found more in females as compared to males while sleep bruxism shows no such gender prevalence. Etiology of bruxism can be divided into three groups psychosocial factors, peripheral factors and pathophysiological factors. Treatment modalities involve occlusal correction, behavioural changes and pharmacological approach. A literature search was performed using National Library of Medicine’s (NLM) Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Database, Pubmed and Google search engines. The search term ‘Bruxism’ yielded 2,358 papers out of which 230 were review papers. Most of the papers selected were recently published during the period of 1996–2010 and very few of them were published before 1996