2,023 research outputs found

    Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) in Long Standing Crohn’s disease on Anti-TNF Therapy

    Get PDF
    Introduction Patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk for developing cancer. Adenocarcinomas are the most commonly observed tumors of the gastrointestinal tract whereas data on gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in IBD patients is limited. GIST is a neoplasm that originates from the interstitial cells of Cajal in the smooth muscle layers of the gastrointestinal tract. [1] The association between GIST and Crohn’s disease (CD) is debated, as the tumor inconsistently present in areas of inflammatory activity. We report an interesting case of CD maintained on Infliximab, who presented with a flare that revealed GIST in the stomach. To our knowledge, this is the first reported occurrence of GIST in stomach in a patient with CD maintained on anti-TNF therapy. Case Report A 40-year-old Caucasian man with a history of small bowel Crohn’s disease on infliximab therapy presented with a two-day history of abdominal pain, hematochezia, and diffuse joint pain. Upon admission, the patient was hemodynamically stable and afebrile, with a blood pressure of 140/70 mmHg, heart rate of 90 beats per minute, and respiratory rate of 14 per minute. Physical exam was remarkable for abdominal distension and diffuse abdominal tenderness. Complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and C-reactive protein were within normal range. The patient reported no history of alcohol abuse, smoking, recent abdominal procedures, or trauma. The patient had computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen done that revealed a 2.5-centimeter exophytic mass in the stomach with possible liver metastases (Fig. 1). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided biopsies of the exophytic mass confirmed gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) on fine needle aspiration and flow cytometry results (Fig. 2,3). The patient underwent surgical resection without complication and is back to his usual state of health. Discussion GIST is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm in the gastrointestinal tract [1,2]. The annual incidence of GIST has been reported as 11-19.6 per million [3,4], however a more recent analysis in 2015 estimates the annual incidence to be 6.8 per million with a 53% predominance in males and 73% predominance in Caucasians [5]. Individuals are typically diagnosed with GIST in their seventh decade of life [5]. Immunologically, it is reported that 70-80% of GIST have a mutation in the KIT gene, leading to a continuously active KIT receptor, independent of its activating ligand [1]. KIT activation leads to overexpression of the protein CD117. In KIT-negative GIST, a small number are observed to have a mutation in platelet-derived growth factor receptor-a (PDGFRA). Dysregulated activation of either of these genes results in uncontrolled cell growth and survival. It is estimated that 10-15% of GIST do not have mutations in either KIT or PDGRFA, and while they are considered wild-type, they are shown to express high levels of KIT [1]. More recently, Novelli et al. found that the presence of proteins CD117 and DOG1 had the highest sensitivity and specificity for GIST [6]. The majority of GIST develop in the stomach (60%), with the jejunum and ileum representing the next most common site of involvement (30%) [7]. Several prognostic factors have been researched, most notably tumor location and mitotic index. Emory et al. found that GIST originating from the esophagus had the highest survival rate, followed by those that arose from the stomach, small bowel, colon/rectum, and omentum/mesentery in decreasing order [8]. Additionally, mitotic index, defined as the number of mitotic figures per high-power field (HPF), is reported an independent prognostic factor, with greater than 10 mitotic figures per 50 HPF showing the largest difference in survival in gastric GIST [8]. Small bowel GIST exhibited minimally different survival curves with respect to mitotic index. Age was also found to be an independent prognostic factor of survival in GIST [8]. Later research by Miettinen demonstrated that larger gastric GIST with a diameter of 10cm and 5 mitotic figures per 50 HPF carried a lower metastatic risk in comparison to gastric GIST with diameter of \u3e 5cm but with \u3e 5 mitotic figures per 50 HPF [9]. This may suggest that in gastric GIST, mitotic index carries the most prognostic value. Miettinen found that in intestinal GIST, a diameter of \u3e 5cm and \u3e 5 mitotic figures per HPF each independently carried a moderate or high risk of metastasis, respectively. Intestinal GIST carried a 39% tumor-related mortality rate, compared to 17% for gastric GIST [10,11]. Currently, surgery is the primary treatment modality for nonmetastatic GIST that is technically amenable to resection. Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), may be used as neoadjuvant therapy or as initial therapy for nonresectable disease [12]. Imatinib directly binds to the KIT protein and prevents further signaling [1]. This medication first demonstrated favorable treatment effects in 2002, with over 50% of the 147 patients showing at least a partial response to therapy [13]. Some patients develop resistance to Imatinib, prompting the development of alternative TKI therapy. Currently, Sunitinib is FDA approved for Imatinib-resistant GIST [14], with a host of other TKI’s and alternative therapies under investigation [1]. In 2012, Körner examined glucagon-like peptide-2 receptor (GLP-2) expression in a variety of neoplasm and found that 68% of the GISTs expressed this receptor in the intestinal myenteric plexus [15]. Additionally, this receptor was expressed in high density in patients with Crohn’s disease. Interestingly, this expression was absent in active or inactive ulcerative colitis as well as Hirschsprung’s disease [15]. Table 1: GIST with concurrent IBD. Author (ref) Age, Sex IBD Symptoms Location of GIST Imaging or operative findings Pfeffela, 1999 [16] 51, M CD Weight loss, Abdominal pain, Fever, Fatigue Ileum Large tumorous lesions in the right lower abdomen (terminal ileum) measuring 8 × 5 × 6 cm Grieco, 2002 [17] 57, F UC Melena, progressive anemia Ileum Solid mass in the left pelvic cavity with a diameter of 7 cm Mijandrusić Sincić, 2005 [18] 81, M CD Ileus Meckel’s diverticulum Dilated loops of intestine with large packets of gas and anti-peristalsis Kaiser, 2006 [19] 64, M UC Severe bleeding, abdominal distension Omentum 8 cm mass attached to greater omentum Ruffolo, 2010 [20] 59, M UC Rectal bleeding Rectum 0.5 cm GIST located 20 cm from anal adenocarcinoma Theodoropoulos, 2009 [21] 45, M CD Abdominal pain, vomiting, constipation, bloating Jejunum and Ileum 6 mm GIST within jejunoileal intussusception Bocker U, 2008 [22] 26, F CD Abdominal cramping, gastrointestinal bleeding Duodenum Ulcerated lesion noted 140 cm past proximal duodenum on enteroscopy Gianluca, 2016 [7] 38, M CD Asymptomatic Small bowel A mass found along the small bowel Gianluca, 2016 [7] 53, M UC Abrupt postoperative bleeding Stomach No evidences of masses at surgery. Gastric bleeding at endoscopy Present paper 40, M CD Abdominal pain, hematochezia Stomach 2.5 cm exophytic mass in the stomach with possible liver metastases CONCLUSION Our case of Crohn’s disease diagnosed with gastric GIST sheds light on a rare link between two separate disease entities native to the gastrointestinal system. While there exists a well-known association between inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer, other malignancies are described much less frequently in the literature. The development of gastric GIST with underlying Crohn’s disease is a rare occurrence, but is one that should be kept in mind when evaluating patients with inflammatory bowel disease found to have new masses on imaging. References: 1. Corless CL, Barnett CM, Heinrich MC. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: Origin and molecular oncology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(12):865-878. doi:10.1038/nrc3143 2. Katzka DA, Loftus E V., Camilleri M. Evolving molecular targets in the treatment of nonmalignant gastrointestinal diseases. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;92(3):306-320. doi:10.1038/clpt.2012.77 3. Nilsson B, Bümming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: The incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era - A population-based study in western Sweden. Cancer. 2005;103(4):821-829. doi:10.1002/cncr.20862 4. Goettsch WG, Bos SD, Breekveldt-Postma N, Casparie M, Herings RMC, Hogendoorn PCW. Incidence of gastrointestinal stromal tumours is underestimated: Results of a nation-wide study. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(18):2868-2872. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.009 5. Ma GL, Murphy JD, Martinez ME, Sicklick JK. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of histology codes: Results of a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015;24(1):298-302. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1002 6. Novelli M, Rossi S, Rodriguez-Justo M, et al. DOG1 and CD117 are the antibodies of choice in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Histopathology. 2010;57(2):259-270. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03624.x 7. Pellino G, Marcellinaro R, Candilio G, et al. The experience of a referral centre and literature overview of GIST and carcinoid tumours in inflammatory bowel diseases. Int J Surg. 2016;28:S133-S141. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.051 8. Emory TS, Sobin LH, Lukes L, Lee DH, O’Leary TJ. Prognosis of gastrointestinal smooth-muscle (stromal) tumors: Dependence on anatomic site. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23(1):82-87. doi:10.1097/00000478-199901000-00009 9. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006. doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2006.09.001 10. Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(1):52-68. doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000146010.92933.de 11. Miettinen M, Makhlouf H, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the jejunum and ileum: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 906 cases before imatinib with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(4):477-489. doi:10.1097/00000478-200604000-00008 12. Demetri GD, Benjamin R, Blanke CD, et al. NCCN Task Force Report: Optimal Management of Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)--Expansion and Update of NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines. Vol 2 Suppl 1.; 2004. 13. Eorge D Emetri GD, Argaret Von Ehren MM, Harles B Lanke CD, et al. The New Eng Land Jour Nal of Medicine EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF IMATINIB MESYLATE IN ADVANCED GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS A BSTRACT Background Constitutive Activation of KIT Receptor. Vol 347.; 2002. www.nejm.org. Accessed January 29, 2020. 14. Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, et al. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368(9544):1329-1338. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69446-4 15. Körner M, Rehmann R, Reubi JC. GLP-2 receptors in human disease: High expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and Crohn’s disease. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;364(1-2):46-53. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2012.08.008 16. Pfeffel F, Stiglbauer W, Depisch D, Oberhuber G, Raderer M, Scheithauer W. Coincidence of Crohn’s disease and a high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the terminal ileum. Digestion. 1999. doi:10.1159/000007684 17. Grieco A, Cavallaro A, Potenza AE, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and ulcerative colitis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002. 18. Mijandrusic Sincic BM, Kovać D, Jašić M, Grbas H, Uravić M, Depolo A. Crohn’s disease and a gastrointestinal stromal tumor in an 81-year-old man - A rare coincidence. Zentralbl Chir. 2005. doi:10.1055/s-2005-918206 19. Kaiser AM, Kang JC, Tolazzi AR, Sherrod AE, Beart RW. Primary solitary extragastrointestinal stromal tumor of the greater omentum coexisting with ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51(10):1850-1852. doi:10.1007/s10620-006-9217-y 20. Ruffolo C, Massani M, Rossi S, Caratozzolo E, Antoniutti M, Bassi N. Adenocarcinoma and GIST in ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25(8):1027-1028. doi:10.1007/s00384-010-0905-x 21. Theodoropoulos GE, Linardoutsos D, Tsamis D, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor causing small bowel intussusception in a patient with Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(41):5224-5227. doi:10.3748/wjg.15.5224 22. Böcker U, Löhr JM, Marx A. Twenty-six-year-old female with assumed Crohn’s disease and a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Response. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(4):489-490. doi:10.1002/ibd.2065

    Construction of Non-Perturbative, Unitary Particle-Antiparticle Amplitudes for Finite Particle Number Scattering Formalisms

    Full text link
    Starting from a unitary, Lorentz invariant two-particle scattering amplitude , we show how to use an identification and replacement process to construct a unique, unitary particle-antiparticle amplitude. This process differs from conventional on-shell Mandelstam s,t,u crossing in that the input and constructed amplitudes can be off-diagonal and off-energy shell. Further, amplitudes are constructed using the invariant parameters which are appropriate to use as driving terms in the multi-particle, multichannel non-perturbative, cluster decomposable, relativistic scattering equations of the Faddeev-type integral equations recently presented by Alfred, Kwizera, Lindesay and Noyes. It is therefore anticipated that when so employed, the resulting multi-channel solutions will also be unitary. The process preserves the usual particle-antiparticle symmetries. To illustrate this process, we construct a J=0 scattering length model chosen for simplicity. We also exhibit a class of physical models which contain a finite quantum mass parameter and are Lorentz invariant. These are constructed to reduce in the appropriate limits, and with the proper choice of value and sign of the interaction parameter, to the asymptotic solution of the non-relativistic Coulomb problem, including the forward scattering singularity, the essential singularity in the phase, and the Bohr bound-state spectrum

    Magnetoresistance of UPt3

    Full text link
    We have performed measurements of the temperature dependence of the magnetoresistance up to 9 T in bulk single crystals of UPt3 with the magnetic field along the b axis, the easy magnetization axis. We have confirmed previous results for transverse magnetoresistance with the current along the c axis, and report measurements of the longitudinal magnetoresistance with the current along the b axis. The presence of a linear term in both cases indicates broken orientational symmetry associated with magnetic order. With the current along the c axis the linear term appears near 5 K, increasing rapidly with decreasing temperature. For current along the b axis the linear contribution is negative.Comment: 6 pages, 3 figures, submitted to Quantum Fluids and Solids Conference (QFS 2006

    Anisotropic Aerogels for Studying Superfluid 3^3He

    Full text link
    It may be possible to stabilize new superfluid phases of 3^{3}He with anisotropic silica aerogels. We discuss two methods that introduce anisotropy in the aerogel on length scales relevant to superfluid 3^{3}He. First, anisotropy can be induced with uniaxial strain. A second method generates anisotropy during the growth and drying stages. We have grown cylindrical \sim98% aerogels with anisotropy indicated by preferential radial shrinkage after supercritical drying and find that this shrinkage correlates with small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS). The growth-induced anisotropy was found to be 90\sim90^\circ out of phase relative to that induced by strain. This has implications for the possible stabilization of superfluid phases with specific symmetry.Comment: 6 pages, 4 figures, submitted to Quantum Fluids and Solids (QFS) conference 200

    The evolution of inflorescence diversity in the nightshades and heterochrony during meristem maturation

    Get PDF
    One of the most remarkable manifestations of plant evolution is the diversity for floral branching systems. These "inflorescences" arise from stem cell populations in shoot meristems that mature gradually to reproductive states in response to environmental and endogenous signals. The morphology of the shoot meristem maturation process is conserved across distantly related plants, raising the question of how diverse inflorescence architectures arise from seemingly common maturation programs. In tomato and related nightshades (Solanaceae), inflorescences range from solitary flowers to highly branched structures bearing hundreds of flowers. Since reproductive barriers between even closely related Solanaceae have precluded a genetic dissection, we captured and compared meristem maturation transcriptomes from five domesticated and wild species reflecting the evolutionary continuum of inflorescence complexity. We find these divergent species share hundreds of dynamically expressed genes, enriched for transcription factors. Meristem stages are defined by distinct molecular states and point to modified maturation schedules underlying architectural variation. These modified schedules are marked by a peak of transcriptome expression divergence during the reproductive transition, driven by heterochronic shifts of dynamic genes, including transcriptional regulators with known roles in flowering. Thus, evolutionary diversity in Solanaceae inflorescence complexity is determined by subtle modifications of transcriptional programs during a critical transitional window of meristem maturation, which we propose underlies similar cases of plant architectural variation. More broadly, our findings parallel the recently described transcriptome "inverse hourglass" model for animal embryogenesis, suggesting both plant and animal morphological variation is guided by a mid-development period of transcriptome divergence

    Wanted: cancer boss

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/62915/1/440978a.pd

    Globally Anisotropic High Porosity Silica Aerogels

    Full text link
    We discuss two methods by which high porosity silica aerogels can be engineered to exhibit global anisotropy. First, anisotropy can be introduced with axial strain. In addition, intrinsic anisotropy can result during growth and drying stages and, suitably controlled, it can be correlated with preferential radial shrinkage in cylindrical samples. We have performed small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) to characterize these two types of anisotropy. We show that global anisotropy originating from either strain or shrinkage leads to optical birefringence and that optical cross-polarization studies are a useful characterization of the uniformity of the imposed global anisotropy.Comment: 18 pages, 14 figures, submitted to Journal of Non-Crystalline Solid
    corecore