6 research outputs found
Pre-scald brushing for removal of solids and associated broiler carcass bacterial contamination
The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of brushing prior to scalding on reducing the E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae concentrations on carcasses. Three visits were arranged to a commercial slaughterhouse in which carcasses were cleaned in a separate line. Ten batches were sampled to compare the E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae concentrations on carcasses before and after a stand-alone brushing unit. Per batch, 8 carcasses before and 8 after brushing were sampled by the whole-carcass rinse method. Furthermore, the dry matter content and the pH were determined in these samples, as these parameters indirectly (dry matter) or directly (pH) influence the scalding lethality. Results revealed a small but statistically significant reduction (P < 0.001) in E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae concentrations on the brushed carcasses. The concentrations on whole carcasses were reduced on average by 0.3 log for both E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae. Rinse samples from treated carcasses had significantly less dry matter on average by 2.5 g (P < 0.001) and significantly higher pH by 0.08 units (P < 0.001). Although these differences are statistically significant, they might have rather low biological relevance; thus, further optimization of brushes is needed for more relevant results. This study confirms that brushing reduces bacterial concentrations on carcasses, which may be increased potentially by enlarging the brushed surface of the carcass. Further inline investigations are needed to observe the effect of brushing on bacterial concentrations in scalding water and on carcasses after scalding and at the end of processing
Explanatory Variables Associated with Campylobacter and Escherichia coli Concentrations on Broiler Chicken Carcasses during Processing in Two Slaughterhouses
This study aimed at identifying explanatory variables that were associated with Campylobacter and Escherichia coli concentrations throughout processing in two commercial broiler slaughterhouses. Quantative data on Campylobacter and E. coli along the processing line were collected. Moreover, information on batch characteristics, slaughterhouse practices, process performance, and environmental variables was collected through questionnaires, observations, and measurements, resulting in data on 19 potential explanatory variables. Analysis was conducted separately in each slaughterhouse to identify which variables were related to changes in concentrations of Campylobacter and E. coli during the processing steps: scalding, defeathering, evisceration, and chilling. Associations with explanatory variables were different in the slaughterhouses studied. In the first slaughterhouse, there was only one significant association: poorer uniformity of the weight of carcasses within a batch with less decrease in E. coli concentrations after defeathering. In the second slaughterhouse, significant statistical associations were found with variables, including age, uniformity, average weight of carcasses, Campylobacter concentrations in excreta and ceca, and E. coli concentrations in excreta. Bacterial concentrations in excreta and ceca were found to be the most prominent variables, because they were associated with concentration on carcasses at various processing points. Although the slaughterhouses produced specific products and had different batch characteristics and processing parameters, the effect of the significant variables was not always the same for each slaughterhouse. Therefore, each slaughterhouse needs to determine its particular relevant measures for hygiene control and process management. This identification could be supported by monitoring changes in bacterial concentrations during processing in individual slaughterhouses. In addition, the possibility that management and food handling practices in slaughterhouses contribute to the differences in bacterial contamination between slaughterhouses needs further investigation
Farmers' knowledge and expectations of antimicrobial use and resistance are strongly related to usage in Dutch livestock sectors
Comprehensive strategies to improve on-farm antimicrobial use (AMU) are needed to contain antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Little is known about farmers' motivating and enabling factors, and about their influence on AMU. In a cross-sectional online survey, Dutch dairy, veal and pig farmers (n=457) reported their on-farm AMU as "Defined Daily Dose Animal" per year (DDDAF) and completed a detailed questionnaire on their view, knowledge and behavior towards AMU and AMR. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on the questionnaire items identified four psychological factors labeled as 'referent beliefs', 'perceived risk', 'knowledge', and 'undesired attitude to regulations'. Linear regression was done to explore the relationship between the obtained factors and on-farm AMU across the three animal sectors. Dairy farmers showed the highest factor scores for 'knowledge' and the lowest for 'perceived risk'. 'Knowledge' scores were significantly and inversely related to AMU (P=0.0004). Borderline significant associations with AMU were found for 'perceived risk' and 'undesired attitude to regulations' (negative and positive relationships respectively). There were no apparent differences for these relationships between the three livestock sectors. Behavioral interventions in farmers such as educational campaigns or increased support by veterinarians could empower farmers with more prudent and rational practices, eventually reducing AMU in food animals