Refining associations between TAS2R38 diplotypes and the 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taste test: findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous investigations have highlighted the importance of genetic variation in the determination of bitter tasting ability, however have left unaddressed questions as to within group variation in tasting ability or the possibility of genetic prescription of intermediate tasting ability. Our aim was to examine the relationships between bitter tasting ability and variation at the <it>TAS2R38 </it>locus and to assess the role of psychosocial factors in explaining residual, within group, variation in tasting ability.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In a large sample of children from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, we confirmed an association between bitter compound tasting ability and <it>TAS2R38 </it>variation and found evidence of a genetic association with intermediate tasting ability. Antisocial behaviour, social class and depression showed no consistent relationship with the distribution of taste test scores.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Factors which could influence a child's chosen taste score, extra to taste receptor variation, appeared not to show relationships with test score. Observed spread in the distribution of the taste test scores <it>within </it>hypothesised taster groups, is likely to be, or at least in part, due to physiological differentiation regulated by other genetic contributors. Results confirm relationships between genetic variation and bitter compound tasting ability in a large sample, and suggest that <it>TAS2R38 </it>variation may also be associated with intermediate tasting ability.</p

Identifying Treatments for Taste and Smell Disorders: Gaps and Opportunities.

The chemical senses of taste and smell play a vital role in conveying information about ourselves and our environment. Tastes and smells can warn against danger and also contribute to the daily enjoyment of food, friends and family, and our surroundings. Over 12% of the US population is estimated to experience taste and smell (chemosensory) dysfunction. Yet, despite this high prevalence, long-term, effective treatments for these disorders have been largely elusive. Clinical successes in other sensory systems, including hearing and vision, have led to new hope for developments in the treatment of chemosensory disorders. To accelerate cures, we convened the Identifying Treatments for Taste and Smell Disorders conference, bringing together basic and translational sensory scientists, health care professionals, and patients to identify gaps in our current understanding of chemosensory dysfunction and next steps in a broad-based research strategy. Their suggestions for high-yield next steps were focused in 3 areas: increasing awareness and research capacity (e.g., patient advocacy), developing and enhancing clinical measures of taste and smell, and supporting new avenues of research into cellular and therapeutic approaches (e.g., developing human chemosensory cell lines, stem cells, and gene therapy approaches). These long-term strategies led to specific suggestions for immediate research priorities that focus on expanding our understanding of specific responses of chemosensory cells and developing valuable assays to identify and document cell development, regeneration, and function. Addressing these high-priority areas should accelerate the development of novel and effective treatments for taste and smell disorders

Modern psychophysics and the assessment of human oral sensation

Psychophysical measures attempt to capture and compare subjective experiences objectively. In the chemical senses, these techniques have been instrumental in describing relationships between oral sensation and health risk, but they are often used incorrectly to make group comparisons. This chapter reviews contemporary methods of oral sensory assessment, with particular emphasis on suprathreshold scaling. We believe that these scales presently offer the\ud most realistic picture of oral sensory function, but only when they are used correctly. Using converging methods from psychophysics, anatomy, and genetics, we demonstrate valid uses of modern chemosensory testing in clinical diagnosis and intervention

Psychophysical Measurement of 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) Taste Perception a

The ability to taste 6- n -propylthiouracil (PROP) is genetically determined. PROP tastes moderately bitter to 'medium tasters' (MT), intensely bitter to 'supertasters' (ST), and tasteless to 'nontasters' (NT). The psychophysical method used to characterize PROP status should capture the entire range of perception, while minimizing context, ceiling and other effects. Magnitude estimation successfully captures the variability in PROP perception, but requires normalization and may be difficult to conduct in industrial settings. Two labeled scales were tested as part of three separate studies (S1, S2 and S3) to measure perceived intensity of PROP and sweeteners. All studies included reportedly healthy volunteers aged 21-62 years recruited at Cultor Food Science in Groton, CT. In S1 [ n = 163 (55 males, 108 females)], subjects rated perceived intensity of PROP-saturated paper and sucrose (1.0 M) on the Labeled Magnitude (Green) Scale (LMS) [labeled line with descriptors (no taste-strongest imaginable)]. In S2 [ n = 152 (49 males, 103 females)], subjects rated perceived intensity of sucrose (1.0 M) and PROP solutions (0.001 M,0.0032 M) on the LMS. In S3 [ n = 136 (48 males, 88 females)], subjects rated perceived intensity of sucrose (1.0 M) and PROP solutions (0.001 M, 0.0032 M) on a 9-point category scale (1 = not al all; 9 = extremely). In all experiments, water rinses were included between each tastant and PROP was the final stimulus. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and ANOVA. In S1 and S2, those with higher PROP perception perceived sucrose more intensely [(S1: r = 0.32; p <0.001); (S2: r = 0.25; p <0.01)]. A higher frequency of females were ST than males. Also, the PROP effect on sweet perception was most evident in female ST. This apparent sex difference may be the result of hormonal variation associated with menstruation. As well, in S1 and S2 subjects aged 20-40 years, females had significantly greater variance among sucrose intensity ratings than males ( F = 3.66; p < 0.01), which may be due to hormonal changes with menses. The S3 results failed to show either the positive correlation between PROP and sucrose perception or the sex difference. Thus of the two labeled scales, the LMS appears to be better for assessing PROP perception, as it is continuous and also minimizes ceiling effects. Future research will extend these studies by including sucrose and high intensity sweetener concentration series.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74993/1/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10666.x.pd