In-house validation of MPS-based methods in a forensic laboratory

Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) methods are increasingly applied in forensic casework. However, adequate validation guidelines are lacking. In this work, we describe our in-house validation of the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit (Verogen) for analysis of ancestry- and phenotype-informative SNPs. We also discuss in-house validation of MPS assays in general terms. When validating the SNP assay, we focused on the reliability of SNP genotype calls and the compatibility with commonly analysed sample types. Other issues, for example analytical thresholds and accuracy of the data prediction model were considered to be covered by the developmental validation of the kit. Our study included determination of (1) concordance, (2) limit of detection, (3) matrix effects, (4) repeatability, and (5) contamination risk. In conclusion, the MPS-based SNP assay showed overall adequate performance for single-source samples, with correct genotype calls. We welcome a broad discussion on how to perform in-house validation of MPS-based methods, as this is vital to ensure timely implementation of reliable assays in forensic laboratories

Validation guidelines for PCR workflows in bioterrorism preparedness, food safety and forensics

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the backbone of contemporary DNA/RNA analysis, ideally enabling detection of one or just a few target molecules. However, when analysing food or forensic samples the analytical procedure is often challenged by low amounts of poor quality template molecules and complex matrices. Applying optimised and validated methods in all steps of the analysis workflow, i.e. sampling, sample treatment, DNA/RNA extraction and PCR (including reverse transcription for RNA analysis), is thus necessary to ensure the reliability of analysis. In this paper, we describe how in-house validation can be performed for the different modules of the diagnostic PCR process, providing practical examples as tools for laboratories in their planning of validation studies. The focus is analysis of heterogeneous samples with interfering matrices, with relevance in food testing, forensic DNA analysis, bioterrorism preparedness and veterinary medicine. Our objective is to enable rational in-house validation for reliable and swift quality assurance when results are urgent, for example in the event of a crisis such as a foodborne outbreak or a crime requiring the analysis of a large number of diverse samples. To that end, we explain the performance characteristics associated with method validation from a PCR and biological sample matrix perspective and suggest which characteristics to investigate depending on the type of method to be validated. Also, we include a modular approach to validation within the PCR workflow, aiming at efficient validation and a flexible use of methods