A People-state Negotiation in a Borderland a Case Study of the Indonesia–Malaysia Frontier in Sebatik Island

This paper aims to show the dynamics of the Indonesian – Malaysian border area in Sebatik Island, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Take into account as a background is the territorial dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia over the Ligitan and Sipadan Islands which were awarded to Malaysia by the decision of the ICJ (International Court of Justice) in 2002, which was followed by the dispute over the Ambalat sea block in 2005. Sebatik Island is geographically very strategic since it faces the disputed areas. Therefore the concerns of the Indonesian state with regard to the island pertain to issues of nation-state sovereignty and territorial security, which she tries to safeguard through intensive campaigns. Research conducted in Sebatik in 2009 showed how people willingly reinforced the state by incorporating its programs, despite their ambiguous position as people in a border area, which support they used subsequently in negotiating with the state for their own local purpose

Voices from the Field

This research study sought to determine the impact from participation in a practicum field experience on teacher candidates’ perceived professional dispositions for effective teaching. A further intent was to describe what teacher candidates perceived to be the necessary professional dispositions for effective teaching as they reflected on their experiences in their particular preparation contexts. A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was used to examine and understand the development of dispositions from pre-service teachers’ perspectives. The participants consisted of seventeen middle grade undergraduate students who completed over 200 hours of field experience while attending a mid-size university in the Southeastern region of the U.S. The results of a paired-samples t-test showed there was a statistically significant difference on perceived dispositions for effective teaching before practicum experiences and after practicum experiences. From qualitative data analysis, three categories emerged to understand what the pre-service teachers perceived to be professional dispositions for effective teaching: the context for learning, student advocacy, and professional practices. The voices of the seventeen participants in this study provide valuable insights and implications for other teacher education programs who are involved in the planning and development of professional dispositions

GJR Volume 41 Number 1 Spring 2018

The Georgia Journal of Reading\u27s Spring 2018 issue includes: Letter from the Editor by Lina B. Soares (pg. 4) President’s Page by Ron Reigner (pg. 5) Give the Neurological Impress Method Another Chance for One-to-One Fluency Interventions by Melissa M. Mitchell and Dr. Vassiliki Zygouris-Coe (pg. 6) Building Comprehension through Explicit and Organic Vocabulary Instruction for English Learners by Marisa Gonzalez and Dr. Robert A. Griffn (pg. 13) Children’s Literature to Develop Awareness and Advocacy for Social Justice by Dr. Katie Kelly and Dr. Lindsay Yearta (pg. 22) Maximizing Learning: Embedding Phonological Awareness throughout the Day by Dr. Shawnna Helf, Dr. Lindsay Yearta and Dr. Kavin Ming (pg. 30)https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/gjrarchive/1008/thumbnail.jp

GJR Volume 41 Number 2 Winter 2018

The Georgia Journal of Reading\u27s Winter 2018 issue includes: Letter from the Editor by Lina B. Soares (pg. 4) President’s Page by Davetta Grigsby (pg. 5) Teaching to the Test from a Parent’s Perspective by Amy Kettle and Melinda Miller (pg. 6) Reimagining the Traditional Pedagogy of Literacy by Virginie Jackson and Kinsey Shrewsbury (pg. 11) Engaging Strategies for Developing Reading Competencies by Renee Rice Moran, LaShay Jennings., Stacey J. Fisher and Edward J. Dwyer (pg. 24) Taming the Beast: How I Took Back Guided Reading by Laura Sandling (pg. 30)https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/gjrarchive/1007/thumbnail.jp

GJR Volume 42 Number 1 Summer 2019

The Georgia Journal of Reading\u27s Summer 2019 issue includes: Message From the Chair by Davetta Grigsby (pg. 4) Message from the Editor by Lina B. Soares (pg. 5) Diversity in Literacy Education: How Are Literacy Teacher Educators Preparing Teacher Candidates? by Rebekah E. Piper, Laurie A. Sharp and Roberta D. Raymond (pg.6) Exploring the Reading Motivation of Less-Motivated Adolescent Latinx English Learners by Robert A. Griffn (pg. 18) Ready, Set, Grow: Exploring the Readiness and Preparation of Kindergarten Students within a Title 1 School by Morgan Mitchell, Sybil Keesbury and Vicki Luther (pg. 31)https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/gjrarchive/1009/thumbnail.jp

Kajian Tentang Aplikasi Augmented Reality Berbasis Marker

In this paper, marker detection and pose estimation algorithms are presented for Augmented Reality applications. This marker detection algorithm was designed specially for square-shaped marker. It consists of line detection, corner detection, and square-shaped detection. The pose estimation algorithm is used involving intrinsic and ecstrinsic paramater of camera. The position of a marker can be known from the ectrinsic parameter of camera which is translation and rotation. Translation and rotation ocurr in three coordinate axes, which is x,y,and z.The translation value can be obtained from the midpoint of the marker, and the rotation value can be calculated with rotation matrix. Several experiments have been conducted on various images and video sequences. The results of the experiments show that the algorithms can detect marker in various angles and estimate the pose well that the user of the application can interact with the object from digital world

A people-state negotiation in a borderland: A case study of the Indonesia-Malaysia frontier in Sebatik island

This paper aims to show the dynamics of the Indonesian – Malaysian border area in Sebatik Island, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Take into account as a background is the territorial dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia over the Ligitan and Sipadan Islands which were awarded to Malaysia by the decision of the ICJ (International Court of Justice) in 2002, which was followed by the dispute over the Ambalat sea block in 2005. Sebatik Island is geographically very strategic since it faces the disputed areas. Therefore the concerns of the Indonesian state with regard to the island pertain to issues of nation-state sovereignty and territorial security, which she tries to safeguard through intensive campaigns. Research conducted in Sebatik in 2009 showed how people willingly reinforced the state by incorporating its programs, despite their ambiguous position as people in a border area, which support they used subsequently in negotiating with the state for their own local purpose.KEYWORDSsebatik Island, borderland, negotiation, local people, state