The strategic symbiosis between us Asian policy and Taiwanese nationalism

This thesis explores the influence of us Asian policy on the evolution of Taiwanese nationalism and the role of Taiwanese nationalism in America's Asian policy. The study consists of five parts. The first part (1895-1950) introduces the source of Taiwanese nationalism and America's strategic scheme on Taiwan before 1945, and explores American options after the germination of Taiwanese nationalism. America's intention to separate Taiwan from the mainland so as to deny the island to Chinese Communists late 1948 helped preserve inchoate Taiwanese nationalism. The second part (1950-1970) examines how America simultaneously exploited the Chinese Nationalist regime's anti-communism and facilitated the growth of Taiwanese nationalism in the bipolarized Cold-War era. The Truman administration's separatist intention after the Korean War, US aid and American scholars' Taiwan independence theories had significant implications for the evolution of Taiwanese nationalism. The third part (1970-1989) examines how America reconciled US-PRC rapprochement with its promotion of Taiwanese nationalism. Taiwan's democratisation evolved in the context of US political, economic and military intervention. During the transition to democratisation, secessionists turned political opposition movement into nation-building revolution. The fourth part (1989-2000) examines how US conservatives and Taiwanese nationalists jointly promoted Taiwanization. The dynamics of democratisation, native president Lee Teng-hui's domination of political agenda, the ambience of US-Taiwan strategic realignment and the maturity of political nationalism together facilitated Taiwanization. The fifth part (2000֊present) explores how America and Taiwan establish a strategic symbiosis for US-China strategic competition. The 9/11 Incident has little influence on the course of strategic symbiosis. The consolidation of Taiwan identity obliged thepan-blue camp to identify with Taiwan, promote political nationalism and deviate from their pro-unification ideology. The increased antagonism between Taiwanese nationalism and Chinese nationalism ossifies the symbiotic partnership between USAsian policy and Taiwanese nationalism and hinders China's rise to regional hegemonyand global superpower

China's ocean development strategy and its handling of the territorial conflicts in the South China Sea

Steph Paladini: ORCID: 0000-0002-1526-3589 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1526-3589Item is not available in this repository.China's economic growth leads to an increasingly ambitious ocean development strategy. In addition, China has been more assertive in the South China Sea territorial disputes. In view of the exacerbating “China threat” perception, Chinese leaders attempt to maintain a balance: while building a modern navy, China avoids its deployment in maritime law enforcement and the handling of minor territorial conflicts. Efforts have also been made to de-escalate such conflicts while establishing a deterrence effect. Given such context, the recent Sino-Filipino conflict over the Scarborough Shoal is now presented as a model of the way China asserts its sovereignty claims in territorial disputes. This article considers Chinese foreign policy from a traditional realism approach based on content analysis of existing documents, literature and interviews of Chinese academics in the field. It observes how China's neighbours remain suspicious of Beijing's intentions. It concludes that China's relations with ASEAN have been adversely affected by the recent confrontation, demonstrating its problem of maintaining a balance in the pursuit of multiple foreign policy objectives.https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2014.96547635pubpub