China\u27s Safeguard Measures Under the New WTO Framework

This Essay inquires into the nature of China\u27s new safeguard regulation, its significance in China\u27s new trade regime, and, in the authors\u27 view, some of its shortcomings. Part I gives a brief overview of the purpose of safeguard measures and the place of safeguard regulations in China\u27s new trade regime. Part II describes some of the challenges that China\u27s producers will face in the wake of the newly liberalized domestic market, and observes that the use of safeguard measures will become both necessary and important in the coming years in order to facilitate adjustment to this new environment. Part III, for the benefit of interested readers who do not otherwise have access to Chinese law, provides a brief overview of the primary component of China\u27s safeguard regulation

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Objective To analyze the prognostic value of programmed death factor ligand 1 (PD-L1) in colorectal cancer. Methods Electronic databases, such as PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane library, were searched to identify studies evaluating the PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS) in these patients. Afterwards, the relevant data were extracted to perform the meta-analysis. Results A total of 3481 patients were included in 10 studies. The combined hazard ratio (HR) was 1.22 (95%CI = 1.01–1.48, P = 0.04), indicating that high expression of PD-L1 was significantly correlated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer. Apropos of clinicopathological features, the merged odds ratio (OR) exhibited that highly expressed PD-L1 was firmly related to lymphatic invasion (OR = 3.49, 95%CI = 1.54–7.90, P = 0.003) and advanced stage (OR = 1.77, 95%CI = 1.41–2.23, P < 0.00001), but not correlative with patients’ gender, microsatellite instability, or tumor location. Conclusion The expression of PD-L1 can be utilized as an independent factor in judging the prognosis of colorectal cancer, and patients with advanced cancer or lymphatic invasion are more likely to express PD-L1. This conclusion may lay a theoretical foundation for the application of PD-1/PD-L1 immunoassay point inhibitors but still needs verifying by sizeable well-designed cohort studies

Mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study of 126 patients

Abstract Background Pancreatic fistula is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of a newly developed technique, namely mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy, in comparison with the conventional use of pancreaticojejunostomy after undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods Data was collected from regarding 126 consecutive patients, who underwent the mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy or conventional pancreaticojejunostomy, after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy by one group of surgeons, between the time period of 2005 and 2016. This data was collected retrospectively. Surgical parameters and perioperative outcomes were compared between these two groups. Results A total of 65 patients received mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy and 61 underwent conventional pancreaticojejunostomy. There were no substantial differences in surgical parameters, mortality, biliary leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrojejunostomy leakage, intra-abdominal fluid collection, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, reoperation, and the total hospital costs between the two groups. Pancreatic fistula rate (15 versus 34%; p = 0.013), overall surgical morbidity (25 versus 43%; p = 0.032), and length of hospital stay (18 ± 9 versus 23 ± 12 days; p = 0.016) were significantly reduced after mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy. Multivariate analysis of the postoperative pancreatic fistula revealed that the independent factors that were highly associated with pancreatic fistula were a soft pancreatic texture and the type of conventional pancreaticojejunostomy. Conclusions This retrospective single-center study showed that mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy appears to be a safe technique for pancreaticojejunostomy. It may reduce pancreatic fistula rate and surgical complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Trial registration This research is waivered from trial registration because it is a retrospective analysis of medical records

Polygonatum sibiricum Polysaccharides Attenuate Lipopoly-Saccharide-Induced Septic Liver Injury by Suppression of Pyroptosis via NLRP3/GSDMD Signals

Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response syndrome with high mortality. Acute liver injury is an independent predictor for poor prognosis in septic patients. Polygonatum sibiricum polysaccharides (PSP) have been reported to possess anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective activities. To evaluate the effects of PSP on septic liver injury and demonstrate the potential molecular mechanisms, the septic acute liver injury (SALI) model was established in BALB/c mice via intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We found that PSP treatment could remarkably reduce the 48 h mortality rate of septic mice; alleviate liver histopathologic damage; lower the activity of neutrophil infiltration marker MPO in liver tissue; and decrease the levels of liver function indexes AST, ALT, ALP, and TBIL, inflammatory cytokines TNF&alpha; and IL-6, and pyroptosis-related inflammatory cytokines IL-18 and IL-1&beta; in serum. TUNEL staining and detecting GSDMD-NT protein expression level in liver tissue revealed that PSP could restrain excessive pyroptosis. In addition, PSP treatment reversed the upregulations of mRNA expression levels of the NLRP3/GSDMD signals in the liver. Our results indicated the potential protective role of PSP against SALI by inhibiting pyroptosis via NLRP3/GSDMD signals

Comparison of clinical outcomes between mesh-reinforced pancreatojejunostomy and pancreatogastrostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a cohort study

Abstract Background Postoperative complications, especially postoperative pancreatic fistulas, remain the major concern following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Mesh-reinforced pancreatic anastomoses, including pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) and pancreatogastrostomy (PG), are a new effective technique in PD. This study was conducted to analyze the safety and efficacy of this new technique and to compare the results of mesh-reinforced PJ vs PG. Methods A total of 110 patients who underwent PD between August 2005 and January 2016 were eligible in this study. Perioperative and postoperative data of patients with a mesh-reinforced technique were analyzed. Data were also grouped according to the procedure performed: mesh-reinforced PJ and mesh-reinforced PG. Results Among patients undergoing PD with the mesh-reinforced technique, 42 had postoperative complications, and the comprehensive complication index (CCI) was 32.7 ± 2.5. Only 10% of patients had pancreatic fistula; three were grade A, six were grade B, and two were grade C. Biliary fistula occurred in only 8.2% of patients. Patients undergoing mesh-reinforced PG showed a significantly lower rate of CCI than did mesh-reinforced PJ patients (27.0 ± 2.1 vs 37.0 ± 3.9, p < 0.05). The mesh-reinforced PG was also favored over mesh-reinforced PJ because of significant differences in intra-abdominal fluid collection (5.9% vs 18.6%, p < 0.05) and delayed gastric emptying (3.9% vs 15.3%, p < 0.05). Conclusions PD with the mesh-reinforced technique was a safe and effective method of decreasing postoperative pancreatic fistula. Compared with mesh-reinforced PJ, mesh-reinforced PG did not show significant differences in the rates of pancreatic fistula or biliary fistula. However, CCI, intra-abdominal fluid collection, and delayed gastric emptying were significantly reduced in patients with mesh-reinforced PG

PD-L1 and gastric cancer prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

<div><p>The expression of Programmed cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) is observed in many malignant tumors and is associated with poor prognosis including Gastric Cancer (GC). The relationship between PD-L1 expression and prognosis, however, is controversial in GC. This paper purports to use a meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between PD-L1 expression and prognosis in GC. For this study, the following databases were searched for articles published from June 2003 until February 2017: PubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The baseline information extracted were: authors, year of publication, country where the study was performed, study design, sample size, follow-up time, baseline characteristics of the study population, pathologic data, overall survival (OS). A total of 15 eligible studies covering 3291 patients were selected for a meta-analysis based on specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. The analysis showed that the expression level of PD-L1 was associated with the overall survival in GC (Hazard Ratio, HR = 1.46, 95%CI = 1.08–1.98, P = 0.01, random-effect). In addition to the above, subgroup analysis showed that GC patients with deeper tumor infiltration, positive lymph-node metastasis, positive venous invasion, Epstein-Barr virus infection positive (EBV+), Microsatellite Instability (MSI) are more likely to expression PD-L1. The results of this meta-analysis suggest that GC patients, specifically EBV+ and MSI, may be prime candidates for PD-1 directed therapy. These findings support anti-PD-L1/PD-1 antibodies as a kind of immunotherapy which is promising for GC.</p></div

Begg’s and Egger’s funnel plot with 95% CI for OS publication bias testing.

<p>Begg’s and Egger’s funnel plot with 95% CI for OS publication bias testing.</p

Exploratory subgrouping analysis of heterogeneity.

<p>Exploratory subgrouping analysis of heterogeneity.</p

Correlation of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological characteristics and Begg’s and Egger’s test in subgroup analysis.

<p>Correlation of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological characteristics and Begg’s and Egger’s test in subgroup analysis.</p