134 research outputs found
Prognostic impact of MitraClip in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and functional mitral valve regurgitation: A comprehensive meta-analysis of RCTs and adjusted observational studies
Machine-learning phenotyping of patients with functional mitral regurgitation undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: the MITRA-AI study
Aims Severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) may benefit from mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER), but selection of patients remains to be optimized. Objectives The aim of this study was to use machine-learning (ML) approaches to uncover concealed connections between clinical, echocardiographic, and haemodynamic data associated with patients’ outcomes. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing TEER from 2009 to 2020 were included in the MITRA-AI registry. The primary endpoint and results was a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization at 1 year. External validation was performed on the Mitrascore cohort. 822 patients were included. The composite primary endpoint occurred in 250 (30%) patients. Four clusters with decreasing risk of the primary endpoint were identified (42, 37, 25, and 20% from Cluster 1 to Cluster 4, respectively). Clusters were combined into a high-risk (Clusters 1 and 2) and a low-risk phenotype (Clusters 3 and 4). High-risk phenotype patients had larger left ventriculars (LVs) (>107 mL/m2), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (<35%), and more prevalent ischaemic aetiology compared with low-risk phenotype patients. Within low-risk groups, permanent atrial fibrillation amplified that of HF hospitalizations. In the Mitrascore cohort, the incidence of the primary endpoint was 48, 52, 35, and 42% across clusters. Conclusion A ML analysis identified meaningful clinical phenotypic presentations in FMR undergoing TEER, with significant differences in terms of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations, confirmed in an external validation cohort
Safety and Feasibility of MitraClip Implantation in Patients with Acute Mitral Regurgitation after Recent Myocardial Infarction and Severe Left Ventricle Dysfunction
Patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) after myocardial infarction (MI) have an increased risk of mortality. Transcatheter mitral valve repair may therefore be a suitable therapy. However, data on clinical outcomes of patients in an acute setting are scarce, especially those with reduced left ventricle (LV) dysfunction. We conducted a multinational, collaborative data analysis from 21 centers for patients who were, within 90 days of acute MI, treated with MitraClip due to severe MR. The cohort was divided according to median left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF)-35%. Included in the study were 105 patients. The mean age was 71 ± 10 years. Patients in the LVEF \u3c 35% group were younger but with comparable Euroscore II, multivessel coronary artery disease, prior MI and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Procedure time was comparable and acute success rate was high in both groups (94% vs. 90%, p = 0.728). MR grade was significantly reduced in both groups along with an immediate reduction in left atrial V-wave, pulmonary artery pressure and improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. In-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were not significantly different between the two groups (11% vs. 7%, p = 0.51 and 19% vs. 12%, p = 0.49) and neither was the 3-month re-hospitalization rate. In conclusion, MitraClip intervention in patients with acute severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) due to a recent MI in an acute setting is safe and feasible. Even patients with severe LV dysfunction may benefit from transcatheter mitral valve intervention and should not be excluded
Reply to the letter by Wei et al. regarding the article, “Temporal trends of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention over a span of 12 years”
Percutaneous Atrio-Ventricular Valve Interventions: Contemporary Advances and Remaining Challenges
These are exciting exploratory times for structural/valvular heart interventions [...
“No option” patients for coronary revascularization: the only thing that is constant is change
Acute reduction in left ventricular function following transcatheter mitral edge‐to‐edge repair
BackgroundLittle is known about the impact of transcatheter mitral valve edge‐to‐edge repair on changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the effect of an acute reduction in LVEF on prognosis. We aimed to assess changes in LVEF after transcatheter mitral valve edge‐to‐edge repair for both primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (PMR and SMR, respectively), identify rates and predictors of LVEF reduction, and estimate its impact on prognosis.Methods and ResultsIn this international multicenter registry, patients with both PMR and SMR undergoing transcatheter mitral valve edge‐to‐edge repair were included. We assessed rates of acute LVEF reduction (LVEFR), defined as an acute relative decrease of >15% in LVEF, its impact on all‐cause mortality, major adverse cardiac event (composite end point of all‐cause death, mitral valve surgery, and residual mitral regurgitation grade ≥2), and LVEF at 12 months, as well as predictors for LVEFR. Of 2534 patients included (727 with PMR, and 1807 with SMR), 469 (18.5%) developed LVEFR. Patients with PMR were older (79.0±9.2 versus 71.8±8.9 years; PConclusionsReduction in LVEF is not uncommon after transcatheter mitral valve edge‐to‐edge repair and is correlated with worsened prognosis in patients with PMR but not patients with SMR
Venous Thromboembolism Complicated with COVID-19: What Do We Know So Far?
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and is responsible for the ongoing 2019–2020 pandemic. Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a frequent cardiovascular and/or respiratory complication among hospitalized patients, is one of the known sequelae of the illness. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients are often elderly, immobile, and show signs of coagulopathy. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume a high incidence of VTE among these patients. Presently, the incidence of VTE is estimated at around 25% of patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit for COVID-19 even under anticoagulant treatment at prophylactic doses. In this review, we discuss present knowledge of the topic, the unique challenges of diagnosis and treatment of VTE, as well as some of the potential mechanisms of increased risk for VTE during the illness. Understanding the true impact of VTE on patients with COVID-19 will potentially improve our ability to reach a timely diagnosis and initiate proper treatment, mitigating the risk for this susceptible population during a complicated disease. </jats:p
- …
