Laser shock peening: toward the tse of pliable polid polymers for confinement

This paper presents the first extensive study of the performances of solid polymers used as confinement materials for laser shock applications such as laser shock peening (LSP) as opposed to the exclusively used water-confined regime up to now. The use of this new confinement approach allows the treatment of metal pieces needing fatigue behavior enhancement but located in areas which are sensitive to water. Accurate pressure determination in the polymer confinement regime was performed by coupling finite element simulation and experimental measurements of rear free-surface velocity using the velocity interferometer system for any reflector (VISAR). Pressure could reach 7.6 and 4.6 GPa for acrylate-based polymer and cross-linked polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), respectively. At 7 and 4.7 GW/cm2, respectively, detrimental laser breakdown limited pressure for acrylate and PDMS. These results show that the pressures produced were also as high as in water confinement, attaining values allowing the treatment of all types of metals with LSP and laying the groundwork for future determination of the fatigue behavior exhibited by this type of treated materials

BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model

Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to be able to perform new tasks based on a few demonstrations or natural language instructions. While these capabilities have led to widespread adoption, most LLMs are developed by resource-rich organizations and are frequently kept from the public. As a step towards democratizing this powerful technology, we present BLOOM, a 176B-parameter open-access language model designed and built thanks to a collaboration of hundreds of researchers. BLOOM is a decoder-only Transformer language model that was trained on the ROOTS corpus, a dataset comprising hundreds of sources in 46 natural and 13 programming languages (59 in total). We find that BLOOM achieves competitive performance on a wide variety of benchmarks, with stronger results after undergoing multitask prompted finetuning. To facilitate future research and applications using LLMs, we publicly release our models and code under the Responsible AI License

Intensive insulin therapy implementation by means of planned versus emergent change approach

Background: Nurses' participation in decisions about new care procedures and protocols is potentially of benefit for patient outcomes. Whether nurses' participation in decisions is allowed in the implementation of innovations depends on the implementation approach used for the introduction. A planned change implementation approach does not allow it, an emergent change implementation approach does. Aim: To compare a planned change and an emergent change implementation approach to introduce an intensive insulin therapy to an intensive care unit (ICU). Design: A prospective comparative study in an ICU in the Netherlands of two teams of nurses using either implementation approach. Methods: Pre-introduction of the comparability of the two teams was assessed. The nurse compliance to the protocol was assessed as being nurses' behaviour according to the protocol and leading to acceptable glucose values. The effectiveness of the implementation was assessed by measuring the percentage of patients' glucose values within the target range, the occurrence of hypoglycaemic events and the time to glucose value normalization. Data were collected from December 2007 till January 2009. Results: In the emergent change approach team there was better nurse compliance measurements than in the planned change approach team (83.5% vs 66,8% conform protocol), a better percentage of glucose values in the target range (53,5% vs 52.8%) and a shorter time to glucose value normalization. Conclusion: The implementation approach allowing nurse participation was associated with better nurse compliance and patient outcome measurements. The implementation approach did not conflict with introducing an evidence-based innovation. It was also associated with more effective adaptation of the protocol to changing circumstances

Local Resection and Brachytherapy for Primary Orbital Rhabdomyosarcoma: Outcome and Failure Pattern Analysis

Survival in patients with orbital rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is excellent. Therefore, new local treatment modalities, such as brachytherapy, have been developed to minimize adverse events. Since 1990, patients with orbital RMS and a residual tumor after induction chemotherapy were eligible for resection and brachytherapy. Otherwise patients received external beam radiotherapy. In this study, the authors describe the outcome for 20 patients with primary orbital RMS. The aim was to assess risk factors for treatment failure in this single center cohort. In this retrospective cohort study, the authors reviewed imaging studies, surgery reports, histology reports, and radiotherapy plans in a multidisciplinary setting. The authors included 20 consecutive patients with orbital RMS, treated between 1990 and 2007, (median age: 7.4 years, range: 0.7-16.1; median follow up: 11.5 years). After induction chemotherapy, 12 patients were treated with surgery and brachytherapy, 2 with external beam radiotherapy, and in 5 patients who achieved complete remission, local treatment was withheld. In 1 patient, brachytherapy was incorrectly withheld after delayed surgery. Seven patients relapsed (no local treatment, N = 2; surgery and brachytherapy, N = 2; external beam radiotherapy, N = 2; surgery only, N = 1). The authors found no patient, tumor, or treatment characteristics that predisposed for treatment failure. Ten-year-overall survival and event-free survival were 89% and 65%, respectively. Overall survival in this cohort of orbital RMS patients was good, including surgery and brachytherapy as treatment modality for orbital RMS resulted in an effective local treatment approach with fewer adverse events than external beam radiotherapy. The authors could not identify factors predisposing for treatment failur

Effects of Cell-Saving Devices and Filters on Transfusion in Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Study

Background: Cell-saving devices (CS) are frequently used in cardiac surgery to reduce transfusion requirements, but convincing evidence from randomized clinical trials is missing. Filtration of salvaged blood in combination with the CS is widely used to improve the quality of retransfused blood, but there are no data to justify this approach. Methods: To determine the contribution of CS and filters on transfusion requirements, we performed a multicenter factorial randomized clinical trial in two academic and four nonacademic hospitals. Patients undergoing elective coronary, valve, or combined surgical procedures were included. The primary end point was the number of allogeneic blood products transfused in each group during hospital admission. Results. From 738 included patients, 716 patients completed the study (CS+filter, 175; CS, 189; filter, 175; neither CS nor filter, 177). There was no significant effect of CS or filter on the total number of blood products (fraction [95% confidence interval]: CS, 0.96 [0.79, 1.18]; filter, 1.17 [0.96, 1.43]). Use of a CS significantly reduced red blood cell transfusions within 24 hours (0.75 [0.61,0.92]), but not during hospital stay (0.86 [0.71, 1.05]). Use of a CS was significantly associated with increased transfusions of fresh frozen plasma (1.39 [1.04, 1.86]), but not with platelets (1.25 [0.93, 1.68]). Use of a CS significantly reduced the percentage of patients who received any transfusion (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.67 [0.49, 0.91]), whereas filters did not (0.92 [0.68, 1.25]). Conclusions: Use of a CS, with or without a filter, does not reduce the total number of allogeneic blood products, but reduces the percentage of patients who need blood products during cardiac surgery. (C) 2015 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeon

Consanguineous marriages, pearls and perils: Geneva International Consanguinity Workshop Report

Approximately 1.1 billion people currently live in countries where consanguineous marriages are customary, and among them one in every three marriages is between cousins. Opinions diverge between those warning of the possible health risks to offspring and others who highlight the social benefits of consanguineous marriages. A consanguinity study group of international experts and counselors met at the Geneva International Consanguinity Workshop from May 3 2010, to May 7, 2010, to discuss the known and presumptive risks and benefits of close kin marriages and to identify important future areas for research on consanguinity. The group highlighted the importance of evidence-based counseling recommendations for consanguineous marriages and of undertaking both genomic and social research in defining the various influences and outcomes of consanguinity. Technological advances in rapid high-throughput genome sequencing and for the identification of copy number variants by comparative genomic hybridization offer a significant opportunity to identify genotype-phenotype correlations focusing on autozygosity, the hallmark of consanguinity. The ongoing strong preferential culture of close kin marriages in many societies, and among migrant communities in Western countries, merits an equivalently detailed assessment of the social and genetic benefits of consanguinity in future studies