Queer conversations: improving access to, and quality of, mental health services for same-sex-attracted clients

Lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people have a higher prevalence of psychiatric problems. This is considered as a consequence of marginalisation of homosexuality. Despite much research and literature on lesbian and gay mental health, important questions remain largely unexplored regarding public mental health services (PMHS) for LGB. Two such questions are: Do clients feel able to disclose issues regarding sexual orientation to psychiatric services? How do PMHS services enable or hinder this? Foucauldian discourse analysis was used to explore these questions. Interviews were conducted with 13 same-sex-attracted male clients and 12 LGB staff in PMHS in New Zealand. Findings were that staff in PMHS rarely ask clients about sexual orientation. Correspondingly many clients report considerable difficulty disclosing their sexual orientation in PMHS, even when it is relevant to their mental health issues. The social and systemic conditions which create this barrier to effective treatment for LGB clients are explored. Practical suggestions are made for how staff in PMHS can raise the topic of sexual orientation with clients thereby improving access to and quality of treatment to LGB clients

LGBT in the military : Policy development in Sweden 1944–2014

This article contributes to the growing field of research on military LGBT policy development by exploring the case of Sweden, a non-NATO-member nation regarded as one of the most progressive in terms of the inclusion of LGBT personnel. Drawing on extensive archival work, the article shows that the story of LGBT policy development in the Swedish Armed Forces from 1944 to 2014 is one of long periods of status quo and relative silence, interrupted by leaps of rapid change, occasionally followed by the re-appearance of discriminatory policy. The analysis brings out two periods of significant change, 1971–1979 and 2000–2009, here described as turns in LGBT policy. During the first turn, the military medical regulation protocol’s recommendation to exempt gay men from military service was the key issue. During these years, homosexuality was classified as mental illness, but in the military context it was largely framed in terms of security threats, both on a national level (due to the risk of blackmail) and for the individual homosexual (due to the homophobic military environment). In the second turn, the focus was increasingly shifted from the LGBT individual to the structures, targeting the military organization itself. Furthermore, the analysis shows that there was no ban against LGBT people serving in the Swedish Armed Forces, but that ways of understanding and regulating sexual orientation and gender identity have nonetheless shaped the military organization in fundamental ways, and continue to do so.Funding agencies: Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research [2012-0934]; Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences [FOA10Amund-007, FOA12Amund-010]</p

Heteronormative citizenship: The Howard government's views on gay and lesbian issues

This article analyses recent federal debates regarding gay and lesbian issues, focusing on the Howard government, and drawing attention to the arguably heteronormative nature of many politicians' views. Policy issues analysed include assisted reproductive technology, superannuation rights and censorship. Reference is also made to the Justice Kirby controversy. The article explores the way in which heteronormative arguments not only construct heterosexual citizens as the norm but are also used to discount arguments that discrimination against gay and lesbian citizens is taking place.Carol Johnso