Το λογισμικό SpatialAnalyzer & εφαρμογές του σε προβλήματα βιομηχανικής γεωδαισίας

This paper reports a first study exploring genomic prediction for adaptation of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] to drought-stress (D-ET) and nonstress (W-ET) environment types. The objective was to evaluate the impact of both modeling genotype × environment interaction (G×E) and accounting for heterogeneous variances of marker effects on genomic prediction of parental breeding values for grain yield within and across environment types (ETs). For this aim, different genetic covariance structures and different weights for individual markers were investigated in best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP)-based prediction models. The BLUP models used a kinship matrix combining pedigree and genomic information, termed K-BLUP. The dataset comprised testcross yield performances under D-ET and W-ET as well as pedigree and genomic data. In general, modeling G×E increased predictive ability and reduced empirical bias of genomic predictions for broad adaptation across both ETs vs. models that ignored G×E by fitting a main genetic effect only. Genomic predictions for specific adaptation to D-ET or W-ET were also improved by K-BLUP models that explicitly accommodated G×E and used data from both ETs relative to prediction models that used data from the targeted ET exclusively or models that used all the data but assumed no G×E. Allowing for heterogeneous marker variances through weighted K-BLUP produced clear increments (43–72%) in predictive ability of genomic prediction for grain yield in all adaptation scenarios. We conclude that G×E as well as locus-specific genetic variances should be accommodated in genomic prediction models to improve adaptability of sorghum to variable environmental conditions

In Situ Compatibilization of Biopolymer Ternary Blends by Reactive Extrusion with Low-Functionality Epoxy-Based Styrene Acrylic Oligomer

[EN] The present study reports on the use of low-functionality epoxy-based styrene¿acrylic oligomer (ESAO) to compatibilize immiscible ternary blends made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), polylactide (PLA), and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT). The addition during melt processing of low-functionality ESAO at two parts per hundred resin (phr) of biopolymer successfully changed the soften inclusion phase in the blend system to a thinner morphology, yielding biopolymer ternary blends with higher mechanical ductility and also improved oxygen barrier performance. The compatibilization achieved was ascribed to the in situ formation of a newly block terpolymer, i.e. PHBVb- PLA-b-PBAT, which was produced at the blend interface by the reaction of the multiple epoxy groups present in ESAO with the functional terminal groups of the biopolymers. This chemical reaction was mainly linear due to the inherently low functionality of ESAO and the more favorable reactivity of the epoxy groups with the carboxyl groups of the biopolymers, which avoided the formation of highly branched and/or cross-linked structures and thus facilitated the films processability. Therefore, the reactive blending of biopolymers at different mixing ratios with low-functionality ESAO represents a straightforward methodology to prepare sustainable plastics at industrial scale with different physical properties that can be of interest in, for instance, food packaging applications.This research was funded by the EU H2020 project YPACK (Reference number 773872) and by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities (MICIU) with project numbers MAT2017-84909-C2-2-R and AGL2015-63855-C2-1-R. L. Quiles-Carrillo wants to thank the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sports (MECD) for financial support through his FPU Grant Number FPU15/03812. Torres-Giner also acknowledges the MICIU for his Juan de la Cierva contract (IJCI-2016-29675).Quiles-Carrillo, L.; Montanes, N.; Lagaron, J.; Balart, R.; Torres-Giner, S. (2019). In Situ Compatibilization of Biopolymer Ternary Blends by Reactive Extrusion with Low-Functionality Epoxy-Based Styrene Acrylic Oligomer. Journal of Polymers and the Environment. 27(1):84-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-018-1324-2S8496271Babu RP, O’Connor K, Seeram R (2013) Prog Biomater 2:8Torres-Giner S, Torres A, Ferrándiz M, Fombuena V, Balart R (2017) J Food Saf 37:e12348Quiles-Carrillo L, Montanes N, Boronat T, Balart R, Torres-Giner S (2017) Polym Test 61:421Zakharova E, Alla A, Martínez A, De Ilarduya S, Muñoz-Guerra (2015) RSC Adv 5:46395Steinbüchel A, Valentin HE (1995) FEMS Microbiol Lett 128:219McChalicher CWJ, Srienc F (2007) J Biotechnol 132:296Reis KC, Pereira J, Smith AC, Carvalho CWP, Wellner N, Yakimets I (2008) J Food Eng 89:361Vink ETH, Davies S (2015) Ind Biotechnol 11:167John RP, Nampoothiri KM, Pandey A (2006) Process Biochem 41:759Madhavan Nampoothiri K, Nair NR, John RP (2010) Biores Technol 101:8493Garlotta D (2001) J Polym Environ 9:63Lim LT, Auras R, Rubino M (2008) Prog Polym Sci 33:820Quiles-Carrillo L, Montanes N, Sammon C, Balart R, Torres-Giner S (2018) Ind Crops Prod 111:878Quiles-Carrillo L, Blanes-Martínez MM, Montanes N, Fenollar O, Torres-Giner S, Balart R (2018) Eur Polym J 98:402Witt U, Müller R-J, Deckwer W-D (1997) J Environ Polym Degrad 5:81Siegenthaler KO, Künkel A, Skupin G, Yamamoto M (2012) Ecoflex® and Ecovio®: biodegradable, performance-enabling plastics. In: Rieger B, Künkel A, Coates GW, Reichardt R, Dinjus E, Zevaco TA (eds) Synthetic biodegradable polymers. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, p 91Jiang L, Wolcott MP, Zhang J (2006) Biomacromol 7:199Brandelero RPH, Yamashita F, Grossmann MVE (2010) Carbohyd Polym 82:1102Muthuraj R, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2014) J Polym Environ 22:336Porter RS, Wang L-H (1992) Polymer 33(10): 2019Koning C, Van Duin M, Pagnoulle C, Jerome R (1998) Prog Polym Sci 23:707Muthuraj R, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2017) J Appl Polym Sci 135:45726Ryan AJ (2002) Nat Mater 1:8Wu D, Zhang Y, Yuan L, Zhang M, Zhou W (2010) J Polym Sci Part B 48:756Kim CH, Cho KY, Choi EJ, Park JK (2000) J Appl Polym Sci 77:226Supthanyakul R, Kaabbuathong N, Chirachanchai S (2016) Polymer 105:1Na Y-H, He Y, Shuai X, Kikkawa Y, Doi Y, Inoue Y (2002) Biomacromolecules 3:1179Zeng J-B, Li K-A, Du A-K (2015) RSC Adv 5:32546Xanthos M, Dagli SS (1991) Polym Eng Sci 31:929Sundararaj U, Macosko CW (1995) Macromolecules 28:2647Milner ST, Xi H (1996) J Rheol 40:663Villalobos M, Awojulu A, Greeley T, Turco G, Deeter G (2006) Energy 31:3227Torres-Giner S, Montanes N, Boronat T, Quiles-Carrillo L, Balart R (2016) Eur Polym J 84:693Lehermeier HJ, Dorgan JR (2001) Polym Eng Sci 41:2172Liu B, Xu Q (2013) J Mater Sci Chem Eng 1:9Eslami H, Kamal MR (2013) J Appl Polym Sci 129:2418Loontjens T, Pauwels K, Derks F, Neilen M, Sham CK, Serné M (1997) J Appl Polym Sci 65:1813Ojijo V, Ray SS (2015) Polymer 80:1Frenz V, Scherzer D, Villalobos M, Awojulu AA, Edison M, Van Der Meer R (2008) Multifunctional polymers as chain extenders and compatibilizers for polycondensates and biopolymers. In: Technical papers, regional technical conference—society of plastics engineers, p. 3/1678Utracki LA (2002) Can J Chem Eng 80:1008Al-Itry R, Lamnawar K, Maazouz A (2012) Polym Degrad Stab 97:1898Lin S, Guo W, Chen C, Ma J, Wang B (2012) Mater Des (1980–2015) 36: 604Arruda LC, Magaton M, Bretas RES, Ueki MM (2015) Polym Test 43:27Wang Y, Fu C, Luo Y, Ruan C, Zhang Y, Fu Y (2010) J Wuhan Univ Technol Mater Sci Ed 25:774Wei D, Wang H, Xiao H, Zheng A, Yang Y (2015) Carbohyd Polym 123:275Abdelwahab MA, Taylor S, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2015) Macromol Mater Eng 300:299Sun Q, Mekonnen T, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2016) J Polym Environ 24:23Torres-Giner S, Gimeno-Alcañiz JV, Ocio MJ, Lagaron JM (2011) J Appl Polym Sci 122:914Miyata T, Masuko T (1998) Polymer 39:5515Muthuraj R, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2015) J Appl Polym Sci 132:42189Ren J, Fu H, Ren T, Yuan W (2009) Carbohyd Polym 77:576Torres-Giner S, Montanes N, Fenollar O, García-Sanoguera D, Balart R (2016) Mater Des 108:648Jamshidian M, Tehrany EA, Imran M, Jacquot M, Desobry S (2010) Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 9:552Savenkova L, Gercberga Z, Nikolaeva V, Dzene A, Bibers I, Kalnin M (2000) Process Biochem 35:573Costa ARM, Almeida TG, Silva SML, Carvalho LH, Canedo EL (2015) Polym Test 42:115Zhang K, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2012) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:3091Zhang N, Wang Q, Ren J, Wang L (2009) J Mater Sci 44:250Chinsirikul W, Rojsatean J, Hararak B, Kerddonfag N, Aontee A, Jaieau K, Kumsang P, Sripethdee C (2015) Packag Technol Sci 28:741Auras R, Harte B, Selke S (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 92:1790Sanchez-Garcia MD, Gimenez E, Lagaron JM (2008) Carbohyd Polym 71:235Sanchez-Garcia MD, Gimenez E, Lagaron JM (2007) J Plast Film Sheeting 23:133Lagaron JM (2011) Multifunctional and nanoreinforced polymers for food packaging. In: Multifunctional and nanoreinforced polymers for food packaging. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, p 

Optimizing the procedure of grain nutrient predictions in barley via hyperspectral imaging

Hyperspectral imaging enables researchers and plant breeders to analyze various traits of interest like nutritional value in high throughput. In order to achieve this, the optimal design of a reliable calibration model, linking the measured spectra with the investigated traits, is necessary. In the present study we investigated the impact of different regression models, calibration set sizes and calibration set compositions on prediction performance. For this purpose, we analyzed concentrations of six globally relevant grain nutrients of the wild barley population HEB-YIELD as case study. The data comprised 1,593 plots, grown in 2015 and 2016 at the locations Dundee and Halle, which have been entirely analyzed through traditional laboratory methods and hyperspectral imaging. The results indicated that a linear regression model based on partial least squares outperformed neural networks in this particular data modelling task. There existed a positive relationship between the number of samples in a calibration model and prediction performance, with a local optimum at a calibration set size of ~40% of the total data. The inclusion of samples from several years and locations could clearly improve the predictions of the investigated nutrient traits at small calibration set sizes. It should be stated that the expansion of calibration models with additional samples is only useful as long as they are able to increase trait variability. Models obtained in a certain environment were only to a limited extent transferable to other environments. They should therefore be successively upgraded with new calibration data to enable a reliable prediction of the desired traits. The presented results will assist the design and conceptualization of future hyperspectral imaging projects in order to achieve reliable predictions. It will in general help to establish practical applications of hyperspectral imaging systems, for instance in plant breeding concepts

Influence of crystallinity on gas barrier and mechanical properties of pla food packaging films

Crystallinity is well-known to have major effects on the gas barrier properties. However, its effect on gas barrier properties is often dependant on the studied material and is difficult to anticipate because two aspects of crystallinity have to be considered: the crystallinity degree and the crystalline morphology. PLA is known to recrystallize when heated at a temperature higher than its Tg ("cold" recrystalllisation). Different recrystallized samples have been obtained by compression-molding the extruded films in different conditions of heating. The crystallinity degree and morphology have been investigated and related to the gas barrier properties of the films. Since crystallinity also affects mechanical properties, the yield strength and the elongation at break have been measured