Polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 genes CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP11A1, CYP17A1, CYP19A1 and colorectal cancer risk

BACKGROUND: Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes have the potential to affect colorectal cancer (CRC) risk by determining the genotoxic impact of exogenous carcinogens and levels of sex hormones. METHODS: To investigate if common variants of CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP11A1, CYP17A1 and CYP19A1 influence CRC risk we genotyped 2,575 CRC cases and 2,707 controls for 20 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that have not previously been shown to have functional consequence within these genes. RESULTS: There was a suggestion of increased risk, albeit insignificant after correction for multiple testing, of CRC for individuals homozygous for CYP1B1 rs162558 and heterozygous for CYP1A2 rs2069522 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.80 and OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.00-1.79 respectively). CONCLUSION: This study provides some support for polymorphic variation in CYP1A2 and CYP1B1 playing a role in CRC susceptibility

Search for low penetrance alleles for colorectal cancer through a scan of 1467 non-synonymous SNPs in 2575 cases and 2707 controls with validation by kin-cohort analysis of 14 704 first-degree relatives.

To identify low penetrance susceptibility alleles for colorectal cancer (CRC), we genotyped 1467 non-synonymous SNPs mapping to 871 candidate cancer genes in 2575 cases and 2707 controls. nsSNP selection was biased towards those predicted to be functionally deleterious. One SNP AKAP9 M463I remained significantly associated with CRC risk after stringent adjustment for multiple testing. Further SNPs associated with CRC risk included several previously reported to be associated with cancer risk including ATM F858L [OR=1.48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-2.07] and P1054R (OR=1.42; 95% CI: 1.14-1.77) and MTHFR A222V (OR=0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.97). To validate associations, we performed a kin-cohort analysis on the 14 704 first-degree relatives of cases for each SNP associated at the 5% level in the case-control analysis employing the marginal maximum likelihood method to infer genotypes of relatives. Our observations support the hypothesis that inherited predisposition to CRC is in part mediated through polymorphic variation and identify a number of SNPs defining inter-individual susceptibility. We have made data from this analysis publicly available at http://www.icr.ac.uk/research/research_sections/cancer_genetics/cancer_genetics_teams/molecular_and_population_genetics/software_and_databases/index.shtml in order to facilitate the identification of low penetrance CRC susceptibility alleles through pooled analyses

Assessment of the Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Raynaud's Phenomenon Questionnaire:Item Bank and Short-Form Development

OBJECTIVE: To develop, refine, and score a novel patient-reported outcome instrument to assess the severity and impact of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) in systemic sclerosis (SSc).METHODS: The Assessment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Raynaud's Phenomenon (ASRAP) questionnaire items were developed with patient insight partner support and grounded in the lived patient experience of SSc-RP. ASRAP items underwent formal qualitative assessment and linguistic testing. An international multicenter study was undertaken to field test the preliminary ASRAP questionnaire.RESULTS: A preliminary 37-item ASRAP questionnaire was supplemented with 2 additional items following expert review to enhance content coverage before undergoing formal linguistic testing to optimize readability. Patient cognitive debriefing interviews were undertaken to enhance comprehension, ambiguity, cognitive difficulty, relevance, and content coverage of both the ASRAP items and instructions. We enrolled 420 SSc patients from scleroderma centers in the UK and US over 2 consecutive winters. Factor analysis with item response theory was undertaken to remove redundant and poorly fitting items. The retained 27-item long-form ASRAP questionnaire was calibrated and scored using the graded response model. A fixed 10-item short-form ASRAP questionnaire was developed using computerized adaptive testing simulations.CONCLUSION: The ASRAP questionnaire has been developed with extensive SSc patient input, with items grounded in the lived experience of SSc-RP to ensure strong content validity, with a focus on how patients feel and function. An advanced psychometric approach with expert input has removed redundant and/or poorly fitting items without eroding content validity. Long- and short-form ASRAP questionnaires have been calibrated and scored to permit formal validation.</p

The Assessment of Systemic sclerosis-associated RAynaud's Phenomenon (ASRAP) questionnaire: Item Bank and Short Form Development

OBJECTIVES: To develop, refine and score a novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument to assess the severity and impact of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: The Assessment of Systemic sclerosis-associated RAynaud's Phenomenon (ASRAP) questionnaire items were developed with patient insight partner support and grounded in the lived patient experience of SSc-RP. ASRAP items underwent formal qualitative assessment and linguistic testing. An international multi-center study was undertaken to field-test the preliminary ASRAP questionnaire. RESULTS: A preliminary 37-item ASRAP questionnaire was supplemented with 2 additional items following expert review to enhance content coverage before undergoing formal linguistic testing to optimize readability. Patient cognitive debriefing interviews were undertaken to enhance comprehension, ambiguity, cognitive difficulty, relevance and content coverage of both the ASRAP items and instructions. We enrolled 438 SSc patients from UK and US scleroderma centers over two consecutive winters. Factor analysis with item response theory (IRT) was undertaken to remove redundant and poorly fitting items. The retained 27-item long-form ASRAP questionnaire was calibrated and scored using the graded response model (GRM). A fixed 10-item short-form ASRAP was developed using computerized adaptive testing simulations. CONCLUSION: The ASRAP questionnaire has been developed with extensive SSc patient input, with items grounded in the lived experience of SSc-RP to ensure strong content validity, with a focus on how patients 'feel' and 'function'. An advanced psychometric approach with expert input has removed redundant and/or poorly fitting items, without eroding content validity. Long and short-form ASRAP questionnaires have been calibrated and scored to permit formal validation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Construct validity and reliability of the assessment of systemic sclerosis-associated raynaud’s phenomenon (ASRAP) questionnaire

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of construct validity and reliability of a novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for assessing the severity and impact of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) in systemic sclerosis (SSc).METHODS: An international multicentre study validation study of the 27-item Assessment of Systemic sclerosis-associated RAynaud's Phenomenon (ASRAP) and 10-item short-form (ASRAP-SF) questionnaires. The relationship between ASRAP questionnaires and demographics, clinical phenotype and legacy instruments for assessing SSc-RP severity, disability and pain was assessed. Repeatability was evaluated at 1-week. Anchor-based statements of health status facilitated assessment of ASRAP thresholds of meaning.RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty SSc subjects were enrolled. There was good correlation between ASRAP (and ASRAP-SF) with RP visual analogue scale (VAS) and Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire RP VAS (rho range 0.648-0.727, p&lt; 0.001). Correlation with diary-based assessment of SSc-RP attack frequency and duration was lower (rho range 0.258-0.504, p&lt; 0.001). ASRAP questionnaires had good correlation with instruments for assessing disability, hand function, pain and global health assessment (rho range 0.427-0.575, p&lt; 0.001). Significantly higher ASRAP scores were identified in smokers, patients with active digital ulceration (DU), previous history of DU and calcinosis (p&lt; 0.05 for all comparisons). There was excellent repeatability at 1-week amongst patients with stable SSc-RP symptoms (intra-class coefficients of 0.891 and 0.848, p&lt; 0.001). Patient-acceptable symptom state thresholds for ASRAP and ASRAP-SF were 45.34 and 45.77 respectively. A preliminary Minimally Important Clinical Difference threshold of 4.17 (95% CI 0.53-7.81, p= 0.029) was estimated.CONCLUSION: ASRAP and ASRAP-SF questionnaires are valid and reliable novel PRO instruments for assessing the severity and impact of SSc-RP.</p