88 research outputs found

    Uncertainties and challenges in surgical and transcatheter tricuspid valve therapy: a state-of-the-art expert review

    Get PDF
    Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a frequent and complex problem, commonly combined with left-sided heart disease, such as mitral regurgitation. Significant TR is associated with increased mortality if left untreated or recurrent after therapy. Tricuspid regurgitation was historically often disregarded and remained undertreated. Surgery is currently the only Class I Guideline recommended therapy for TR, in the form of annuloplasty, leaflet repair, or valve replacement. As growing experience of transcatheter therapy in structural heart disease, many dedicated transcatheter tricuspid repair or replacement devices, which mimic well-established surgical techniques, are currently under development. Nevertheless, many aspects of TR are little understood, including the disease process, surgical or interventional risk stratification, and predictors of successful therapy. The optimal treatment timing and the choice of proper surgical or interventional technique for significant TR remain to be elucidated. In this context, we aim to highlight the current evidence, underline major controversial issues in this field and present a future roadmap for TR therapy

    Polymer-based or polymer-free stents in patients at high bleeding risk

    Get PDF
    Background: polymer-free drug-coated stents provide superior clinical outcomes to bare-metal stents in patients at high bleeding risk who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. Data on the use of polymer-based drug-eluting stents, as compared with polymer-free drug-coated stents, in such patients are limited. Methods: in an international, randomized, single-blind trial, we compared polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents with polymer-free umirolimus-coated stents in patients at high bleeding risk. After PCI, patients were treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy, followed by single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was a safety composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year. The principal secondary outcome was target-lesion failure, an effectiveness composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization. Both outcomes were powered for noninferiority. Results: a total of 1996 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive zotarolimus-eluting stents (1003 patients) or polymer-free drug-coated stents (993 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 169 of 988 patients (17.1%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 164 of 969 (16.9%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.1; P = 0.01 for noninferiority). The principal secondary outcome was observed in 174 patients (17.6%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 169 (17.4%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.4; P = 0.007 for noninferiority). Conclusions: among patients at high bleeding risk who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, use of polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to use of polymer-free drug-coated stents with regard to safety and effectiveness composite outcomes. (Funded by Medtronic; ONYX ONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03344653.)

    Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on TAVR Activity: A Worldwide Registry

    Get PDF
    Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had a considerable impact on the provision of structural heart intervention worldwide. Our objectives were: 1) to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) activity globally; and 2) to determine the differences in the impact according to geographic region and the demographic, development, and economic status of diverse international health care systems. Methods: We developed a multinational registry of global TAVR activity and invited individual TAVR sites to submit TAVR implant data before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, the number of TAVR procedures performed monthly from January 2019 to December 2021 was collected. The adaptive measures to maintain TAVR activity by each site were recorded, as was a variety of indices relating to type of health care system and national economic indices. The primary subject of interest was the impact on TAVR activity during each of the pandemic waves (2020 and 2021) compared with the same period pre–COVID-19 (2019). Results: Data were received from 130 centers from 61 countries, with 14 subcontinents and 5 continents participating in the study. Overall, TAVR activity increased by 16.7% (2,337 procedures) between 2018 and 2019 (ie, before the pandemic), but between 2019 and 2020 (ie, first year of the pandemic), there was no significant growth (–0.1%; –10 procedures). In contrast, activity again increased by 18.9% (3,085 procedures) between 2020 and 2021 (ie, second year of the pandemic). During the first pandemic wave, there was a reduction of 18.9% (945 procedures) in TAVR activity among participating sites, while during the second and third waves, there was an increase of 6.7% (489 procedures) and 15.9% (1,042 procedures), respectively. Further analysis and results of this study are ongoing and will be available at the time of the congress. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic initially led to a reduction in the number of patients undergoing TAVR worldwide, although health care systems subsequently adapted, and the number of TAVR recipients continued to grow in subsequent COVID-19 pandemic waves. Categories: STRUCTURAL: Valvular Disease: Aorti

    Preclinical research performed on reanimated/perfused swine kidneys: The Visible Kidney™ methodologies

    No full text
    Abstract Preclinical research remains the essential platform in the development and optimization of medical therapies and advancements in translational medicines. However, specifically to animal research, federal laws, and institutional policies require investigators to apply the principles of the 3R's (replacement, reduction, and refinement). The concept of benchtop models utilizing isolated organs, in which multiple variables can be controlled to recreate human function, has been innovative advancements in preclinical research models that adhere to these principles. More specifically, isolated perfused kidney (IPK) models have been invaluable preclinical tools that have led to numerous advancements over the decades, including understanding renal physiology, pharmacologic therapies, and improvements in renal transplantation. However, pre‐existing IPK models are not without their own limitations, leaving areas for improvement. An isolated perfused kidney apparatus was designed to best recreate human use conditions as a preclinical tool. Porcine renal blocks were chosen over the more commonly used rodent models, due to their greater similarities to human anatomies. Sixteen porcine kidney pairs obtained en bloc were extracted and placed onto an apparatus where aortic flows, pressures, and overall systemic temperatures were controlled. Organ viability was assessed in 10 renal blocks (n = 8 fresh and n = 2 previously frozen specimens) via both urinary flows and compositions at timepoints up to 180 min. Multimodality imaging, which included fluoroscopy, ultrasound, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and video scopes, was also employed to capture internal and external images to determine renal artery orientations and dimensions. Anatomical measurements and viability assessments of porcine renal blocks were successfully achieved in our perfusion model. Renal main artery diameters averaged smaller in our sample size than in human anatomy while also having more superior takeoff angles. Yet, the average lengths of each main segment were comparable to human anatomy: 32.09 ± 7.97 mm and 42.23 ± 7.33 mm in the left and right renal main artery, respectively. Urine production and urine composition of the fresh renal blocks, when compared to the frozen blocks and baseline perfusate, showed kidney viabilities of up to 3 h via excretion and retention of various metabolites. In this paper, we described a protocol for an isolated perfused kidney apparatus using large mammalian renal blocks. We believe this protocol to be an improvement from similar pre‐existing models in better representing human physiologic function while allowing for multimodal imaging. The resulting Visible Kidney™ preclinical model, which has shown viability after isolation and reperfusion, can be a fast and reliable tool for the development of medical devices while also reducing the unnecessary use of animals for research

    Use of the Sideguard (Cappella) stent in bifurcation lesions: a real-world experience.

    Get PDF
    AIMS: The Sideguard(R) stent (Cappella Medical Devices Ltd, Galway, Ireland), is a novel nitinol self-expanding dedicated bifurcation stent that flares proximally at the ostium of the side branch (SB) into a trumpet shape thereby achieving full ostial coverage. The aim of this study is to report the utility and limitations of this stent in patients undergoing treatment to bifurcation coronary lesions in a real-world setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively identified 20 successive patients admitted over a 6-month period in whom there was significant SB disease and who were suitable for a bifurcation procedure. The Sideguard(R) stent was successfully used in all 20 cases including several that would have been technically difficult using conventional bifurcation techniques. We highlight use of this system using five illustrative cases that illustrate its utility and limitations in the treatment of bifurcation lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The Sideguard(R) stent can be used to treat complex bifurcation lesions in a straight forward manner and is not subject to the limitations associated with conventional bifurcation PCI techniques including jailing of the SB ostium and inability to fully cover/scaffold the ostium of the SB
    corecore