Pilot comparison of outcome measures across chemical and surgical experimental models of chronic osteoarthritis in the rat (Rattus norvegicus)

Relatively little work has evaluated both the disease of osteoarthritis (OA) and clinically-relevant pain outcome measures across different OA models in rats. The objective of this study was to compare sensitivity, pain, and histological disease severity across chemical and surgical models of OA in the rat. Stifle OA was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats via intraarticular injection of monoiodoacetate (MIA) or surgical transection of anterior cruciate ligament and/or destabilization of medial meniscus (ACL+DMM or DMM alone). Reflexive (e.g., mechanical and thermal stimuli) measures of sensitivity and non-reflexive assays (e.g., lameness, static hindlimb weight-bearing asymmetry, dynamic gait analysis) of pain were measured over time. Joint degeneration was assessed histologically. Six-weeks post OA-induction, the ACL+DMM animals had significantly greater visually observed lameness than MIA animals; however, both ACL+DMM and MIA animals showed equal pain as measured by limb use during ambulation and standing. The MIA animals showed increased thermal, but not mechanical, sensitivity compared to ACL+DMM animals. Joint degeneration was significantly more severe in the MIA model at 6 weeks. Our pilot data suggest both the ACL+DMM and MIA models are equal in terms of clinically relevant pain behaviors, but the MIA model is associated with more severe histological changes over time potentially making it more suitable for screening disease modifying agents. Future work should further characterize each model in terms of complex pain behaviors and biochemical, molecular, and imaging analysis of the sensory system and joint tissues, which will allow for more informed decisions associated with model selection and investigative outcomes

Face validity of a proposed tool for staging canine osteoarthritis: Canine OsteoArthritis Staging Tool (COAST)

Abstract Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common, progressive degenerative disease of synovial joints. It can develop subsequent to an acquired disorder such as joint trauma but is primarily driven by developmental orthopedic disease in young dogs. Therefore, it is essentially characterised as an early onset but lifelong disease that worsens with age. Early intervention using a multi-modal drug and non-drug approach, with or without surgery as required, has the greatest potential for the most effective management of the disease. Timely implementation of a continuing care plan provides an opportunity to slow the rate of deterioration by reducing the negative impacts of OA-associated pain, encouraging appropriate levels of activity and improving strength and posture. Unfortunately, many dogs are presented to veterinary clinics only when marked behavioural changes are observed and substantial deterioration of the musculoskeletal and somatosensory systems has already occurred. To assist veterinarians with early and stage-specific diagnosis of OA in dogs, the authors present a proposed, practical diagnostic aid called 'COAST' (Canine OsteoArthritis Staging Tool) with face validity. As indicated by the successful implementation of staging systems for other companion animal diseases, it is expected that standardized staging of OA in dogs will help guide disease management plans and improve monitoring. The items used to construct COAST have been developed using consensus opinion of international experts from nine countries, who are actively working in the fields of small animal orthopaedics, anaesthesia and pain management. Further validation (test-retest, discriminatory ability, responsiveness, criterion validation) of the tool under field conditions is now required and the authors invite input

Studies on the development of sensitization to acute surgical pain in the rat and dog

Available from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:DXN004809 / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreSIGLEGBUnited Kingdo

Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain

Introduction: This article reports the content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool designed to Review the quality of Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain and provide guidance as to the strengths and weakness of findings. The CATRAS quality items encompass 3 domains: level of evidence, methodological soundness, and grading of the pain assessment tool. Objectives: To validate a critical appraisal tool for reviewing analgesia studies involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain. Methods: Content validation was achieved using Delphi methodology through panel consensus. A panel of 6 experts reviewed the CATRAS in 3 rounds and quantitatively rated the relevance of the instrument and each of its quality items to their respective domains. Results: Content validation was achieved for each item of the CATRAS and the tool as a whole. Item-level content validity index and kappa coefficient were at least greater than 0.83 and 0.81, respectively, for all items except for one item in domain 2 that was later removed. Scale-level content validity index was 97% (excellent content validity). Conclusions: This 67-item critical appraisal tool may enable critical and quantitative assessment of the quality of individual analgesia trials involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain for use in systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies