21 research outputs found

    Treatment of hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients: The Calcium Acetate Renagel Evaluation (CARE Study)

    Get PDF
    Treatment of hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients: The Calcium Acetate Renagel Evaluation (CARE Study).BackgroundHyperphosphatemia underlies development of hyperparathyroidism, osteodystrophy, extraosseous calcification, and is associated with increased mortality in hemodialysis patients.MethodsTo determine whether calcium acetate or sevelamer hydrochloride best achieves recently recommended treatment goals of phosphorus ≤5.5mg/dL and Ca × P product ≤55mg2/dL2, we conducted an 8-week randomized, double-blind study in 100 hemodialysis patients.ResultsComparisons of time-averaged concentrations (weeks 1 to 8) demonstrated that calcium acetate recipients had lower serum phosphorus (1.08mg/dL difference, P = 0.0006), higher serum calcium (0.63mg/dL difference, P < 0.0001), and lower Ca × P (6.1mg2/dL2 difference, P = 0.022) than sevelamer recipients. At each week, calcium acetate recipients were 20% to 24% more likely to attain goal phosphorus [odds ratio (OR) 2.37, 95% CI 1.28–4.37, P = 0.0058], and 15% to 20% more likely to attain goal Ca × P (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.20–3.86, P = 0.0097). Transient hypercalcemia occurred in 8 of 48 (16.7%) calcium acetate recipients, all of whom received concomitant intravenous vitamin D. By regression analysis hypercalcemia was more likely with calcium acetate (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.8–13.3, P < 0.0001). Week 8 intact PTH levels were not significantly different. Serum bicarbonate levels were significantly lower with sevelamer hydrochloride treatment (P < 0.0001).ConclusionCalcium acetate controls serum phosphorus and calcium-phosphate product more effectively than sevelamer hydrochloride. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that in the absence of hypercalcemia, calcium acetate should remain the treatment of choice for hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients

    Adjusted regressions for main effects model (experimental condition, race/ethnicity, education, income and covariates) for each outcome.

    No full text
    1/<p>Coef. = Coefficient; <b><sup>2/</sup></b>OR = odds ratio; <b><sup>3/</sup></b>Ref = text-only condition; <b><sup>4/</sup></b>Ref = white; <b><sup>5/</sup></b>Ref = >300% federal poverty level; <b><sup>6/</sup></b>Ref = college or more; <b><sup>7/</sup></b>Ref = Opt-in panel; <b><sup>8/</sup></b>Ref = time to smoke - >5 minutes of waking; <b><sup>9/</sup></b>Ref = Ever quit – No; <b><sup>10/</sup></b>Ref = readiness to quit - >30 days; <b><sup>11/</sup></b>Ref = Male; <b><sup>12/</sup></b>Ref = 60 years old or more; <b><sup>13/</sup></b>Ref = West; <b><sup>14/</sup></b>Ref = Not married.</p
    corecore