Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative Agent in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The effect of dexmedetomidine on length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and time to extubation is still unclear.Pertinent studies were independently searched in BioMedCentral, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials (updated February first 2013). Randomized studies (dexmedetomidine versus any comparator) were included if including patients mechanically ventilated in an intensive care unit (ICU). Co-primary endpoints were the length of ICU stay (days) and time to extubation (hours). Secondary endpoint was mortality rate at the longest follow-up available.The 27 included manuscripts (28 trials) randomized 3,648 patients (1,870 to dexmedetomidine and 1,778 to control). Overall analysis showed that the use of dexmedetomidine was associated with a significant reduction in length of ICU stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) = −0.79 [−1.17 to −0.40] days, p for effect <0.001) and of time to extubation (WMD = −2.74 [−3.80 to −1.65] hours, p for effect <0.001). Mortality was not different between dexmedetomidine and controls (risk ratio = 1.00 [0.84 to 1.21], p for effect = 0.9). High heterogeneity between included studies was found.This meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies suggests that dexmedetomidine could help to reduce ICU stay and time to extubation, in critically ill patients even if high heterogeneity between studies might confound the interpretation of these results

A case of malignant insulinoma responsive to somatostatin analogs treatment

Abstract Background Insulinoma is a rare tumour representing 1–2% of all pancreatic neoplasms and it is malignant in only 10% of cases. Locoregional invasion or metastases define malignancy, whereas the dimension (> 2 cm), CK19 status, the tumor staging and grading (Ki67 > 2%), and the age of onset (> 50 years) can be considered elements of suspect. Case presentation We describe the case of a 68-year-old man presenting symptoms compatible with hypoglycemia. The symptoms regressed with food intake. These episodes initially occurred during physical activity, later also during fasting. The fasting test was performed and the laboratory results showed endogenous hyperinsulinemia compatible with insulinoma. The patient appeared responsive to somatostatin analogs and so he was treated with short acting octreotide, obtaining a good control of glycemia. Imaging investigations showed the presence of a lesion of the uncinate pancreatic process of about 4 cm with a high sst2 receptor density. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy and duodenocephalopancreasectomy after one month. The definitive histological examination revealed an insulinoma (T3N1MO, AGCC VII G1) with a low replicative index (Ki67: 2%). Conclusions This report describes a case of malignant insulinoma responsive to octreotide analogs administered pre-operatively in order to try to prevent hypoglycemia. The response to octreotide analogs is not predictable and should be initially assessed under strict clinical surveillance

Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative Agent in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

<div><p>Introduction</p><p>The effect of dexmedetomidine on length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and time to extubation is still unclear.</p><p>Materials and Methods</p><p>Pertinent studies were independently searched in BioMedCentral, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials (updated February first 2013). Randomized studies (dexmedetomidine versus any comparator) were included if including patients mechanically ventilated in an intensive care unit (ICU). Co-primary endpoints were the length of ICU stay (days) and time to extubation (hours). Secondary endpoint was mortality rate at the longest follow-up available.</p><p>Results</p><p>The 27 included manuscripts (28 trials) randomized 3,648 patients (1,870 to dexmedetomidine and 1,778 to control). Overall analysis showed that the use of dexmedetomidine was associated with a significant reduction in length of ICU stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) = −0.79 [−1.17 to −0.40] days, p for effect <0.001) and of time to extubation (WMD = −2.74 [−3.80 to −1.65] hours, p for effect <0.001). Mortality was not different between dexmedetomidine and controls (risk ratio = 1.00 [0.84 to 1.21], p for effect = 0.9). High heterogeneity between included studies was found.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>This meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies suggests that dexmedetomidine could help to reduce ICU stay and time to extubation, in critically ill patients even if high heterogeneity between studies might confound the interpretation of these results.</p></div

Sensitivity analyses of intensive care unit stay and time to extubation.

<p>The overall analyses using weighted mean differences showed a reduction in intensive care unit stay of −0.79 [−1.17 to −0.40] days and a reduction in time to extubation of −2.74 [−3.80 to −1.65] hours in the dexmedetomidine group. It should be noted that the standard mean differences used in this table is not expressed in days or hours.</p><p>Dex: dexmedetomidine; SMD: standardized mean difference; CI: confidence interval; P: p-value; CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; ICU: intensive care unit; NIV: non invasive ventilation.</p><p>duration of mechanical ventilation from randomization until patients were free of mechanical ventilation(including noninvasive).</p

Forest plot for the length of ICU stay.

<p>Overall analysis showed that the use of dexmedetomidine was associated with a significant reduction in length of ICU stay (SMD = −0.48 [−0.78 to −0.18] , p for effect = 0.002, p for heterogeneity <0.001, I2 = 91% with 17 studies and 2,424 patients included). ICU = intensive care unit; CI = confidence interval; SMD = standardized mean difference; N = number; SD = standard deviation; Dex = dexmedetomidine.</p

Doses, sedation scales and target sedation levels.

<p>ICU: Intensive Care Unit; CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass; NA: not available.</p

Funnel plot for the length of ICU stay.

<p>Visual inspection of funnel plots did not identify a skewed or asymmetrical shape for the co-primary endpoints. Quantitative evaluation did not suggest a presence of publication bias, as measured by the Egger's test (p = 0.4) and Peters' test (p = 0.6). ICU = intensive care unit; SE = standard error; SMD = standardized mean difference.</p