Defining near-complete response following (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer: systematic review

This review identified the various terminology, features, and criteria used in the literature to define a near-complete response. This heterogeneity in criteria and features is probably related to the differences in therapeutic aim (watchful waiting versus additional treatment aiming at organ preservation). In the future, more evidence should be gathered that support the use of specific features at response evaluation to define a near-complete response.Background A uniform definition of a clinical near-complete response (near-CR) after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer is lacking. A clear definition is necessary for uniformity in clinical practice and trial enrolment for organ-preserving treatments. This review aimed to provide an overview of the terminology, criteria, and features used in the literature to define a near-CR. Methods A systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA statement. PubMed and Embase were searched up to May 2021 to identify the terminology, criteria, and features used to define a near-CR after (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Studies with no clear cut-off point between a cCR and near-CR, studies using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours, and studies including only complete responders were excluded. Results A total of 1876 articles were found, of which 23 were included. Patients were managed by watchful waiting and/or additional local treatment in 11 and 17 of 23 studies respectively. Response evaluation included digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or endoscopy with MRI in 18 studies. The majority of studies used the term 'near-complete response'. In most studies, minor irregularities or a smooth induration with DRE and a small flat ulcer on endoscopy were considered to indicate a near-CR. On MRI, five studies used features (obvious downstaging with or without heterogeneous/irregular fibrosis on T2-weighted MRI or small spot of high signal on diffusion-weighted imaging), five studies used TNM criteria (ycT2), and four used magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) (mrTRG1-2/mrTRG2) to describe a near-CR. Conclusion The terminology, criteria, and features used to describe a near-CR vary substantially, which can partly be explained by the different treatment strategies patients are selected for (watchful waiting or additional local treatment). A reproducible definition of near-CR is required.Cellular mechanisms in basic and clinical gastroenterology and hepatolog

Features on Endoscopy and MRI after Treatment with Contact X-ray Brachytherapy for Rectal Cancer: Explorative Results

Simple Summary Contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer is applied in selected patients aiming at organ preservation. However, limited data exist on features observed on endoscopy and MRI after treatment with CXB. On endoscopy, features observed in most patients 6 months after CXB are a flat, white scar, indicative for a clinical complete response (cCR), or tumor mass. On MRI, features indicative for a residual tumor are a focal tumor signal on T2W-MRI and a mass-like high signal on DWI. Due to treatment-related features observed early in follow-up, an irregular ulcer on endoscopy and a diffuse "reactive" mucosal signal on DWI, the distinction between a cCR and a residual tumor generally can be made at 6 months of follow-up. These results can help clinicians to interpret imaging features following CXB, ultimately, to identify patients with a cCR for Watch-and-Wait and to identify patients with a residual tumor for subsequent total mesorectal excision. After neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer, contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) can be applied aiming at organ preservation. This explorative study describes the early features on endoscopy and MRI after CXB. Patients treated with CXB following (chemo)radiotherapy and a follow-up of >= 12 months were selected. Endoscopy and MRI were performed every 3 months. Expert readers scored all the images according to structured reporting templates. Thirty-six patients were included, 15 of whom obtained a cCR. On endoscopy, the most frequently observed feature early in follow-up was an ulcer, regardless of whether patients developed a cCR. A flat, white scar and tumor mass were common at 6 months. Focal tumor signal on T2W-MRI and mass-like high signal on DWI were generally absent in patients with a cCR. An ulceration on T2W-MRI and "reactive" mucosal signal on DWI were observed early in follow-up regardless of the final tumor response. The distinction between a cCR and a residual tumor generally can be made at 6 months. Features associated with a residual tumor are tumor mass on endoscopy, focal tumor signal on T2W-MRI, and mass-like high signal on DWI. Early recognition of these features is necessary to identify patients who will not develop a cCR as early as possible.Cellular mechanisms in basic and clinical gastroenterology and hepatolog

The Effects of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings on Clinical Practice for Colorectal, Lung, Prostate and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our systematic review is to identify the effects of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) for lung, breast, colorectal and prostate cancer. METHODS: Our systematic review, performed following PRISMA guidelines, included studies examining the impact of MDTMs on treatment decisions, patient and process outcomes. Electronic databases PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for articles published between 2000 and 2020. Risk of bias and level of evidence were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and GRADE scale. RESULTS: 41 of 13,246 articles were selected, evaluating colorectal (21), lung (10), prostate (6) and breast (4) cancer. Results showed that management plans were changed in 1.6-58% of cases after MDTMs. Studies reported a significant impact of MDTMs on surgery type, and a reduction of overall performed surgery after MDTM. Results also suggest that CT and MRI imaging significantly increased after MDTM implementation. Survival rate increased significantly with MDTM discussions according to twelve studies, yet three studies did not show significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Despite heterogeneous data, MDTMs showed a significant impact on management plans, process outcomes and patient outcomes. To further explore the impact of MDTMs on the quality of healthcare, high-quality research is needed

Radiomics for the Prediction of Treatment Outcome and Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Prediction of outcome in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is challenging as a result of lack of a robust biomarker and heterogeneity between and within tumors. The aim of this review was to assess the current possibilities and limitations of radiomics (on computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and positron emission tomography [PET]) for the prediction of treatment outcome and long-term outcome in CRC. Medline/PubMed was searched up to August 2020 for studies that used radiomics for the prediction of response to treatment and survival in patients with CRC (based on pretreatment imaging). The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) were used for quality assessment. A total of 76 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for further analysis. Radiomics analyses were performed on MRI in 41 studies, on CT in 30 studies, and on F-18-FDG-PET/CT in 10 studies. Heterogeneous results were reported regarding radiomics methods and included features. High-quality studies (n = 13), consisting mainly of MRI-based radiomics to predict response in rectal cancer, were able to predict response with good performance. Radiomics literature in CRC is highly heterogeneous, but it nonetheless holds promise for the prediction of outcome. The most evidence is available for MRI-based radiomics in rectal cancer. Future radiomics research in CRC should focus on independent validation of existing models rather than on developing new models. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Defining near-complete response following (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer: systematic review

This review identified the various terminology, features, and criteria used in the literature to define a near-complete response. This heterogeneity in criteria and features is probably related to the differences in therapeutic aim (watchful waiting versus additional treatment aiming at organ preservation). In the future, more evidence should be gathered that support the use of specific features at response evaluation to define a near-complete response.Background A uniform definition of a clinical near-complete response (near-CR) after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer is lacking. A clear definition is necessary for uniformity in clinical practice and trial enrolment for organ-preserving treatments. This review aimed to provide an overview of the terminology, criteria, and features used in the literature to define a near-CR. Methods A systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA statement. PubMed and Embase were searched up to May 2021 to identify the terminology, criteria, and features used to define a near-CR after (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Studies with no clear cut-off point between a cCR and near-CR, studies using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours, and studies including only complete responders were excluded. Results A total of 1876 articles were found, of which 23 were included. Patients were managed by watchful waiting and/or additional local treatment in 11 and 17 of 23 studies respectively. Response evaluation included digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or endoscopy with MRI in 18 studies. The majority of studies used the term 'near-complete response'. In most studies, minor irregularities or a smooth induration with DRE and a small flat ulcer on endoscopy were considered to indicate a near-CR. On MRI, five studies used features (obvious downstaging with or without heterogeneous/irregular fibrosis on T2-weighted MRI or small spot of high signal on diffusion-weighted imaging), five studies used TNM criteria (ycT2), and four used magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) (mrTRG1-2/mrTRG2) to describe a near-CR. Conclusion The terminology, criteria, and features used to describe a near-CR vary substantially, which can partly be explained by the different treatment strategies patients are selected for (watchful waiting or additional local treatment). A reproducible definition of near-CR is required

Mandatory imaging cuts costs and reduces the rate of unnecessary surgeries in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of having appendicitis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether mandatory imaging is an effective strategy in suspected appendicitis for reducing unnecessary surgery and costs. METHODS: In 2010, guidelines were implemented in The Netherlands recommending the mandatory use of preoperative imaging to confirm/refute clinically suspected appendicitis. This retrospective study included 1,556 consecutive patients with clinically suspected appendicitis in 2008-2009 (756 patients/group I) and 2011-2012 (800 patients/group II). Imaging use (none/US/CT and/or MRI) was recorded. Additional parameters were: complications, medical costs, surgical and histopathological findings. The primary study endpoint was the number of unnecessary surgeries before and after guideline implementation. RESULTS: After clinical examination by a surgeon, 509/756 patients in group I and 540/800 patients in group II were still suspected of having appendicitis. In group I, 58.5% received preoperative imaging (42% US/12.8% CT/3.7% both), compared with 98.7% after the guidelines (61.6% US/4.4% CT/ 32.6% both). The percentage of unnecessary surgeries before the guidelines was 22.9%. After implementation, it dropped significantly to 6.2% (p from 2,482 to 1,888 (CL:-1081; -143). CONCLUSION: Increased use of imaging in the diagnostic work-up of patients with clinically suspected appendicitis reduced the rate of negative appendectomies, surgical complications and costs. KEY POINTS: * The 2010 Dutch guidelines recommend mandatory imaging in the work-up of appendicitis. * This led to a considerable increase in the use of preoperative imaging. * Mandatory imaging led to reduction in unnecessary surgeries and surgical complications. * Use of mandatory imaging seems to reduce health care costs