Supramodal sentence processing in the human brain: fMRI evidence for the influence of syntactic complexity in more than 200 participants

This study investigated two questions. One is: To what degree is sentence processing beyond single words independent of the input modality (speech vs. reading)? The second question is: Which parts of the network recruited by both modalities is sensitive to syntactic complexity? These questions were investigated by having more than 200 participants read or listen to well-formed sentences or series of unconnected words. A largely left-hemisphere frontotemporoparietal network was found to be supramodal in nature, i.e., independent of input modality. In addition, the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and the left posterior middle temporal gyrus (LpMTG) were most clearly associated with left-branching complexity. The left anterior temporal lobe (LaTL) showed the greatest sensitivity to sentences that differed in right-branching complexity. Moreover, activity in LIFG and LpMTG increased from sentence onset to end, in parallel with an increase of the left-branching complexity. While LIFG, bilateral anterior temporal lobe, posterior MTG, and left inferior parietal lobe (LIPL) all contribute to the supramodal unification processes, the results suggest that these regions differ in their respective contributions to syntactic complexity related processing. The consequences of these findings for neurobiological models of language processing are discussed

Supramodal Sentence Processing in the Human Brain: fMRI Evidence for the Influence of Syntactic Complexity in More Than 200 Participants

This study investigated two questions. One is: To what degree is sentence processing beyond single words independent of the input modality (speech vs. reading)? The second question is: Which parts of the network recruited by both modalities is sensitive to syntactic complexity? These questions were investigated by having more than 200 participants read or listen to well-formed sentences or series of unconnected words. A largely left-hemisphere frontotemporoparietal network was found to be supramodal in nature, i.e., independent of input modality. In addition, the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and the left posterior middle temporal gyrus (LpMTG) were most clearly associated with left-branching complexity. The left anterior temporal lobe showed the greatest sensitivity to sentences that differed in right-branching complexity. Moreover, activity in LIFG and LpMTG increased from sentence onset to end, in parallel with an increase of the left-branching complexity. While LIFG, bilateral anterior temporal lobe, posterior MTG, and left inferior parietal lobe all contribute to the supramodal unification processes, the results suggest that these regions differ in their respective contributions to syntactic complexity related processing. The consequences of these findings for neurobiological models of language processing are discussed

DNA functionalized soft materials: preparation, biophysical properties and analytical applications.

Bio-nanotechnology is the use of biomolecules to control both the structure and property of nanomaterials. No biomolecule has been employed more often than DNA as exemplified in the numerous demonstrations of DNA-directed assembly of nanomaterials. DNA has been used to covalently functionalize and assemble soft nanoparticles (e.g. liposomes) and hard nanoparticles (e.g. gold and silica nanoparticles) into a variety of hierarchical nanostructures. The majority of previous work however has focused on the latter, i.e., the assembly of “hard” nanoparticles such as gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as oppose to the assembly of soft materials. The primary focus of this thesis is to add to the growing field of DNA-directed assembly of soft materials owing to the promise of such materials in a variety of analytical and biomedical applications. The first class of soft materials considered are liposomes which interestingly can be deformed by relatively weak intermolecular forces. In addition, DNA anchored to its surface can readily diffuse laterally within the lipid bilayer while DNA attached to inorganic nanoparticles remain fixed in position. We systematically consider the effect of varying the liposome structure, size, charge, and fluidity on liposome assemblies, in chapter 2. In addition, the interesting properties of liposomes are highlighted by a side-by-side comparison to DNA-functionalized gold nanoparticles, offering fundamental insights into DNA-directed assembly. Furthermore, hybrid DNA-directed assemblies composed of both AuNPs and liposomes are described in Chapter 3. In particular, the photothermal effects of such DNA-coupled liposome and AuNP assemblies were modulated by controlling the distance between liposome and AuNP allowing such systems to have potential application in drug-delivery. In chapter 4, the utility of liposomes is demonstrated as we exploit the fluidity of its diffuse bilayer with split aptamer functionalization for the rapid and selective detection of metabolites. The second class of soft material of interest in this thesis are hydrogels, which are cross-linked hydrophilic polymers. Because hydrogels are swollen in water, they can be used to immobilize biomolecules such as DNA for a myriad of applications. In chapter 5, the preparation and characterization of DNA-functionalized polyacrylamide hydrogels are presented. The use of such a DNA-modified hydrogel for the simultaneous detection and removal of mercury from water is subsequently demonstrated

Hoogbegaafdheid: Het label voorbij

Item does not contain fulltextKinderen en jongeren labelen als 'hoogbegaafd' leidt tot misverstanden en is strijdig met actuele psychologische inzichten. De psychologische diversiteit onder 'hoogbegaafden' is indrukwekkender dan de overeenstemming en er is onvoldoende empirische steun voor 'hoogbegaafdheid' als afzonderlijke categorie. Feitelijk is het (nog) onduidelijk wat 'hoogbegaafdheid' precies is en identificatie van 'hoogbegaafdheid' door een intelligentietest alleen is niet mogelijk. Met deze stellingen willen we onderzoek naar 'hoogbegaafdheid' niet ontmoedigen, maar veel meer de nodige ruimte geven. We blijven voorstanders van het gebruik van een aangepast (leerstof)aanbod. Het stoppen met het labelen biedt wellicht meer kansen voor kinderen die op cognitief gebied sterk afwijken van het gemiddelde in hun directe omgeving, groep of klas. Wij richten de aandacht niet op een statisch label ('hoogbegaafdheid'), maar accentueren het psychologisch proces, waarin kinderen hun vermogen en talent kunnen ontwikkelen naar een expertniveau. Dit door adequate stimulering en de actieve inspanning van deze kinderen zelf.6 p