The interleukin 1 receptor antagonist anakinra to reduce disease severity of palmoplantar pustulosis in adults: APRICOT RCT and PLUM mechanistic study

Background: Palmoplantar pustulosis is a rare, debilitating, chronic skin disease involving the hands and feet, and there are limited treatment options. Mechanistic findings suggest that interleukin 1 may be a pathogenic driver. // Objective: To determine whether or not anakinra [Sobi (Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB), Stockholm, Sweden], an interleukin 1 receptor antagonist, delivers therapeutic benefit in palmoplantar pustulosis. // Design: A Phase IV, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with two stages and an adaptive element (24 participants in stage 1, 64 participants in total) with an open-label extension. // Setting: Sixteen hospitals across England, Scotland and Wales. // Participants: Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of palmoplantar pustulosis and a disease duration of > 6 months and of sufficient impact and severity to require systemic therapy. // Interventions Participants were randomised (1 : 1) to daily self-administered subcutaneous injection of either anakinra or a placebo for 8 weeks. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index score measured at 0, 1, 4, 8 and 12 weeks, with the primary end point at 8 weeks adjusted for baseline. Secondary outcomes included other investigator-assessed efficacy measures of disease severity, safety measures and participant-reported measures of efficacy and impact. Results A total of 64 participants (mean baseline Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index score of 17.8, standard deviation 10.5) received anakinra (n = 31) or the placebo (n = 33). In the primary intention-to-treat analysis, which estimated the effect of the treatment policy, the mean treatment group difference at 8 weeks after adjustment for baseline Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index score was –1.65 (95% confidence interval –4.77 to 1.47; p = 0.300), in favour of anakinra relative to placebo, but was not statistically significant. Similarly, secondary investigator-assessed outcomes did not show statistical superiority of anakinra: the baseline-adjusted mean difference in fresh pustule count (palms and soles) between the anakinra group and the placebo group was 2.94 (95% confidence interval –26.44 to 32.33), in favour of placebo, and the mean difference in total pustule count was –30.08 (95% confidence interval –83.20 to 23.05), in favour of anakinra. Participant-assessed outcomes were consistent with these objective findings: the baseline-adjusted mean difference in Dermatology Life Quality Index between the anakinra group and the placebo group was 0.52 (95% confidence interval –2.04 to 3.07), in favour of placebo, and the mean difference in Palmoplantar Quality-of-Life Index was 1.27 (95% confidence interval –3.04 to 5.57), in favour of placebo. However, the proportion of participants who strongly agreed that treatment was worthwhile was greater in the anakinra group (12/29, 41%) than in the placebo group (4/28, 14%), a difference in proportion of 27% (95% confidence interval 5% to 49%). In the complier-average causal effect analysis, the baseline-adjusted mean treatment group difference in the week 8 Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index score in individuals who received ≥ 50% of injections was –2.30 (95% confidence interval –6.54 to 1.93; p = 0.287) and in those who received ≥ 90% of injections was –3.80 (95% confidence interval –10.76 to 3.16; p = 0.285), in favour of anakinra. No serious infections, significant neutropenia or other serious adverse events occurred. Injection site reactions were more frequent for those receiving anakinra (19/31, 61%) than for those receiving placebo (1/33, 3%). // Conclusions: There was no evidence that anakinra was superior to placebo. For the treatment of palmoplantar pustulosis, interleukin 1 blockade is not a useful intervention. // Limitations: The sample size was calculated to detect a large effect size. Treatment adherence was lower than expected. It cannot be ruled out that there was some selection bias towards less severe or unstable participants entering the trial given that the trial was placebo controlled with a required washout period. // Future work: Palmoplantar pustulosis remains an area of high unmet need and further research is recommended to (1) identify new drug targets, (2) determine the contributory role of drug exposure (including pharmacokinetics and adherence) and (3) validate outcome measures in palmoplantar pustulosis. // Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISCRTN13127147 and EudraCT 2015-003600-23. // Funding: This project was funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme, a MRC and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) partnership. This will be published in full in Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation; Vol. 9, No. 2. See the NIHR Journals Library for further project information

Complete responses in AL amyloidosis are unequal: the impact of free light chain mass spectrometry in AL amyloidosis

Amyloidogenic serum free light chains (sFLCs) drive disease progression in AL amyloidosis. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry–based FLC assay (FLC-MS) has greater sensitivity than conventional sFLC assays allowing for the detection of serological residual disease. We report the utility of FLC-MS in a large series of patients with AL amyloidosis assessing the impact of FLC-MS negativity after treatment on overall survival (OS) and organ response rates. Serum samples were analyzed using FLC-MS at diagnosis and at 6 and 12 months after treatment. The impact of FLC-MS negativity over standard hematologic responses on survival and organ response was assessed. A total of 487 patients were included; 290 (59%) and 349 (71.5%) had cardiac and renal involvement, respectively. There was 100% concordance between the light chain (LC) fibril type and LC isotype identified by FLC-MS. At 6 and 12 months, 81 (16.6%) and 101 (20.7%) were FLC-MS negative. Of those achieving a conventional hematologic complete response (CR) at 6 and 12 months, 45 (27.7%) and 64 (39%) were FLC-MS negative. At 12 months, median OS for CR + FLC-MS negative was not reached vs 108 months in CR + FLC-MS positive (P = .024). At 12 months, 70% of patients with FLC-MS negativity (vs 50% FLC-MS positive) achieved a cardiac response (P = .015). In a multivariate analysis, FLC-MS negativity at 12 months was an independent predictor of better outcomes. FLC-MS can detect persistent monoclonal light chains in a significant proportion of patients in a conventional hematologic CR. FLC-MS assessment promises to be a new standard for response assessment in AL amyloidosis

Cytokines and inflammatory mediators: 25. Certolizumab Pegol has a Different Profile from the other Anti-TNFS, Including Golimumab, in a Variety of in Vitro Assays

Background: Activities of the anti-TNFs, certolizumab pegol (CZP), etanercept (ETA), infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA), have been compared in a range of in vitro assays. CZP is the only licensed PEGylated Fab' anti-TNF; ETA is a fusion protein with an IgG1 Fc, and IFX and ADA are both antibodies with an IgG1 Fc. Golimumab (GLM) is a monoclonal IgG1 TNF inhibitor recently approved for a number of indications; it is thus of interest to assess the in vitro activity of GLM. In vitro assays previously used were neutralisation of TNF in the L929 bioassay, inhibition of LPS-driven cytokine production by monocytes, induction of apoptosis in activated lymphocytes and monocytes, and induction of neutrophil necrosis. Methods: Neutralisation of human TNF was assessed in the L929 bioassay using a range of concentrations of the anti-TNFs and a fixed concentration of TNF (100 pg/mL). Activity of the anti-TNFs at inhibiting LPS-driven IL-1β secretion by monocytes was assessed by incubating peripheral blood monocytes with various concentrations of the anti-TNF for 1 hour (hr) and then washing the cells. LPS was added for 4 hrs, the supernatants collected and the IL-1β level measured by ELISA. To assess induction of apoptosis, peripheral blood lymphocytes were activated for 2 days with 2 μg/mL CD3/CD28 and monocytes with 300 U/mL IL-4 and GMCSF for 3 days. The effect of the anti-TNFs on apoptosis was assessed by Annexin V staining using flow cytometry 24 hrs later. The effect of the anti-TNFs on neutrophil necrosis was determined by measuring myeloperoxidase release after 12 hrs. An isotype-matched control was used in all assays except the L929 bioassay. Results: IC90 neutralisation activity of the anti-TNFs in the L929 bioassay was 0.3 ng/mL for ETA, 4 ng/mL for GLM, 15 ng/mL for ADA, and 20 ng/mL for IFX, compared with 2.5 ng/mL for CZP. CZP was the most potent inhibitor of LPS-driven IL-1β secretion (IC50 ∼0.1 ng/mL), followed by GLM (20 ng/mL) and IFX (50 ng/mL). GLM, ADA, IFX and ETA induced apoptosis of monocytes and lymphocytes to a similar degree reaching a level of 23% and ∼40% at 100 μg/mL, respectively. CZP caused no increase in apoptosis above the levels seen with the isotype-matched control. In the neutrophil necrosis assay, ADA,IFX and GLM caused ∼70% necrosis at 100 μg/mL, and ETA 48%. CZP did not increase the level of necrosis above the level of the control. Conclusions: Bioactivity of the IgG1 molecules GLM, IFX and ADA in neutralising human TNF was inferior to that of CZP and ETA. CZP, the only PEGylated anti-TNF, had a different profile to the other anti-TNFs as it was the most potent at inhibiting LPS-driven IL-1β production by monocytes, did not induce apoptosis of activated monocytes and lymphocytes, and did not cause neutrophil necrosis. The clinical relevance of these in vitro effects is unknown. Nevertheless, these assays show interesting in vitro differences between the anti-TNFs. Disclosure statement: G.F. and A.N. are employees of UC

Miscellaneous Rheumatic Diseases [73-83]: 73. Is There a Delay in Specialist Referral of Hot Swollen Joint?

Background: Patients with acute, hot, swollen joints commonly present to general practitioners, emergency departments and/or acute admitting teams rather than directly to rheumatology. It is imperative to consider septic arthritis in the differential diagnosis of these patients. The British Society of Rheumatology (BSR) has produced guidelines for the management of this condition, which include recommendations for early specialist referral and joint aspiration of all patients with suspected septic arthritis. We examined whether the initial management of patients with acute hot swollen joint(s) at University College London Hospital (UCLH) follows BSR guidelines. Methods: For the period Feb to Nov 2009, appropriate patients were identified by searching the UCLH database using the diagnostic terms, "pyogenic arthritis”, "septic arthritis” and "gout”; and from all joint aspirate requests sent to microbiology. Medical notes were obtained and any patients who had elective arthroscopies or chronic (> 6 weeks) symptoms were excluded. Data were collected on the time taken from the onset of symptoms to specialist (orthopaedic/rheumatology) referral and joint aspiration, collection of blood cultures and antibiotic treatment with or without microbiology advice. Results: Twenty patients were identified with hot swollen (18 monoarticular, 3 prosthetic) joint(s) of < 2 weeks duration. Of whom, 3/20 (15%) were admitted directly to rheumatology, 7/20 (35%) to the acute admissions unit, 3/20 (15%) to orthopaedic, 4/20 (20%) to a medical team and 1/20 (5%) to general surgery. In 19 (95%) cases, specialist (rheumatology/orthopaedic) advice was sought. Of 14 cases not seen directly by specialists 9 (64%) were referred at 24-48 h and 5 (36%) at 48-192 h. All 20 patients had joint aspiration. In 9/20 (45%) of cases, joint aspiration was performed in less than 6 h, 3/20 (15%) cases at 6-24h and 6/20 (30%) cases at 24-192 h and was not recorded in two patients. Of these, crystals were identified in two and one was culture positive. Blood cultures were received for only 6/20 (30%) of cases and only clearly documented to have been taken prior to antibiotic therapy and none were positive. Of 14/20 (70%) started on antibiotic treatment empirically, only 6 (42%) were preceded by joint aspiration. In the 6 patients not treated with antibiotics due to low index of suspicion of septic arthritis, synovial fluid and blood cultures were negative. Microbiology advice was sought in 10/20 (50%) of cases by the admitting teams but the timing of this advice is unclear. Conclusions: Despite the provision of 24 h rheumatology and orthopaedic cover at UCLH, we found a significant delay in acute medical firms seeking specialist advice on the management of patients with acute, hot swollen joints with subsequent deviation from BSR guidelines. Consequently, we plan to increase awareness of these guidelines amongst medical firms at UCLH. Disclosure statement: All authors have declared no conflicts of interes

Characterisation, monitoring and treatment of sytemic amyoidosis

EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

Proceedings Of The 23Rd Paediatric Rheumatology European Society Congress: Part Two

PubMe