18 research outputs found
The role of multiple marks in epigenetic silencing and the emergence of a stable bivalent chromatin state
We introduce and analyze a minimal model of epigenetic silencing in budding
yeast, built upon known biomolecular interactions in the system. Doing so, we
identify the epigenetic marks essential for the bistability of epigenetic
states. The model explicitly incorporates two key chromatin marks, namely H4K16
acetylation and H3K79 methylation, and explores whether the presence of
multiple marks lead to a qualitatively different systems behavior. We find that
having both modifications is important for the robustness of epigenetic
silencing. Besides the silenced and transcriptionally active fate of chromatin,
our model leads to a novel state with bivalent (i.e., both active and
silencing) marks under certain perturbations (knock-out mutations, inhibition
or enhancement of enzymatic activity). The bivalent state appears under several
perturbations and is shown to result in patchy silencing. We also show that the
titration effect, owing to a limited supply of silencing proteins, can result
in counter-intuitive responses. The design principles of the silencing system
is systematically investigated and disparate experimental observations are
assessed within a single theoretical framework. Specifically, we discuss the
behavior of Sir protein recruitment, spreading and stability of silenced
regions in commonly-studied mutants (e.g., sas2, dot1) illuminating the
controversial role of Dot1 in the systems biology of yeast silencing.Comment: Supplementary Material, 14 page
An Intervention to Reduce HIV Risk Behavior of Substance-Using Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Two-Group Randomized Trial with a Nonrandomized Third Group
In a randomized trial of a behavioral intervention among substance-using men who have sex with men, aimed at reducing sexual risk behavior, Mansergh and colleagues fail to find evidence of a reduction in risk from the intervention
Effects of school-based interventions on mental health stigmatization: a systematic review
Stigmatizing, or discriminatory, perspectives and behaviour, which target individuals on the basis of their mental health, are observed in even the youngest school children. We conducted a systematic review of the published and unpublished, scientific literature concerning the benefits and harms of school-based interventions, which were directed at students 18 years of age or younger to prevent or eliminate such stigmatization. Forty relevant studies were identified, yet only a qualitative synthesis was deemed appropriate. Five limitations within the evidence base constituted barriers to drawing conclusive inferences about the effectiveness and harms of school-based interventions: poor reporting quality, a dearth of randomized controlled trial evidence, poor methods quality for all research designs, considerable clinical heterogeneity, and inconsistent or null results. Nevertheless, certain suggestive evidence derived both from within and beyond our evidence base has allowed us to recommend the development, implementation and evaluation of a curriculum, which fosters the development of empathy and, in turn, an orientation toward social inclusion and inclusiveness. These effects may be achieved largely by bringing especially but not exclusively the youngest children into direct, structured contact with an infant, and likely only the oldest children and youth into direct contact with individuals experiencing mental health difficulties. The possible value of using educational activities, materials and contents to enhance hypothesized benefits accruing to direct contact also requires investigation. Overall, the curriculum might serve as primary prevention for some students and as secondary prevention for others