Guidelines for Cognitive Behavioral Training within Doctoral Psychology Programs in the United States: Report of the Inter-Organizational Task Force on Cognitive and Behavioral Psychology Doctoral Education

The Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies initiated an interorganizational task force to develop guidelines for integrated education and training in cognitive and behavioral psychology at the doctoral level in the United States. Fifteen task force members representing 16 professional associations participated in a yearlong series of conferences, and developed a consensus on optimal doctoral education and training in cognitive and behavioral psychology. The recommendations assume solid foundational training that is typical within applied psychology areas such as clinical and counseling psychology programs located in the United States. This article details the background, assumptions, and resulting recommendations specific to doctoral education and training in cognitive and behavioral psychology, including competencies expected in the areas of ethics, research, and practice.</p

The Factorial Structure of the Schedule for the Deficit Syndrome in Schizophrenia

Deficit schizophrenia (DS) is considered a distinct subtype within the diagnosis of schizophrenia. While the common assumption is that DS represents a single, cohesive domain of psychopathology, the factorial structure of DS has not been investigated. We assessed 52 individuals with DSM-IV diagnoses of schizophrenia with DS. A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted on the symptoms of the Schedule for the Deficit Syndrome. The PCA resulted in 2 distinct factors explaining 73.8% of the variance. Factor 1 (avolition) is made up of symptoms of curbing of interests, diminished sense of purpose, and diminished social drive. Factor 2 (emotional expression) is made up of symptoms of restricted affect, diminished emotional range, and poverty of speech. The results indicate that DS is best characterized by these 2 factors. The great majority of participants (86%) displayed DS symptoms from both factors. On average, participants had 4.19 (S.D. = 1.39) symptoms that were primary, enduring, and at least moderate in severity. The mean severity of symptoms was 2.25 (S.D. = 1.06). We discuss possible links between the obtained factors and putative neurobiological mechanisms, as well as directions for future research