249 research outputs found
THE PROBLEM OF INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN LEARNING PROCESS STUDIES
Introduction. The process of convergence and integration of scientific disciplines involves research in the field of education. Polydisciplinary studies wherein the knowledge is integrated from various scientific disciplines, do not meet the requirements of the solution of complex didactic problems, such as organization of the educational process in the information and educational environment, the construction of education for sustainable development of society, education in modern geopolitical conditions, etc. Thus, the importance of interdisciplinary research with a single subject matter, complementarity of research methods, integrated theoretical grounds and results, will make the contribution to all those scientific fields that are involved in assigned task solution.The aim of the article is to present intermediate results on identification and characteristic features of interdisciplinary studies in the field of education.Methodology and research methods. General scientific theoretical methods of research were used: analysis, comparison, fact-finding, generalization.Results and scientific novelty. An attempt to differentiate the concepts of interdisciplinarity, polydisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity is made. In spite of the fact that these issues are actively discussed in the field of philosophy, there are no precise and unambiguous definitions of these terms; though, there is a research framework, the author of the article makes reference to. The features of an interdisciplinary study are formulated.The functions of didactics as a scientific field are specified. Updating of interdisciplinary studies in education, need of formation of their specific methodologies and expansion of the research field of didactics by means of other interdisciplinary studies and scientific directions are proved. Psycho-didactic and cognitivedidactic studies are considered. Cognitive didactics at the moment does not seem to claim the status of independent scientific discipline as predicted by revealed criteria of interdisciplinarity. It should, however, be noted that in future didactics and cognitive science will combine research efforts on the basis of understanding of common problems and will carry out an ontologization of new scientific reality β cognitive didactics. Realization of this strategic prospect will require not only integration of intellectual resources, but also attraction of organizational and administrative ones, as well as creation of scientific collaborations (associations).The received intermediate results demonstrate updating of cross-disciplinary researches in training, expansion of the research field of didactics at the expense of cross-disciplinary areas of scientific knowledge.Practical significance. Possibilities and scopes for implementation of interdisciplinary studies in the field of didactics, designing of methodologies will allow the experts to deal with current problems of the organization and implementation of education, therefore, to resolve the problems that can not be solved in monoand multidisciplinary studies
THE PROBLEM OF INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN LEARNING PROCESS STUDIES
Introduction. The process of convergence and integration of scientific disciplines involves research in the field of education. Polydisciplinary studies wherein the knowledge is integrated from various scientific disciplines, do not meet the requirements of the solution of complex didactic problems, such as organization of the educational process in the information and educational environment, the construction of education for sustainable development of society, education in modern geopolitical conditions, etc. Thus, the importance of interdisciplinary research with a single subject matter, complementarity of research methods, integrated theoretical grounds and results, will make the contribution to all those scientific fields that are involved in assigned task solution. The aim of the article is to present intermediate results on identification and characteristic features of interdisciplinary studies in the field of education. Methodology and research methods. General scientific theoretical methods of research were used: analysis, comparison, fact-finding, generalization. Results and scientific novelty. An attempt to differentiate the concepts of interdisciplinarity, polydisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity is made. In spite of the fact that these issues are actively discussed in the field of philosophy, there are no precise and unambiguous definitions of these terms; though, there is a research framework, the author of the article makes reference to. The features of an interdisciplinary study are formulated.The functions of didactics as a scientific field are specified. Updating of interdisciplinary studies in education, need of formation of their specific methodologies and expansion of the research field of didactics by means of other interdisciplinary studies and scientific directions are proved. Psycho-didactic and cognitivedidactic studies are considered. Cognitive didactics at the moment does not seem to claim the status of independent scientific discipline as predicted by revealed criteria of interdisciplinarity. It should, however, be noted that in future didactics and cognitive science will combine research efforts on the basis of understanding of common problems and will carry out an ontologization of new scientific reality β cognitive didactics. Realization of this strategic prospect will require not only integration of intellectual resources, but also attraction of organizational and administrative ones, as well as creation of scientific collaborations (associations). The received intermediate results demonstrate updating of cross-disciplinary researches in training, expansion of the research field of didactics at the expense of cross-disciplinary areas of scientific knowledge. Practical significance. Possibilities and scopes for implementation of interdisciplinary studies in the field of didactics, designing of methodologies will allow the experts to deal with current problems of the organization and implementation of education, therefore, to resolve the problems that can not be solved in monoand multidisciplinary studies.Β ΠΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Ρ ΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½. ΠΡΠΎΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ, ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ-ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅, ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ² Π² ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π² ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΈ Π΄Ρ., Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ Π½ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎ-, Π½ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π² ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΉ. ΠΠ΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ, Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ·Π±ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ Π²ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΈ, ΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π°Π» Π±ΡΠ» Π·Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ β ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΎΠ³ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ: Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·, ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎ-ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠ°Π·Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΡΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ° Π½Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ, Ρ
ΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡ, Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ. Π‘ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π£ΡΠΎΡΠ½Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΈ. ΠΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΠΏΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π·Π° ΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΡΠΊ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
Β Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ-Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΈΠ· Π²ΡΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ΅Π² ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π½Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ Π½Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Ρ. ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΡΡΠΎ Π² Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡ ΠΎΠ½ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ β ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΡ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°- Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ², Π²ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΡ Π΄ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π°-Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ (ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ). ΠΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΠ±ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΠΏΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡΠ°ΠΌ, Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ Ρ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ, ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎ- ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ
.
ΠΠΠΠΠΠ§ΠΠ ΠΠ€ΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠΠ‘Π’Π¬ Π€ΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ Π’ΠΠ ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ Π ΠΠΠ Π£Π¨ΠΠΠΠ―Π₯ Π ΠΠ’ΠΠ£ Π‘ΠΠ Π¦Π― Π£ ΠΠΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠ₯ ΠΠ ΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠΠΠ§ΠΠΠ Π‘ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠ
ΠΠ° Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΒ ΡΠΈΡΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΠΈΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡ Ρ 15β18 % Π²Π°Π³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΡ Π² 40β46 % Π²ΠΈΠΏΠ°Π΄ΠΊΡΠ² Π΄ΡΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½Ρ Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΌΡΡ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΒ Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΊΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡ Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π·Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΡΡ Ρ Π²Π°Π³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ· ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΒ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ° Π½Π°Π΄ΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ Π΅ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡ. ΠΠ»Ρ Π΄ΡΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π·Π°Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ, Π·Π°ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΠΠΠΠ΄Π»Ρ Π²Π°Π³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΆΡΠ½ΠΎΠΊ, ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΠΠΒ Π·Π° Π₯ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ. ΠΠΈΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΠΎ Π½Π°Π΄ΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° Π΅ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΡ ΡΒ Π²Π°Π³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ· ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ Π½Π° ΡΠ»ΡΒ Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡ ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΡ
Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΡ
Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ»ΡΡ
ΡΠ² ΡΠ° ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρ.Β ΠΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΌΡ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ²ΠΈ Π·Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠ·ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π²Π°Π³ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ° Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΡΡ ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈ Π·Π·Π°ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΊΠΎΡ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΈΡΠΊΡ ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ΄Π°. ΠΠ°ΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΡΡ Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ·ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠΉΒ ΡΠΈΡΠΌ Ρ Π²Π°Π³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈ Π°Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΌΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΒ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌ Π·Π°ΡΠΎΠ±Π°ΠΌ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΆ Π²ΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ·Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡΒ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ² Π·Π°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΡΡ, Π·Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡΒ Ρ Π²Π°Π³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π· ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈ ΠΉ Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΒ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ°Π·ΡΡ
Post-Pandemic Education: Falling or Preparing for a Jump?
Abstract. Relevance. The article provides an overview and analysis of the consequences of changes in the global educational space during the period of action of measures to counter the spread of the new COVID-19 coronavirus infection.The aim of the work was to understand the current state and identify possible trajectories of developmentof educational systems in the βpost-pandemicβ era. Research methodology and methods. The main methods used in the preparation of the work were methods of analysis and synthesis. The review and understanding of various standpoints on the educational organizations functioning in the situation of emergency introduction of quarantine measures and the uncertainty of their consequences allowed us to summarize the main challenges facing the education system today. The forecasting method was used to systematize the capabilities of universities in overcoming crisis phenomena and determine the strengths that can be used as the basis for the transformation of University management.Results. The analysis of the trajectories of the prospective organization of the educational process at the University of βpost-pandemicβ time is carried out. The article highlights the main ways of the educational system adaptation to work in the conditions of an unpredictable crisis consequences and presents the authorsβ vision of the future of higher education in Russia, which is inextricably linked with the countryβs attractiveness in the global educational space.Scientific novelty. The authors systematize the impact of the pandemic on various sectors of the economy, including the education sector. The results of the analysis of the practical experience of educational systems in Β the new conditions are presented. Scenarios of educational organizations development in an unfavorable dynamic uncertain environment are shown.Practical significance. The results obtained will be useful in adjusting University management systems and developing strategies for universities to overcome the crisis caused by COVID-19 and its consequences
SCREENING OF RICE ACCESSIONS FOR GREENBUG RESISTANCE
During recent years the harmfulness of greenbug for rice crops has significantly increased. Laboratory experiments were conducted to study insect resistance of 200 accessions from the collection of the Donskoy Agrarian Scientific Center. The overwhelming majority of the studied forms were heterogeneous in their resistance. Twelve forms (5.5%) with the resistance score 2.2-3.0 were identified. The accessions NSH-1 (Hungary), βMusa Karemβ (Iran) and Zlatyi Ρ
Strelets (Russia) do not contain susceptible components and can be recommended as sources of aphid resistance for breeding rice varieties
Chronic Methamphetamine Administration Causes Differential Regulation of Transcription Factors in the Rat Midbrain
Methamphetamine (METH) is an addictive and neurotoxic psychostimulant widely abused in the USA and throughout the world. When administered in large doses, METH can cause depletion of striatal dopamine terminals, with preservation of midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Because alterations in the expression of transcription factors that regulate the development of dopaminergic neurons might be involved in protecting these neurons after toxic insults, we tested the possibility that their expression might be affected by toxic doses of METH in the adult brain. Male Sprague-Dawley rats pretreated with saline or increasing doses of METH were challenged with toxic doses of the drug and euthanized two weeks later. Animals that received toxic METH challenges showed decreases in dopamine levels and reductions in tyrosine hydroxylase protein concentration in the striatum. METH pretreatment protected against loss of striatal dopamine and tyrosine hydroxylase. In contrast, METH challenges caused decreases in dopamine transporters in both saline- and METH-pretreated animals. Interestingly, METH challenges elicited increases in dopamine transporter mRNA levels in the midbrain in the presence but not in the absence of METH pretreatment. Moreover, toxic METH doses caused decreases in the expression of the dopamine developmental factors, Shh, Lmx1b, and Nurr1, but not in the levels of Otx2 and Pitx3, in saline-pretreated rats. METH pretreatment followed by METH challenges also decreased Nurr1 but increased Otx2 and Pitx3 expression in the midbrain. These findings suggest that, in adult animals, toxic doses of METH can differentially influence the expression of transcription factors involved in the developmental regulation of dopamine neurons. The combined increases in Otx2 and Pitx3 expression after METH preconditioning might represent, in part, some of the mechanisms that served to protect against METH-induced striatal dopamine depletion observed after METH preconditioning
Visual Laterality of CalfβMother Interactions in Wild Whales
Behavioral laterality is known for a variety of vertebrate and invertebrate animals. Laterality in social interactions has been described for a wide range of species including humans. Although evidence and theoretical predictions indicate that in social species the degree of population level laterality is greater than in solitary ones, the origin of these unilateral biases is not fully understood. It is especially poorly studied in the wild animals. Little is known about the role, which laterality in social interactions plays in natural populations. A number of brain characteristics make cetaceans most suitable for investigation of lateralization in social contacts.) in the greatest breeding aggregation in the White Sea. Here we show that young calves (in 29 individually identified and in over a hundred of individually not recognized mother-calf pairs) swim and rest significantly longer on a mother's right side. Further observations along with the data from other cetaceans indicate that found laterality is a result of the calves' preference to observe their mothers with the left eye, i.e., to analyze the information on a socially significant object in the right brain hemisphere.Data from our and previous work on cetacean laterality suggest that basic brain lateralizations are expressed in the same way in cetaceans and other vertebrates. While the information on social partners and novel objects is analyzed in the right brain hemisphere, the control of feeding behavior is performed by the left brain hemisphere. Continuous unilateral visual contacts of calves to mothers with the left eye may influence social development of the young by activation of the contralateral (right) brain hemisphere, indicating a possible mechanism on how behavioral lateralization may influence species life and welfare. This hypothesis is supported by evidence from other vertebrates
Methamphetamine-Induced Dopamine-Independent Alterations in Striatal Gene Expression in the 6-Hydroxydopamine Hemiparkinsonian Rats
Unilateral injections of 6-hydroxydopamine into the medial forebrain bundle are used extensively as a model of Parkinson's disease. The present experiments sought to identify genes that were affected in the dopamine (DA)βdenervated striatum after 6-hydroxydopamine-induced destruction of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway in the rat. We also examined whether a single injection of methamphetamine (METH) (2.5 mg/kg) known to cause changes in gene expression in the normally DA-innervated striatum could still influence striatal gene expression in the absence of DA. Unilateral injections of 6-hydroxydopamine into the medial forebrain bundle resulted in METH-induced rotational behaviors ipsilateral to the lesioned side and total striatal DA depletion on the lesioned side. This injection also caused decrease in striatal serotonin (5-HT) and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) levels. DA depletion was associated with increases in 5-HIAA/5-HT ratios that were potentiated by the METH injection. Microarray analyses revealed changes (Β± 1.7-fold, p<0.025) in the expression of 67 genes on the lesioned side in comparison to the intact side of the saline-treated hemiparkinsonian animals. These include follistatin, neuromedin U, and tachykinin 2 which were up-regulated. METH administration caused increases in the expression of c-fos, Egr1, and Nor-1 on the intact side. On the DA-depleted side, METH administration also increased the expression of 61 genes including Pdgf-d and Cox-2. There were METH-induced changes in 16 genes that were common in the DA-innervated and DA-depleted sides. These include c-fos and Nor-1 which show greater changes on the normal DA side. Thus, the present study documents, for the first time, that METH mediated DA-independent changes in the levels of transcripts of several genes in the DA-denervated striatum. Our results also implicate 5-HT as a potential player in these METH-induced alterations in gene expression because the METH injection also caused significant increases in 5-HIAA/5-HT ratios on the DA-depleted side
Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΠΠ§-ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ (ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ)
The literature review highlights modern ideas about the pathogenesis, pathomorphology, and clinical manifestations of central nervous system damage in patients with HIV infection, and also touches on the problems of diagnosis and treatment of these opportunistic infections. Particular attention should be paid to patients with severe immunodeficiency (CD4+T-lymphocyte count < 200 cl/ml) due to the high risk of secondary diseases of the central nervous system. Along with the etiological verification of opportunistic diseases of the central nervous system, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain is important at the initial stage of diagnosis, with the help of which it is possible to identify changes in the brain substance characteristic of certain pathogens. In addition to the basic etiotropic therapy of opportunistic infections in HIV patients, effective antiretroviral therapy and its index of penetration into the central nervous system play a crucial role.Π ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡΠ΅ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π΅, ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΠΠ§-ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠΏΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ. ΠΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌ Ρ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΌ (ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ CD4+Π’-Π»ΠΈΠΌΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² β€ 200 ΠΊΠ»/ΠΌΠΊΠ») Π² ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ. ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ΄Ρ Ρ ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π²Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π΅Ρ ΠΌΠ°Π³Π½ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΎΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π°, Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΡ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ·Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π°. ΠΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΌΠΎ Π±Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΈΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ, Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΠΠ§-ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π΅Π΅ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΡΠ²Π½ΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ
Deficit of circulating stem β progenitor cells in opiate addiction: a pilot study
A substantial literature describes the capacity of all addictive drugs to slow cell growth and potentiate apoptosis. Flow cytometry was used as a means to compare two lineages of circulating progenitor cells in addicted patients. Buprenorphine treated opiate addicts were compared with medical patients. Peripheral venous blood CD34+ CD45+ double positive cells were counted as haemopoietic stem cells (HSC's), and CD34+ KDR+ (VEGFR2+) cells were taken as endothelial progenitor cells (EPC's). 10 opiate dependent patients with substance use disorder (SUD) and 11 non-addicted (N-SUD) were studied. The ages were (mean + S.D.) 36.2 + 8.6 and 56.4 + 18.6 respectively (P <0.01). HSC's were not different in the SUD (2.38 + 1.09 Vs. 3.40 + 4.56 cells/mcl). EPC's were however significantly lower in the SUD (0.09 + 0.14 Vs. 0.26 + 0.20 cells/mcl; No. > 0.15, OR = 0.09, 95% C.I. 0.01β0.97), a finding of some interest given the substantially older age of the N-SUD group. These laboratory data are thus consistent with clinical data suggesting accelerated ageing in addicted humans and implicate the important stem cell pool in both addiction toxicology and ageing. They carry important policy implications for understanding the fundamental toxicology of addiction, and suggest that the toxicity both of addiction itself and of indefinite agonist maintenance therapies may have been seriously underestimated
- β¦