Lonidamine significantly increases the activity of epirubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer: results from a multicenter prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Some evidence in vitro and in vivo shows that lonidamine (LND) can positively modulate the activity of doxorubicin and epirubicin (EPI). On this basis, a multicenter prospective randomized trial was performed in patients with advanced breast cancer (BC) to determine if the addition of LND to EPI could increase the response rate of EPI alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May 1991 to May 1993, 207 patients were enrolled onto this study and randomized to receive intravenous (IV) EPI (60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2) alone or with LND (600 mg orally daily). EPI administration was repeated every 21 days until tumor progression or for a maximum of eight cycles. LND was administered continuously until chemotherapy withdrawal. RESULTS: Response rate was significantly superior for the EPI plus LND scheme compared with the single-agent EPI either considering assessable patients (60.0% v 39.8%; P < .01) or including all registered patients according to an intention-to-treat analysis (55.3% v 37.5%; P < .02). The distribution of the response rate according to the site of disease did not show any significant difference between the treatment arms, except for the patient subgroup with liver metastases in which the combination EPI plus LND resulted in a significant improvement of responses than EPI alone. Toxicity was moderate, and except for myalgia, no adjunctive side effects were observed in the EPI plus LND arm. Overall survival and time to progression were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study confirms in vivo that the administration of EPI is enhanced by the concomitant LND administration

Prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer patients obtaining objective response or disease stabilization after first-line chemotherapy with epirubicin. Evidence for a positive effect of maintenance hormonal therapy on overall survival.

Randomized trials suggest that the outcome of metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients is not affected by the currently available therapies. Although response rates per se may be associated with survival prolongation, patients experiencing objective response may be those patients fated to have the longest natural disease history. The separation of responders from progressing patients after first-line chemotherapy could allow the selection of a more homogeneous subgroup in which further treatment strategies might achieve a better control of the disease. This study investigated the influence of some patient characteristics, disease characteristics, and previous treatments on the outcome of non progressing patients after first-line chemotherapy with epirubicin administration. We also evaluated the effect of the maintenance endocrine therapy in improving response rate and overall survival (OS). From May 91 to May 93, 207 patients were enrolled in a randomized trial aiming to compare the activity of epirubicin (120 mg/sqm) +/- lonidamine (600 mg/daily). Among the 169 patients attaining complete (CR), partial response (PR) or disease stabilization (SD), 65 were not randomly submitted to maintenance endocrine therapy (MET). Liver involvement, previous adjuvant chemotherapy and previous hormonal therapy (administered in adjuvant setting or for advanced disease) were found to negatively influence OS both in univariate and multivariate analysis. Differences in OS stratifying patients according to DFI, estrogen receptor status and PS did not attain statistical significance. Patients receiving MET survived significantly longer than those submitted to observation and this difference maintained the statistical significance also within patient subsets homogeneous for specific prognostic features. In conclusion, most prognostic factors for advanced BC have been confirmed in our series of patients obtaining CR, PR or SD to full dose epirubicin. The positive prognostic impact of MET is impressive and deserves confirmation in randomized studies

Conventional versus cytokinetic polychemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment in metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized cooperative trial

Diethylstilbestrol (DES) can induce a recruitment into the proliferative pool of previously resting breast cancer cells in vivo. In order to verify if estrogenic recruitment could result in a larger tumor cell killing by chemotherapy, 117 patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive CEF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2; epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2; and 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2 on day 1); DES-CEF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 on day 1; DES, 1 mg orally on days 5, 6, and 7; and epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2, on day 8) every 21 days. No significant difference in objective response rates, survival, or progression-free survival was seen between the two regimens. Patients in the DES-CEF arm experienced a higher complete response (CR) rate (24.1% v 16.1%), which reached statistical significance in the case of soft-tissue metastasis (48% v 27.3%; P less than .05) and estrogen receptor-negative tumors (35.7% v 11.1%; P less than .025). Survival and progression-free survival of patients refractory to treatment were not worsened by estrogenic recruitment. In the subset of patients failing after adjuvant polychemotherapy, DES-CEF unexpectedly induced a significantly longer survival (greater than 802 days v 375 days; P = .029) and progression-free survival (239 days v 192 days; P = .041) than CEF. The DES-CEF regimen was more myelotoxic, and 43.3% of the DES-CEF cycles had to be delayed because of leukopenia in comparison with 11.8% of the CEF cycles (P less than .0001). In conclusion, chemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment was able to induce more CRs in certain subsets of patients and a significant prolongation in survival and progression-free survival of patients failing after adjuvant polychemotherapy. These results have been achieved despite a significantly lower dose intensity of chemotherap