54 research outputs found

    NATO’s Defense Policy Dilemma in the Baltic States

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this paper is to discuss the dilemma NATO has faced since February 2014 in its defence policy regarding the Baltic States. If NATO pursues a policy of deterrence, it might trigger war because Russia, the would-be deteree, may perceive actions taken by NATO as not intended to strengthen deterrence but rather to intimidate or coerce it. If it pursues an alternate policy of leaving the Baltic States visibly undefended, it might trigger war because Russia may see this as a sign of weakness and a gap to be exploited. This article investigates the logic of the dilemma, before considering whether NATO’s choice, made at the Warsaw Summit of July 2016, is working as intended. Ultimately, we cannot predict the answer and, therefore, we should consider all possible outcomes, including those which lead to a defensive war in the Baltic States.History and International Relation

    Colin S. Gray, Deterrence, and Contingency

    Get PDF
    History and International Relation

    The strategic response to ambiguity

    Get PDF
    History and International Relation

    La fiabilité des engagements de défense de L’OTAN envers les pays baltes

    Get PDF
    History and International Relation

    Sanctuary, honor, and war termination: considerations for strategy in Baltic defense

    Get PDF
    History and International Relation

    Conceptual resilience versus social utility in strategic thinking

    Get PDF
    History and International Relation

    NATO’s Defense Policy Dilemma in the Baltic States

    No full text
    The purpose of this paper is to discuss the dilemma NATO has faced since February 2014 in its defence policy regarding the Baltic States. If NATO pursues a policy of deterrence, it might trigger war because Russia, the would-be deteree, may perceive actions taken by NATO as not intended to strengthen deterrence but rather to intimidate or coerce it. If it pursues an alternate policy of leaving the Baltic States visibly undefended, it might trigger war because Russia may see this as a sign of weakness and a gap to be exploited. This article investigates the logic of the dilemma, before considering whether NATO’s choice, made at the Warsaw Summit of July 2016, is working as intended. Ultimately, we cannot predict the answer and, therefore, we should consider all possible outcomes, including those which lead to a defensive war in the Baltic States.</p

    The Russian Public and War Termination in the Baltic States

    No full text
    History and International Relation
    • …
    corecore