Pemetrexed disodium in recurrent locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

This phase II study determined response rate of patients with locally advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer treated with pemetrexed disodium, a new multitargeted antifolate that inhibits thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase. 35 patients with local or metastatic relapse of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (31 male, 4 female; median age 53 years) were treated with pemetrexed 500 mg m2 administered as a 10-minute infusion on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Patients received 1 to 8 cycles of therapy. 9 patients (26.5%) had an objective response, with a median response duration of 5.6 months (range 2.9–20 months). 15 (44.1%) had stable disease, and 8 (23.5%) had progressive disease. 2 patients were not assessable for response. Median overall survival was 6.4 months (range 0.7–28.1 months; 95% CI: 3.9–7.7 months). 24 patients (68.6%) experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia, with febrile neutropenia in 4 (11.4%). Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 11 (34.3%) and 6 (17.1%) patients, respectively. The most frequent non-haematological toxicity was grade 3/4 mucositis (17.1%; 6 patients). In conclusion, pemetrexed is active in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Although substantial haematological toxicities were experienced by patients, subsequent studies have shown that these toxicities can be proactively managed by folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.co

Long-duration, weekly treatment with gemcitabine plus vinorelbine for non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

International audienceIn this phase II study, gemcitabine and vinorelbine were combined at suboptimal doses for weekly administration in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objectives were to determine objective response rate (ORR) and time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were safety and overall survival. Chemonaive patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) immediately followed by gemcitabine (800 mg/m2) once each week (on day 1) for 6 months without rest. From May 1998 to May 1999, 40 patients were enrolled (85% males; 70% stage IV) with a median age of 65.5. A total of 478 doses were administered, with a median of 9 per patient (range 2-72). The ORR was 27.5% (95% CI, 15.1-44.1%). The median TTP was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.9-4.4 months). At a median follow-up of 6.5 months, the median survival was 11.6 months, and survival rates at 1 and 2 year(s) were 47.5% and 15.8%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia, in 70% of patients, with febrile neutropenia in 28%. The most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity was transaminase elevation, in 22.5% of patients, which was transient and reversible. The other most prominent toxicities were, unexpectedly, pulmonary and cardiac toxicities. Based on these results, weekly, long-term administration of gemcitabine-vinorelbine appears to be an active regimen in NSCLC that warrants further investigation

Nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet) combination (R-COMP) chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): results from the phase II EURO 18 trial

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the activity and safety of nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet) when substituted for doxorubicin in the R-CHOP regimen (R-COMP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were studied. Only patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >/=50% were allowed. R-COMP regimen was administered every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by additional five cycles in case of complete response (CR) or partial response. RESULTS: From November 2002 to April 2005, 75 patients were registered, of which 72 were evaluated. Median age was 72 years (range 61-83); 56% of patients had high or high-intermediate International Prognostic Index score. Median LVEF at baseline was 61%. Thirty-eight patients had history of abnormal cardiovascular conditions. The overall response rate was 71%, with a CR rate of 57%. After a median follow-up of 33 months, the 3-year overall survival, failure-free survival, and progression-free survival rates were 72%, 39%, and 69%, respectively. Neutropenia (54%) was the most frequent grade 3-4 adverse event (AE); 21% of patients experienced cardiac AEs, graded as 3-4 in 4% of the cases. CONCLUSION: R-COMP is an effective regimen for the treatment of DLBCL in elderly patients, with an acceptable tolerability profile

Nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (MyocetTM) combination (R-COMP) chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): results from the phase II EUR018 trial

Abstract BACKGROUND: To evaluate the activity and safety of nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet) when substituted for doxorubicin in the R-CHOP regimen (R-COMP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were studied. Only patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > or =50% were allowed. R-COMP regimen was administered every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by additional five cycles in case of complete response (CR) or partial response. RESULTS: From November 2002 to April 2005, 75 patients were registered, of which 72 were evaluated. Median age was 72 years (range 61-83); 56% of patients had high or high-intermediate International Prognostic Index score. Median LVEF at baseline was 61%. Thirty-eight patients had history of abnormal cardiovascular conditions. The overall response rate was 71%, with a CR rate of 57%. After a median follow-up of 33 months, the 3-year overall survival, failure-free survival, and progression-free survival rates were 72%, 39%, and 69%, respectively. Neutropenia (54%) was the most frequent grade 3-4 adverse event (AE); 21% of patients experienced cardiac AEs, graded as 3-4 in 4% of the cases. CONCLUSION: R-COMP is an effective regimen for the treatment of DLBCL in elderly patients, with an acceptable tolerability profile

Phase I-II and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the toxicity profile, the recommended dose (RD) and the pharmacokinetic parameters, and to evaluate the antitumor activity of gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ovarian carcinoma (OC). METHODS: Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-min infusion followed by a 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin, repeated every 2 weeks. Doses of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin ranged from 800 to 1500 and 70 to 100 mg/m(2), respectively. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (26 males, 18 females; median age 55 years) including 35 NSCLC (five platinum pretreated) and nine OC patients (all platinum pretreated) received a total of 355 cycles. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. No dose-limiting toxicity at any dose level occurred during the first two cycles; therefore, the highest dose-level of gemcitabine (1500 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) was considered as the RD. Hematological toxicity was moderate amongst the 22 patients treated (167 cycles) at that dose level. Thirteen cycles were associated with grade 3-4 non-febrile neutropenia in six patients, and eight cycles with grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in two patients. Other toxicities were mild to moderate, consisting of asthenia and peripheral neurotoxicity. Four of the 35 patients treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) experienced grade 3 neurotoxicity requiring treatment discontinuation at cycle 10. In the range of the doses used, gemcitabine and its main metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine appeared not to be affected by oxaliplatin 70-100 mg/m(2). Of the 44 patients evaluable for activity, 12 NSCLC patients experienced objective responses (one complete and 11 partial responses) and three OC patients showed tumor stabilization lasting for 6 months with a 50% decrease of CA 125 level. Two partial responses (NSCLC) and one tumor stabilization (OC) occurred in platinum-resistant patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin could be safely administered on an out-patient schedule in patients with advanced NSCLC and OC. The RD was gemcitabine 1500 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks. Promising antitumor activity was reported in patients with NSCLC and platinum-pretreated OC, and thus, deserves further evaluation