A Review of the Design and Implementation of a Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: AN EXPANDING OPPORTUNITY FOR OPTIMIZING CARDIOVASCULAR CARE

PURPOSE: This review describes the considerations for the design and implementation of a hybrid cardiac rehabilitation (HYCR) program, a patient-individualized combination of facility-based cardiac rehabilitation (FBCR) with virtual cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and/or remote CR. REVIEW METHODS: To help meet the goal of the Millions Hearts Initiative to increase CR participation to 70% by 2022, a targeted review of the literature was conducted to identify studies pertinent to the practical design and implementation of an HYCR program. Areas focused upon included the current use of HYCR, exercise programming considerations (eligibility and safety, exercise prescription, and patient monitoring), program assessments and outcomes, patient education, step-by-step instructions for billing and insurance reimbursement, patient and provider engagement strategies, and special considerations. SUMMARY: A FBCR is the first choice for patient participation in CR, as it is supported by an extensive evidence base demonstrating effectiveness in decreasing cardiac and overall mortality, as well as improving functional capacity and quality of life. However, to attain the CR participation rate goal of 70% set by the Million Hearts Initiative, CR programming will need to be expanded beyond the confines of FBCR. In particular, HYCR programs will be necessary to supplement FBCR and will be particularly useful for the many patients with geographic or work-related barriers to participation in an FBCR program. Research is ongoing and needed to develop optimal programming for HYCR

Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis

WOS: 000380066200025PubMed: 27286123Purpose: to investigate whether patients with lichen planus (LP) are really prone to urolithiasis or not. Patients and Methods: We performed a prospective analysis of 40 patients diagnosed with lichen planus (LP) (group I), and 40 volunteers did not have LP before (group II). Participants were all checked for urolithiasis by radiological investigations. Blood samples were analyzed for biochemistry parameters including calcium and uric acid. 24-h urine samples were analyzed to investigate oxalate, citrate calcium, uric acid, magnesium, sodium and creatinine. Results: Men/women ratio and mean age were similar between group I and II (p> 0.05). A presence or history of urolithiasis was detected in 8 (20%) and 2 (% 5) patients in group I and II, respectively (p< 0.05). Hypocitraturia was the most common anomaly with 35% (n: 14) in group I. The rate of hypocitraturia in group II was 12.5% (n: 5) and the difference was statistically significantly different (p= 0.036). In group I, hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria followed with rates of 27.5% (n: 11) and 25% (n: 10), respectively. The rate of hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria were both 5% (n: 2) in group II and the differences were significant (p< 0.05). Hyperuricemia was another important finding in the patients with LP. It was detected in 13 (32.5%) patients in group I and in 1 (2.5%) participant in group II (p= 0.001). Conclusion: According to our results, metabolic disorders of urolithiasis were highly detected in the patients with LP. However, similar to the etiology of LP, the exact reasons for these metabolic abnormalities in LP remain a mystery