Dynamics and diversity of the ‘Atopobium cluster' in the human faecal microbiota, and phenotypic characterization of ‘Atopobium cluster' isolates

This study monitored the dynamics and diversity of the human faecal ‘Atopobium cluster’ over a 3-month period using a polyphasic approach. Fresh faecal samples were collected fortnightly from 13 healthy donors (6 males and 7 females) aged between 26 and 61 years. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to enumerate total (EUB338mix) and ‘Atopobium cluster’ (ATO291) bacteria, with counts ranging between 1.12 1011 and 9.95 1011, and 1.03 109 and 1.16 1011 cells (g dry weight faeces)-1, respectively. The ‘Atopobium cluster’ population represented 0.2–22 % of the total bacteria, with proportions donor-dependent. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) using ‘Atopobium cluster’-specific primers demonstrated faecal populations of these bacteria were relatively stable, with bands identified as Collinsella aerofaciens, Collinsella intestinalis/Collinsella stercoris, Collinsella tanakaei, Coriobacteriaceae sp. PEAV3-3, Eggerthella lenta, Gordonibacter pamelaeae, Olsenella profusa, Olsenella uli and Paraeggerthella hongkongensis in the DGGE profiles of individuals. Colony PCR was used to identify ‘Atopobium cluster’ bacteria isolated from faeces (n = 224 isolates). 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of isolates demonstrated Collinsella aerofaciens represented the predominant (88 % of isolates) member of the ‘Atopobium cluster’ found in human faeces, being found in nine individuals. Eggerthella lenta was identified in three individuals (3.6 % of isolates). Isolates of Collinsella tanakaei, an ‘Enorma’ sp. and representatives of novel species belonging to the ‘Atopobium cluster’ were also identified in the study. Phenotypic characterization of the isolates demonstrated their highly saccharolytic nature and heterogeneous phenotypic profiles, and 97 % of the isolates displayed lipase activity

Rights, Knowledge, and Governance for Improved Health Equity in Urban Settings

All three of the interacting aspects of daily urban life (physical environment, social conditions, and the added pressure of climate change) that affect health inequities are nested within the concept of urban governance, which has the task of understanding and managing the interactions among these different factors so that all three can be improved together and coherently. Governance is defined as: “the process of collective decision making and processes by which decisions are implemented or not implemented”: it is concerned with the distribution, exercise, and consequences of power. Although there appears to be general agreement that the quality of governance is important for development, much less agreement appears to exist on what the concept really implies and how it should be used. Our review of the literature confirmed significant variation in meaning as well as in the practice of urban governance arrangements. The review found that the linkage between governance practices and health equity is under-researched and/or has been neglected. Reconnecting the fields of urban planning, social sciences, and public health are essential “not only for improving local governance, but also for understanding and addressing global political change” for enhanced urban health equity. Social mobilization, empowering governance, and improved knowledge for sustainable and equitable development in urban settings is urgently needed. A set of strategic research questions are suggested

Managing the organic fraction of municipal solid waste

The European Commission (EC) has issued several directives, guidelines and strategies associated with biological wastes that are significantly altering the solid waste management landscape of some member countries in the European Union (EU). The Landfill Directive and the Biowaste Directive as well as the Soil Protection Strategy have had a substantial effect on the quantities and methods of managing organic residues. To comply with these directives, EU Member States focused on several trends including composting, anaerobic digestion and mechanical-biological treatment system

Marketing of Composts

The financial feasibility of a program designed to recover resources from municipal solid wastes is, to a large extent, a function of the availability, reliability, and location of markets for the materials that are recovered. Obtaining markets for compost accomplishes one primary objective: it provides end uses for finished product. In addition, the availability of markets provides an important source of revenue, defrays some of the cost of processing, and contributes to the financial viability of an overall waste management strategy. The latter is an important consideration in reducing the amount of residues that are disposed on the land