Differential biomarker profiles between unprovoked venous thromboembolism and cancer.

The relationship between cancer and venous thromboembolic disease (VTD) are complex because the activated coagulation factors are not only involved in thrombosis but also in malignant processes, such as angiogenesis and metastasis. To compare phenotypes of extracellular vesicles (EVs), and levels of D-dimer, soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) and antigenic tissue factor (TF) between unprovoked VTD patients, who did not develop cancer during one-year follow-up, and those with advanced stage of cancer but not associated with VTD. A prospective study in which we included 138 unprovoked VTD patients and 67 advanced cancer patients, who did not develop thrombosis. Levels of EVs of different cellular origin (platelet, endothelium and leukocyte), EVs positive for tissue factor (TF) and P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 were quantified by flow cytometry. D-dimer, soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) and antigenic TF were determined by ELISA. TF-positive EVs, D-dimer, and sP-selectin were markedly elevated in unprovoked VTD patients compared to cancer patients without association with thrombosis. Levels of TF-positive EVs, D-dimer and sP-selectin are able to discriminate between unprovoked VTD patients not related to cancer and cancer patients not associated with VTD. These results could lead to the application of EVs as biomarkers of both diseases. Key messages: Circulating EVs, specifically TF-positive EVs, in combination with plasmatic markers of hypercoagulable states, such as D-dimer, sP-selectin and antigen TF, are able to discriminate between cancer patients without thrombosis and patients with unprovoked VTD. Research fields could be opened. Future studies will assess if these biomarkers together serve as predicting thrombotic events in cancer populations

A case-control analysis of the impact of venous thromboembolic disease on quality of life of patients with cancer: Quality of life in cancer (Qca) study

Although there is published research on the impact of venous thromboembolism (VTE) on quality of life (QoL), this issue has not been thoroughly investigated in patients with cancer—particularly using specific questionnaires. We aimed to examine the impact of acute symptomatic VTE on QoL of patients with malignancies. This was a multicenter, prospective, case-control study conducted in patients with cancer either with (cases) or without (controls) acute symptomatic VTE. Participants completed the EORTC QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-3L, PEmb-QoL, and VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaires. Statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in terms of global health status were examined. Between 2015 and 2018, we enrolled 425 patients (128 cases and 297 controls; mean age: 60.2 ± 18.4 years). The most common malignancies were gastrointestinal (23.5%) and lung (19.8%) tumors. We found minimally important differences in global health status on the EQ-5D-3L (cases versus controls: 0.55 versus 0.77; mean difference: −0.22) and EORTC QLQ-C30 (47.7 versus 58.4; mean difference: −10.3) questionnaires. There were minimally important differences on the PEmb-QoL questionnaire (44.4 versus 23; mean difference: −21.4) and a significantly worse QoL on the VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire (42.7 versus 51.7; mean difference: −9). In conclusion, we showed that acute symptomatic VTE adversely affects the QoL of patients with malignancies.This project was financially supported by Leo Pharma (6/2013) and Neumosur (9/2014)

Desarrollo de un suero equino hiperinmune para el tratamiento de COVID-19 en Argentina

Fil: Pontoriero, A. ANLIS Dr.C.G.Malbrán. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Departamento de Virología. Servicio de Virosis Respiratorias. Centro Nacional de Influenza PAHO/WHO; Argentina.Fil: Baumeister, Elsa. ANLIS Dr.C.G.Malbrán. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Departamento de Virología. Servicio de Virosis Respiratorias. Centro Nacional de Influenza PAHO/WHO; Argentina.Fil: Campos, Ana. ANLIS Dr.C.G.Malbrán. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Departamento de Virología. Servicio de Virosis Respiratorias. Centro Nacional de Influenza PAHO/WHO; Argentina.Fil: Avaro, Martín. ANLIS Dr.C.G.Malbrán. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Departamento de Virología. Servicio de Virosis Respiratorias. Centro Nacional de Influenza PAHO/WHO; Argentina.Fil: Benedetti, Estefanía. ANLIS Dr.C.G.Malbrán. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Departamento de Virología. Servicio de Virosis Respiratorias. Centro Nacional de Influenza PAHO/WHO; Argentina.Fil: Dattero, María. ANLIS Dr.C.G.Malbrán. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Departamento de Virología. Servicio de Virosis Respiratorias. Centro Nacional de Influenza PAHO/WHO; ArgentinaFil: Zylberman, Vanesa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Sanguineti, Santiago. INMUNOVA S.A.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Higa, Sandra V. Instituto Biológico Argentino S.A.I.C.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Cerutti, María L. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Centro de Rediseño e Ingenieria de Proteínas (CRIP); Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Morrone Seijo, Susana M. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Pardo, Romina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Muñoz, Luciana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Acuña Intrieri, María E. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Centro de Rediseño e Ingenieria de Proteínas (CRIP); Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Alzogaray, Vanina A. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires (IIBA). Fundación Instituto Leloir. Laboratorio de Inmunología y Microbiología Molecular; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Berguer, Paula M. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires (IIBA). Fundación Instituto Leloir. Laboratorio de Inmunología y Microbiología Molecular; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Bocanera, Laura. mAbxience; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Bukata, Lucas. INMUNOVA S.A.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Bustelo, Marina S. INMUNOVA S.A.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Colonna, Mariana. INMUNOVA S.A.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Correa, Elisa. mAbxience; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Cragnaz, Lucía. mAbxience; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Dellafiore, María. mAbxience; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Foscaldi, Sabrina. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires (IIBA). Fundación Instituto Leloir. Laboratorio de Inmunología y Microbiología Molecular; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: González, Joaquín V. INMUNOVA S.A.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Guerra, Luciano L. mAbxience; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Klinke, Sebastián. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires (IIBA). Fundación Instituto Leloir. Laboratorio de Inmunología y Microbiología Molecular; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Labanda, María S. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires (IIBA). Fundación Instituto Leloir. Laboratorio de Inmunología y Microbiología Molecular; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Lauché, Constanza. INMUNOVA S.A.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: López, Juan C. Instituto Biológico Argentino S.A.I.C.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Martínez, Anabela M. Instituto Biológico Argentino S.A.I.C.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Otero, Lisandro H. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires (IIBA). Fundación Instituto Leloir. Laboratorio de Inmunología y Microbiología Molecular; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Peyric, Elías H. Instituto Biológico Argentino S.A.I.C.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Ponziani, Pablo F. Instituto Biológico Argentino S.A.I.C.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Ramondino, Romina. INMUNOVA S.A.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Rinaldi, Jimena. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires (IIBA). Fundación Instituto Leloir. Laboratorio de Inmunología y Microbiología Molecular; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Rodríguez, Santiago. mAbxience; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Russo, Javier E. Instituto Biológico Argentino S.A.I.C.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Russo, Mara L. ANLIS Dr.C.G.Malbrán. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Departamento de Virología. Servicio de Virosis Respiratorias. Centro Nacional de Influenza PAHO/WHO; Argentina.Fil: Saavedra, Soledad L. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires (IIBA). Fundación Instituto Leloir. Laboratorio de Inmunología y Microbiología Molecular; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Seigelchifer, Mauricio. mAbxience; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Sosa, Santiago. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires (IIBA). Fundación Instituto Leloir. Laboratorio de Inmunología y Microbiología Molecular; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Vilariño, Claudio. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Centro de Rediseño e Ingenieria de Proteínas (CRIP); Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: López Biscayart, Patricia. Instituto Biológico Argentino S.A.I.C.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Corley, Esteban. mAbxience; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Spatz, Linus. INMUNOVA S.A.; Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Goldbaum, Fernando A. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires (IIBA). Fundación Instituto Leloir. Laboratorio de Inmunología y Microbiología Molecular; Buenos Aires, Argentina.The disease named COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, is currently generating a global pandemic. Vaccine development is no doubt the best long-term immunological approach, but in the current epidemiologic and health emergency there is a need for rapid and effective solutions. Convalescent plasma is the only antibody-based therapy available for COVID-19 patients to date. Equine polyclonal antibodies (EpAbs) put forward a sound alternative. The new generation of processed and purified EpAbs containing highly purified F(ab')2 fragments demonstrated to be safe and well tolerated. EpAbs are easy to manufacture allowing a fast development and scaling up for a treatment. Based on these ideas, we present a new therapeutic product obtained after immunization of horses with the receptor-binding domain of the viral Spike glycoprotein. Our product shows around 50 times more potency in in vitro seroneutralization assays than the average of convalescent plasma. This result may allow us to test the safety and efficacy of this product in a phase 2/3 clinical trial to be conducted in July 2020 in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Platelet count and outcome in patients with acute venous thromboembolism.

The relationship between platelet count and outcome in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been consistently explored. RIETE is an ongoing registry of consecutive patients with acute VTE. We categorised patients as having very low- (<80,000/µl), low- (80,000/µl to 150,000/µl), normal- (150,000/µl to 300,000/µl), high- (300,000/µl to 450,000/µl), or very high (>450,000/µl) platelet count at baseline, and compared their three-month outcome. As of October 2012, 43,078 patients had been enrolled in RIETE: 21,319 presenting with pulmonary embolism and 21,759 with deep-vein thrombosis. In all, 502 patients (1.2%) had very low-; 5,472 (13%) low-; 28,386 (66%) normal-; 7,157 (17%) high-; and 1,561 (3.6%) very high platelet count. During the three-month study period, the recurrence rate was: 2.8%, 2.2%, 1.8%, 2.1% and 2.2%, respectively; the rate of major bleeding: 5.8%, 2.6%, 1.7%, 2.3% and 4.6%, respectively; the rate of fatal bleeding: 2.0%, 0.9%, 0.3%, 0.5% and 1.2%, respectively; and the mortality rate: 29%, 11%, 6.5%, 8.8% and 14%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, patients with very low-, low-, high- or very high platelet count had an increased risk for major bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 2.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.85-3.95; 1.43 [1.18-1.72]; 1.23 [1.03-1.47]; and 2.13 [1.65-2.75]) and fatal bleeding (OR: 3.70 [1.92-7.16], 2.10 [1.48-2.97], 1.29 [0.88-1.90] and 2.49 [1.49-4.15]) compared with those with normal count. In conclusion, we found a U-shaped relationship between platelet count and the three-month rate of major bleeding and fatal bleeding in patients with VTE

International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortiu (INICC) report, data summary of 43 countries for 2007-2012. Device-associated module

We report the results of an International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) surveillance study from January 2007-December 2012 in 503 intensive care units (ICUs) in Latin America, Asia, Africa, and Europe. During the 6-year study using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) U.S. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions for device-associated health care–associated infection (DA-HAI), we collected prospective data from 605,310 patients hospitalized in the INICC's ICUs for an aggregate of 3,338,396 days. Although device utilization in the INICC's ICUs was similar to that reported from ICUs in the U.S. in the CDC's NHSN, rates of device-associated nosocomial infection were higher in the ICUs of the INICC hospitals: the pooled rate of central line–associated bloodstream infection in the INICC's ICUs, 4.9 per 1,000 central line days, is nearly 5-fold higher than the 0.9 per 1,000 central line days reported from comparable U.S. ICUs. The overall rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia was also higher (16.8 vs 1.1 per 1,000 ventilator days) as was the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (5.5 vs 1.3 per 1,000 catheter days). Frequencies of resistance of Pseudomonas isolates to amikacin (42.8% vs 10%) and imipenem (42.4% vs 26.1%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates to ceftazidime (71.2% vs 28.8%) and imipenem (19.6% vs 12.8%) were also higher in the INICC's ICUs compared with the ICUs of the CDC's NHSN