Corrections to: Use of the BOADICEA Web Application in clinical practice: appraisals by clinicians from various countries.

The article "Use of the BOADICEA Web Application in clinical practice: appraisals by clinicians from various countries" written by Anne Brédart · Jean‑Luc Kop · Antonis C. Antoniou · Alex P. Cunningham · Antoine De Pauw ·Marc Tischkowitz · Hans Ehrencrona · Sylvie Dolbeault · Léonore Robieux · Kerstin Rhiem ·Douglas F. Easton · Peter Devilee · Dominique Stoppa‑Lyonnet· Rita Schmutlzer, was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on 16th June 2017 without open access

Understanding students’ motivations for participating in a mindfulness course: a qualitative analysis of medical students’ views

Abstract Objectives Improving medical students’ wellbeing and empowerment through curricular activities is a topic of interest worldwide. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are increasingly implemented in medical education often as part of elective courses. To better understand training outcomes and adjust curriculum to students’ needs, we will explore why will medical students participate in meditation-based education? Methods We analyzed 29 transcripts from the first session of an 8-week MBSR program offered to medical students in French. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using a qualitative content thematic analysis and the constant comparison method. Results Analyses resulted in three themes describing students’ motivation: (1) Medical education and the physician’s role, i.e. improving interpersonal skills, acquiring skills oriented toward a more integrative medicine, being more productive in a highly competitive context. (2) Caring for my health i.e. aiming at stress reduction, emotion regulation, and improving self-compassion. (3) A quest for meaning, i.e. optimizing meaning of care, and meaning of life. Conclusion The results highlight the congruence between the perceived motivations and the evidence on the effect of mindfulness on self-care, the development of humanistic medical skills, and the meaning of care. Some findings raise the issue of the limits of using mindfulness to enhance one’s productivity. Notably, participants articulated the need for self-care as in mindfulness training, with the ability to care for others

Is the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy measuring two or five dimensions? Evidence in a French sample

International audienceAlthough many instruments measure empathy, most of them focus on specific facets (e.g., Spreng et al., 2009) or specific contexts (e.g. Wang et al., 2003) of empathy. For this reason, the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE; Reniers et al., 2011) was recently built to grasp the general construct of empathy through its Affective-Cognitive duality, although not providing clear-cut results about the bidimensionality of the scale. In this study, Confirmatory Factor Analyses were conducted on the responses of 418 adults on the French QCAE (backtranslated for this study). A total of 8 models were tested – including the models of the original investigation. The 5-correlated factors model had the best fit, and the pattern of correlations between the factors did not support the Cognitive-Affective distinction. The QCAE is discussed as showing signs of psychometrical robustness, but also as a tool that is more 5-dimensional than bidimensional

Use of the BOADICEA breast cancer risk prediction tool in clinical practice: Appraisals across clinicians from various countries

International audienc

Corrections to: Use of the BOADICEA Web Application in clinical practice: appraisals by clinicians from various countries.

The article "Use of the BOADICEA Web Application in clinical practice: appraisals by clinicians from various countries" written by Anne Brédart · Jean‑Luc Kop · Antonis C. Antoniou · Alex P. Cunningham · Antoine De Pauw ·Marc Tischkowitz · Hans Ehrencrona · Sylvie Dolbeault · Léonore Robieux · Kerstin Rhiem ·Douglas F. Easton · Peter Devilee · Dominique Stoppa‑Lyonnet· Rita Schmutlzer, was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on 16th June 2017 without open access