9 research outputs found
Comparing Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection With Conservative Treatment in Improving Quality of Life of Patients With Diverticulitis The Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection Following Diverticulitis (LASER) Randomized Clinical Trial
IMPORTANCE Diverticulitis has a tendency to recur and affect quality of life. OBJECTIVE To assess whether sigmoid resection is superior to conservative treatment in improving quality of life of patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This open-label randomized clinical trial assessed for eligibility 128 patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis in 6 Finnish hospitals from September 29, 2014, to October 10, 2018. Exclusion criteria included age younger than 18 years or older than 75 years; lack of (virtual) colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy data within 2 years, or presence of cancer, contraindication to laparoscopy, or fistula. Outcomes were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis. A prespecified interim analysis was undertaken when 66 patients had been randomized and their 6-month follow-up was assessable. Data were analyzed from June 2018 to May 2020. INTERVENTIONS Laparoscopic sigmoid resection or conservative treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was difference in Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) score between randomization and 6 months. RESULTS Of 128 patients assessed for eligibility, 90 were randomized (28 male [31%]; mean [SD] age, 54.11 [11.9] years; 62 female [69%]; mean [SD] age, 57.13 [7.6] years). A total of 72 patients were included in analyses for the primary outcome (37 in the surgery group and 35 in the conservative treatment group), and 85 were included in analyses for clinical outcomes (41 in the surgery group and 44 in the conservative treatment group). The difference between GIQLI score at randomization and 6 months was a mean of 11.96 points higher in the surgery group than in the conservative treatment group (mean [SD] of 11.76 [15.89] points vs -0.2 [19.07] points; difference, 11.96; 95% CI, 3.72-20.19; P = .005). Four patients (10%) in the surgery group and no patients in the conservative treatment group experienced major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher). There were 2 patients (5%) in the surgery group and 12 patients (31%) in the conservative treatment group who had new episodes of diverticulitis within 6 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection improved quality of life in patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis but carried a 10% risk of major complications.Peer reviewe
Impact of DNA ligase IV on nonhomologous end joining pathways during class switch recombination in human cells
Class switch recombination (CSR) is a region-specific, transcriptionally regulated, nonhomologous recombinational process that is initiated by activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID). The initial lesions in the switch (S) regions are subsequently processed and resolved, leading to recombination of the two targeted S regions. The mechanisms by which repair and ligation of the broken DNA ends occurs is still elusive. Recently, a small number of patients lacking DNA ligase IV, a critical component of the nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) machinery, have been identified. We show that these patients display a considerably increased donor/acceptor homology at Sμ–Sα junctions compared with healthy controls. In contrast, Sμ–Sγ junctions show an increased frequency of insertions but no increase in junctional homology. These altered patterns of junctional resolution may be related to differences in the homology between the Sμ and the downstream isotype S regions, and could reflect different modes of switch junction resolution when NHEJ is impaired. These findings link DNA ligase IV, and thus NHEJ, to CSR
Functional analysis of ATM with relevance for primary immunodeficiency and tumor formation
Ataxia-telangiectasia is a rare autosomal recessive disorder
characterized by cerebellar degeneration with ataxia, ocular and
cutaneous telangiectasias, radiosensitivity, chromosomal instability,
immunodeficiency, and cancer predisposition in both patients and
heterozygous carriers of the gene. The gene responsible for the disorder,
ATM, has been identified as a member of a family of phosphatidylinositol
3-kinaserelated genes and is one of the master controllers of the
networks that are involved in cell cycle control and response to DNA
damage.
In an attempt to investigate the functions of ATM, we have first
identified the Swedish patients with the disorder and studied the Nordic
A-T families for mutations in the ATM gene. We have also studied the role
of ATM mutations in the pathogenesis of B-cell chronic lymphocytic
leukemia and found that ATM inactivation is not a common or essential
event in the pathogenesis of the vast majority of patients.
The immunopathogenic mechanism linking ATM dysfunction and
immunodeficiency has not yet been established. The fact that the
mechanisms involved in maintaining the genome stability are also utilized
during lymphocyte development to create immune diversity, lead us to
study class switch recombination in patients with ataxia-telangiectasia
and related disorders Nijmegen breakage syndrome, ataxiatelangiectasia
like disorder and Seckel syndrome, with mutations in NBS1, MRE11 and ATR,
respectively.
We performed a detailed analysis of breakpoints resulting from in vivo
switching from µ to alpha in the patients to study the nonhomologous end
joining during class switch recombination. The switch junctions in all
patient groups showed a trend toward increased microhomology usage. We
also found that ATM and ATR are likely to act in the same pathway, but
during different phases of the process, and both are involved in
generation of mutations at or close to the junctions, and the upstream Sµ
region. In addition, the absence of NBS1 or MRE11, that together with
RAD50 form the Mre11 complex, clearly reduces switching in patients.
These findings suggest that ATM, ATR and the Mre 11 complex are involved
in nonhomologous end joining during class switch recombination and are
likely to have both common and independent roles in the process
Quality-of-Life and Recurrence Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection vs Conservative Treatment Following Diverticulitis Prespecified 2-Year Analysis of the LASER Randomized Clinical Trial
IMPORTANCE Both elective sigmoid resection and conservative treatment are options for patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis; understanding outcomes following each can help inform decision-making.OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes of elective sigmoid resection and conservative treatment for patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis at 2-year follow-up.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter parallel open-label individually randomized clinical trial comparing elective sigmoid resection to conservative treatment in patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis was carried out in 5 Finnish hospitals between September 2014 and October 2018. Follow-up up to 2 years is reported. Of 85 patients randomized and included, 75 and 70 were available for QOL outcomes at 1 year and 2 years, respectively, and 79 and 78 were available for the recurrence outcome at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. The present analysis was conducted from September 2015 to June 2022.INTERVENTIONS Laparoscopic elective sigmoid resection vs conservative treatment (patient education and fiber supplementation).MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Prespecified secondary outcomes included Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) score, complications, and recurrences within 2 years.RESULTS Ninety patients (28 male [31%]; mean [SD] age, 54.11 [11.9] years and 62 female [69%]; mean [SD] age, 57.13 [7.6] years) were randomized either to elective sigmoid resection or conservative treatment. After exclusions, 41 patients in the surgery group and 44 in the conservative group were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Eight patients (18%) in the conservative treatment group underwent sigmoid resection within 2 years. The mean GIQLI score at 1 year was 9.51 points higher in the surgery group compared to the conservative group (mean [SD], 118.54 [17.95] vs 109.03 [19.32]; 95% CI, 0.83-18.18; P = .03), while the mean GIQLI score at 2 years was similar between the groups. Within 2 years, 25 of 41 patients in the conservative group (61%) had recurrent diverticulitis compared to 4 of 37 patients in the surgery group (11%). Four of 41 patients in the surgery group (10%) and 2 of 44 in the conservative group (5%) had major postoperative complications within 2 years. In per-protocol analyses, the mean (SD) GIQLI score was higher in the surgery group compared to the conservative treatment group by 11.27 points at 12 months (119.42 [17.98] vs 108.15 [19.28]; 95% CI, 2.24-20.29; P = .02) and 10.43 points at 24 months (117.24 [15.51] vs 106.82 [18.94]; 95% CI, 1.52-19.33; P = .02).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, elective sigmoid resection was effective in preventing recurrent diverticulitis and improved quality of life over conservative treatment within 2 years.Peer reviewe
Comparing laparoscopic elective sigmoid resection with conservative treatment in improving quality of life of patients with diverticulitis:the Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection Following Diverticulitis (LASER) randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Importance: Diverticulitis has a tendency to recur and affect quality of life.
Objective: To assess whether sigmoid resection is superior to conservative treatment in improving quality of life of patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis.
Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial assessed for eligibility 128 patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis in 6 Finnish hospitals from September 29, 2014, to October 10, 2018. Exclusion criteria included age younger than 18 years or older than 75 years; lack of (virtual) colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy data within 2 years, or presence of cancer, contraindication to laparoscopy, or fistula. Outcomes were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis. A prespecified interim analysis was undertaken when 66 patients had been randomized and their 6-month follow-up was assessable. Data were analyzed from June 2018 to May 2020.
Interventions: Laparoscopic sigmoid resection or conservative treatment.
Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was difference in Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) score between randomization and 6 months.
Results: Of 128 patients assessed for eligibility, 90 were randomized (28 male [31%]; mean [SD] age, 54.11 [11.9] years; 62 female [69%]; mean [SD] age, 57.13 [7.6] years). A total of 72 patients were included in analyses for the primary outcome (37 in the surgery group and 35 in the conservative treatment group), and 85 were included in analyses for clinical outcomes (41 in the surgery group and 44 in the conservative treatment group). The difference between GIQLI score at randomization and 6 months was a mean of 11.96 points higher in the surgery group than in the conservative treatment group (mean [SD] of 11.76 [15.89] points vs −0.2 [19.07] points; difference, 11.96; 95% CI, 3.72–20.19; P = .005). Four patients (10%) in the surgery group and no patients in the conservative treatment group experienced major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher). There were 2 patients (5%) in the surgery group and 12 patients (31%) in the conservative treatment group who had new episodes of diverticulitis within 6 months.
Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection improved quality of life in patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis but carried a 10% risk of major complications.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02174926
Quality-of-life and recurrence outcomes following laparoscopic elective sigmoid resection vs conservative treatment following diverticulitis:prespecified 2-year analysis of the LASER randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Importance: Both elective sigmoid resection and conservative treatment are options for patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis; understanding outcomes following each can help inform decision-making.
Objective: To compare outcomes of elective sigmoid resection and conservative treatment for patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis at 2-year follow-up.
Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter parallel open-label individually randomized clinical trial comparing elective sigmoid resection to conservative treatment in patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis was carried out in 5 Finnish hospitals between September 2014 and October 2018. Follow-up up to 2 years is reported. Of 85 patients randomized and included, 75 and 70 were available for QOL outcomes at 1 year and 2 years, respectively, and 79 and 78 were available for the recurrence outcome at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. The present analysis was conducted from September 2015 to June 2022.
Interventions: Laparoscopic elective sigmoid resection vs conservative treatment (patient education and fiber supplementation).
Main Outcomes and Measures: Prespecified secondary outcomes included Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) score, complications, and recurrences within 2 years.
Results: Ninety patients (28 male [31%]; mean [SD] age, 54.11 [11.9] years and 62 female [69%]; mean [SD] age, 57.13 [7.6] years) were randomized either to elective sigmoid resection or conservative treatment. After exclusions, 41 patients in the surgery group and 44 in the conservative group were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Eight patients (18%) in the conservative treatment group underwent sigmoid resection within 2 years. The mean GIQLI score at 1 year was 9.51 points higher in the surgery group compared to the conservative group (mean [SD], 118.54 [17.95] vs 109.03 [19.32]; 95% CI, 0.83-18.18; P = .03), while the mean GIQLI score at 2 years was similar between the groups. Within 2 years, 25 of 41 patients in the conservative group (61%) had recurrent diverticulitis compared to 4 of 37 patients in the surgery group (11%). Four of 41 patients in the surgery group (10%) and 2 of 44 in the conservative group (5%) had major postoperative complications within 2 years. In per-protocol analyses, the mean (SD) GIQLI score was higher in the surgery group compared to the conservative treatment group by 11.27 points at 12 months (119.42 [17.98] vs 108.15 [19.28]; 95% CI, 2.24-20.29; P = .02) and 10.43 points at 24 months (117.24 [15.51] vs 106.82 [18.94]; 95% CI, 1.52-19.33; P = .02).
Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, elective sigmoid resection was effective in preventing recurrent diverticulitis and improved quality of life over conservative treatment within 2 years.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0217492