The "Spacemaker", a New Device for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery: An Evaluation and Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate a new inflatable lung retractor, the "Spacemaker", and its efficacy in facilitating minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery without the need of one lung ventilation or carbon dioxide overpressure insufflation. METHODS: The device was tested in 12 anesthetized pigs (90-100 kg) placed on standard endotracheal ventilation. The device was introduced into the right or left side of the chest, depending on the intended procedure to be performed, via a 3-cm incision in the fifth intercostal space. A total of seven animals were used to evaluate hemodynamic and respiratory response to the device, whereas another five animals were used to assess the feasibility of a variety of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgical procedures. RESULTS: Introduction was easy and unhindered. The device was inflated up to 0.6 bar, thereby pushing the lung tissue gently away cranially, posteriorly, and caudally without interfering with pulmonary function or resulting in respiratory compromise. In addition, hemodynamics remained stable throughout the experiments. Different closed-chest surgical procedures such as left atrial appendage exclusion, pulmonary vein exposure, pacemaker lead placement, and endoscopic stabilization for coronary surgery, were successfully performed. Removal was quick and complete in all cases, and lung tissue showed no remnant atelectasis. CONCLUSIONS: The "Spacemaker" may represent a reliable alternative to current conventional techniques to facilitate minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery. Further research is warranted to confirm the effectiveness and the safety of this device and to optimize the model before its use in humans and its introduction into clinical practice

Contact forces during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: an in vitro evaluation

PURPOSE: Data on epicardial contact force efficacy in dual epicardial–endocardial atrial fibrillation ablation procedures are lacking. We present an in vitro study on the importance of epicardial and endocardial contact forces during this procedure. METHODS: The in vitro setup consists of two separate chambers, mimicking the endocardial and epicardial sides of the heart. A circuit, including a pump and a heat exchanger, circulates porcine blood through the endocardial chamber. A septum, with a cut out, allows the placement of a magnetically fixed tissue holder, securing porcine atrial tissue, in the middle of both chambers. Two trocars provide access to the epicardium and endocardium. Force transducers mounted on both catheter holders allow real-time contact force monitoring, while a railing system allows controlled contact force adjustment. We histologically assessed different combinations of epi-endocardial radiofrequency ablation contact forces using porcine atria, evaluating the ablation’s diameters, area, and volume. RESULTS: An epicardial ablation with forces of 100 or 300 g, followed by an endocardial ablation with a force of 20 g did not achieve transmurality. Increasing endocardial forces to 30 and 40 g combined with an epicardial force ranging from 100 to 300 and 500 g led to transmurality with significant increases in lesion’s diameters, area, and volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Increased endocardial contact forces led to larger ablation lesions regardless of standard epicardial pressure forces. In order to gain transmurality in a model of a combined epicardial–endocardial procedure, a minimal endocardial force of 30 g combined with an epicardial force of 100 g is necessary