SYNOVIAL FLUID AND SERUM ANTIBODIES AGAINST CHLAMYDIA IN DIFFERENT FORMS OF ARTHRITIS: INTRA-ARTICULAR IgA PRODUCTION IN CHLAMYDIA SEXUALLY ACQUIRED REACTIVE ARTHRITIS

SUMMARY Since the presence of Chlamydia has been shown in synovial fluid (SF) from some patients with Chlamydia reactive arthritis, we investigated whether anti-Chlamydia antibodies present in the joint are derived from the circulation or are locally produced. We compared titres of IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies against Chlamydia, and against a control antigen (tetanus toxoid), by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), in paired samples of serum and SF from Chlamydia trachomatis sexually acquired reactive arthritis (CT-SARA) patients and from patients with other forms of arthritis. The ratio of serum/SF IgA anti-Chlamydia antibodies was significantly decreased in CT-SARA patients. It is concluded that, in our experimental conditions, we found evidence for intra-articular production of IgA anti-Chlamydia antibodie

THE VALUE OF ISOTYPE DETERMINATION OF SERUM ANTIBODIES AGAINST CHLAMYDIA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CHLAMYDIA REACTIVE ARTHRITIS

SUMMARY In clinical rheumatology, the diagnosis of Chlamydia reactive arthritis is difficult because an incomplete form of the disease can closely resemble an undifferentiated seronegative mono/oligoarthritis. We investigated whether measuring specific isotypes of anti-Chlamydia antibodies in serum can improve the diagnosis, by comparing such antibody concentrations in the serum of patients with well-defined disease, i.e. Chlamydia trachomatis sexually acquired reactive arthritis (CT-SARA), with other arthritides. Antibody levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). When considering two different isotypes and their combination, the best sensitivity (63%) was obtained for IgM and/or IgA results with a specificity of 81%. The patients with CT-SARA and SARA had the highest levels of antibodies of all isotypes tested. It is concluded that, in our experimental conditions, only very high values of specific isotypes could indicate a diagnosis of Chlamydia reactive arthriti

Psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in Norway : nationwide prevalence and use of biologic agents

Objective To estimate the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the use of biologic agents in these diseases in Norway. Methods From the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), we identified as PsA, axSpA and RA patients >= 18 years those with >= 2 recorded episodes with diagnostic coding for index disease (L40.5, M07.0-M07.3 for PsA; M45, M46.0, M46.1, M46.8 and M46.9 for axSpA; M05-M06 for RA). We calculated the point prevalence of PsA, axSpA and RA as per the 1(st) of January 2017 in the Norwegian adult population (age >= 18). Dispensed disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) prescriptions were obtained from the Norwegian Prescription Database and biologic DMARDs given in hospitals from the NPR. Results The point prevalence of PsA, axSpA, RA, and any of these diseases in total was 0.46%, 0.41%, 0.78%, and 1.56%, respectively. Among women, the prevalence of PsA, axSpA, and RA was 0.50%, 0.37%, and 1.10%, and among men 0.43%, 0.45%, and 0.46%, respectively. In 2017, 27.3% of RA patients, 25.7% of PsA patients and 35.1% of axSpA patients used biologic DMARDs. Treatment with biologics was more frequent in younger age groups in all three diseases, and became more infrequent especially after age >= 55 years. Conclusion In Norway, the combined prevalence of PsA, axSpA, and RA was over 1.5%. Reflecting the good overall access to highly effective but costly biologic treatments, more than a fourth of these patients used biologic agents, which corresponds to over 0.4% of Norwegian adult population.Peer reviewe

Smoking and response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis : results from an international European collaboration

Objectives: To investigate whether smoking habits predict response to rituximab (RTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Method: We included patients from the CERERRA international cohort receiving the first treatment cycle with available smoking status (n = 2481, smokers n = 528, non-current smokers n = 1953) and at least one follow-up visit. Outcome measures were change in Disease Activity Score based on 28-joint count (Delta DAS28) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response at 6 months, with non-current smokers as the referent group. Results: Compared with non-smokers at baseline, smokers were more often rheumatoid factor (RF)/anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positive and males, had shorter disease duration, lower DAS28 and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score, a higher number of prior biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, and were more likely to receive concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARDs). Disease activity had decreased less in smokers at 6 months (Delta DAS28 = 1.5 vs 1.7, p = 0.006), although the difference was no longer significant after correction for baseline DAS28 (p = 0.41). EULAR good response rates did not differ between smokers and non-smokers overall or stratified by RF/ACPA status, although smokers had lower good response rates among seronegative patients (ACPA-negative: 6% vs 14%, RF-negative: 11% vs 18%). Smoking did not predict good response [odds ratio (OR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.76-1.41], while ACPA, DAS28, HAQ, and concomitant csDMARDs were significant predictors for good response. However, when stratified by country, smokers were less likely to achieve good response in Sweden (unadjusted OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.07-0.89), and a trend was seen in the Czech Republic (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.16-1.02). Conclusion: In this large, observational, multinational RA cohort, smokers starting RTX differed from non-smokers by having shorter disease duration and lower disease activity, but more previous treatments. The overall results do not support smoking as an important predictor for response to RTX in patients with RA.Peer reviewe

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a global perspective on the use of antirheumatic drugs

Modern therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is based on knowledge of the severity of the natural history of the disease. RA patients are approached with early and aggressive treatment strategies, methotrexate as an anchor drug, biological targeted therapies in those with inadequate response to methotrexate, and “tight control,” aiming for remission and low disease activity according to quantitative monitoring. This chapter presents a rationale for current treatment strategies for RA with antirheumatic drugs, a review of published reports concerning treatments in clinical cohorts outside of clinical trials, and current treatments at 61 sites in 21 countries in the QUEST-RA database