How Cervical Reconstruction Surgery Affects Global Spinal Alignment.

BACKGROUND:There have been no reports describing how cervical reconstruction surgery affects global spinal alignment (GSA). OBJECTIVE:To elucidate the effects of cervical reconstruction for GSA through a retrospective multicenter study. METHODS:Seventy-eight patients who underwent cervical reconstruction surgery for cervical kyphosis were divided into a Head-balanced group (n = 42) and a Trunk-balanced group (n = 36) according to the values of the C7 plumb line (PL). We also divided the patients into a cervical sagittal balanced group (CSB group, n = 18) and a cervical sagittal imbalanced group (CSI group, n = 60) based on the C2 PL-C7 PL distance. Various sagittal Cobb angles and the sagittal vertical axes were measured before and after surgery. RESULTS:Cervical alignment was improved to achieve occiput-trunk concordance (the distance between the center of gravity [COG] PL, which is considered the virtual gravity line of the entire body, and C7 PL < 30 mm) despite the location of COG PL and C7PL. A subsequent significant change in thoracolumbar alignment was observed in Head-balanced and CSI groups. However, no such significant change was observed in Trunk-balanced and CSB groups. We observed 1 case of transient and 1 case of residual neurological worsening. CONCLUSION:The primary goal of cervical reconstruction surgery is to achieve occiput-trunk concordance. Once it is achieved, subsequent thoracolumbar alignment changes occur as needed to harmonize GSA. Cervical reconstruction can restore both cervical deformity and GSA. However, surgeons must consider the risks and benefits in such challenging cases

Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion

OBJECT: The authors introduce a unique computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw (CPS) insertion technique used in conjunction with specially modified original pedicle screw insertion instruments. The accuracy of screw placement as well as surgery-related outcome and complication rates were compared between two groups of patients: those in whom a computer-assisted and those in whom a conventional manual insertion technique was used. METHODS: The screw insertion guiding system consisted of a modified awl, probe, tap and a screwdriver specially designed for a computer-assisted CPS insertion. Using this system, real-time instrument/screw tip information was three dimensionally identified in each step of screw insertion. Seventeen patients underwent CPS fixation in which a computer-assisted surgical navigation system was used. The cervical disorders consisted of spondylotic myelopathy with segmental instability or kyphosis, metastatic spinal tumor, rheumatoid spine, and postlaminectomy kyphosis. The rate of pedicle wall perforation was significantly lower in the computer-assisted group than that in the other group (1.2 and 6.7%, respectively; p 0.05). The screw trajectory in the horizontal plane was significantly closer to the anatomical pedicle axis in the computer-assisted group compared with the manual insertion group (p 0.05). This factor significantly reduced the incidence of screw perforation laterally. Complications such as neural damage or vascular injury were not demonstrated in the computer-assisted group (compared with 2% in the manual insertion treatment group). The overall surgery-related outcome was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the previously reported computer-assisted technique, our CPS insertion technique provides real-time three-dimensional instrument/screw tip information. This serves as a powerful tool for safe and accurate pedicle screw placement in the cervical spine

Cervical spine injuries associated with lateral mass and facet joint fractures: new classification and surgical treatment with pedicle screw fixation

To clarify the injury pattern, initial spinal instability, degree of discoligamentous injuries in cervical lateral mass and facet joint fractures, we retrospectively analyzed radiological parameters and introduced a new classification for these injuries. Surgical treatment was performed with cervical pedicle screw fixation (CPS), and overall neurological and radiological outcome was evaluated with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Lateral mass fractures were divided into the following four subtypes: separation, comminution, split, and traumatic spondylolysis. The sagittal and frontal alignments were evaluated at both mainly injured and adjacent spinal segments on radiographs. The initial discoligamentous injuries were investigated on magnetic resonance imaging in terms of their frequencies, subtype of injuries, and involved spinal levels. Anterior translation of fractured vertebra was demonstrated in 77% of lateral mass fractures, while 24% of anterior translation was observed, even in cephalad-adjacent vertebrae. On magnetic resonance imaging, signal changes in anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) and intervertebral disc were demonstrated in 76% of caudal segments and 24% of cephalad segments adjacent to fractured vertebra of lateral mass fractures. The subtype analyses of lateral mass fractures demonstrated high rates of anterior translation in separation, split, and traumatic spondylolisthesis, as well as significant coronal malalignment in comminution and split types (p<0.05). Thirty-one patients underwent surgical treatments using a cervical pedicle screw fixation. The CPS provided the superior capability of deformity correction without pseudoarthrosis, as well as excellent neurological recovery. The average numbers of stabilized segments were minimized without serious complications. In separation, facet joint fracture, and fractures with mild lateral mass comminution, the single level posterior fixation can be considered. The significant unstable injuries of split and comminution type with coronal malalignment can be treated with exclusive two-level posterior stabilization with CPS. The initial evaluation of fracture subtypes helps to successfully minimize the stabilized spinal segmen

Subaxial Sagittal Alignment After Atlantoaxial Fixation Techniques

Study Design: A retrospective clinical case series. Objectives: To evaluate the association between C1-C2 fixation angle and postoperative C2-C7 alignment in the sagittal plane after C1 lateral mass screw with C2 pedicle screw fixation (C1-LMS) or Magerl with wiring technique. Summary of Background Data: Various techniques for posterior correction and fusion, such as the Magerl procedure with posterior wiring and C1-LMS procedures, are used for treating atlantoaxial instability. However, only few studies investigating the relationship between postoperative C1-C2 angle and C2-C7 sagittal alignment change after C1-C2 fixation have been reported. Methods: We retrospectively followed up 42 patients who underwent the C1-LMS (22 patients) or Magerl with wiring procedure (20 patients) to treat C1-C2 instability for > 2 years. The atlantodental interval, space available for the spinal cord, and O-C1, C1-C2, C2-C3, and C2-C7 angles were measured. Results: Significant reduction in atlantodental interval and increase in space available for the spinal cord were observed in both groups. Although the preoperative C1-C2 angles were similar, the angle at the final follow-up was higher in the Magerl with wiring group than in the C1-LMS group (P < 0.01). The C1-C2 fixation and postoperative C2-C7 angles were negatively correlated in both groups (C1-LMS group, r = -0.55, P < 0.01; Magerl with wiring, r = -0.62, P < 0.01). Conclusions: Increased lordotic change in the C1-C2 angle was associated with increased kyphotic changes in the C2-C7 angle after both procedures. The C1-LMS procedure effectively controlled C1-C2 sagittal alignment during surgery. To decrease the risk of postoperative subaxial kyphotic changes, the C1-C2 fixation angle should be carefully determined

Effects of Porosity Changes in Hydroxyapatite Ceramics Vertebral Spacer on Its Binding Capability to the Vertebral Body : An Experimental Sheep Study

OBJECT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of bone ingrowth and bonding stiffness at the surface of hydroxyapatite ceramic (HAC) spacers with different porosities in an animal model and to discuss the ideal porous characteristics of these spacers for anterior spinal reconstruction. METHODS. Twenty-one adult sheep (age 1–2 years, mean weight 70 kg) were used in this experiment. Surgery consisted of anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L2–3 and L4–5, insertion of an HAC spacer (10 * 13 * 24 mm) with three different porosities (0, 3, and 15%), and single-rod anterior instrumentation. At 4 and 6 months postoperatively, the lumbar spines were harvested. Bonding conditions at the bone–HAC spacer interface were evaluated using neuroimages and biomechanically. A histological evaluation was also conducted to examine the state of bone ingrowth at the surface of the HAC spacer. Biomechanical testing showed that the bonding strength of HAC at 6 months postoperatively was 0.047 MPa in 0% porosity spacers, 0.39 MPa in 3%, and 0.49 MPa in 15% porosity spacers. The histological study showed that there was a soft-tissue layer at the surface of the HAC spacer with 0% porosity. Direct bonding was observed between bone and spacers with 3 or 15% porosity. Micro–computed tomography scans showed direct bonding between the bone and HAC with 3 or 15% porosity. No direct bonding was observed in HAC with 0% porosity. CONCLUSIONS. Dense (0%) HAC anterior vertebral spacers did not achieve direct bonding to the bone in the sheep model. The HAC vertebral spacers with 3 or 15% porosity showed proof of direct bonding to the bone at 6 months postoperatively. The higher porosity HAC spacer showed better bonding stiffness to the bone

Biomechanical study on the effect of five different lumbar reconstruction techniques on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and lamina strain.

OBJECT: The objectives of this study were to compare the biomechanical effects of five lumbar reconstruction models on the adjacent segment and to analyze the effects of three factors: construct stiffness, sagittal alignment, and the number of fused segments. METHODS: Nondestructive flexion-extension tests were performed by applying pure moments to 10 calf spinal (L3-S1) specimens. One-segment (L5-6) or two-segment (L5-S1) posterior fusion methods were simulated: 1) one-segment posterolateral fusion (PLF); 2) one-segment PLF with interbody fusion cages (one-segment PLIF/PLF); 3) two-segment PLF; 4) two-segment PLIF/PLF; and 5) two-segment PLF in kyphosis (two-segment kyphotic PLF). The range of motion (ROM) of the reconstructed segments, intradiscal pressure (IDP), and lamina strain in the upper (L4-5) adjacent segment were analyzed. The ROM was significantly decreased in the PLIF/PLF models compared with that in the PLF alone models after both the one- and two-segment fusions. If the number of fused segments was increased, the pressure and strains were also increased in specimens subjected to the PLIF/PLF procedure, more so than the PLF-alone procedure. In the one-segment PLIF/PLF model the authors observed a reduced IDP and lamina strain compared with those in the kyphotic two-segment PLF model despite the latter's higher levels of initial stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: If the number of fused levels can be reduced by using PLIF to correct local kyphosis, then this procedure may be valuable for reducing adjacent-segment degenerative changes