21 research outputs found

    The troubling transformation of the EU

    Get PDF
    Several leading European politicians, including French President Emmanuel Macron, have recently spoken on the need to pursue an ambitious EU reform agenda. Hans Kundnani writes that the EU has already undergone a substantial transformation over the last decade, but that the trajectory of these changes should give cause for concern. He identifies the shift toward a more 'German Europe', the the EU adopting an increasingly coercive system of rules and enforcement for its members, and a rigid focus on ‘competitiveness’ by EU leaders as particularly troubling developments

    Enough of the hegemony: why Germany really wants the UK to stay in the EU

    Get PDF
    A European Union without Britain would make Germany even more dominant – but that is not necessarily what Angela Merkel wants, as Hans Kundnani explains. Other member states already resent German hegemony and the pressure on the Chancellor to solve the migrant crisis would only increase

    The return of the German question: why conflict between creditor and debtor states is now the defining feature of European politics

    Get PDF
    One of the key geopolitical issues in Europe prior to the Second World War was how the power of Germany could be effectively balanced by other European states. Hans Kundnani assesses the relevance of these historical debates to the current situation within Europe in the aftermath of the Eurozone crisis. He argues that while Germany is no longer a threat from a military perspective, its economic power has put intolerable pressures on other members of the Eurozone, generating instability in much the same way as its previous military power once did. This instability is now centred around the standoff between creditor and debtor countries, underlined by the victory of Syriza in the Greek parliamentary elections, and potential future electoral success for parties such as Podemos in Spain

    Europe's strategic dilemmas

    Get PDF
    O lento progresso no domĂ­nio da cooperação militar reflete um problema mais profundo: a ausĂȘncia de uma cultura estratĂ©gica europeia partilhada. Paralelamente, a presença de constrangimentos em matĂ©ria de recursos imprime Ă  Europa uma maior urgĂȘncia para cooperar. Na Ășltima dĂ©cada, o ambiente no qual a Europa opera mudou radicalmente – mudança esta que a Europa nĂŁo conseguiu acompanhar. A evolução dos acontecimentos veio comprometer os pressupostos nos quais a EstratĂ©gia Europeia de Segurança, acordada em 2003, se baseou. Os europeus carecem de uma nova estratĂ©gia global, necessitando de fazer escolhas sobre o nĂ­vel a que pretendem influenciar e como. Uma ilustração da tendĂȘncia europeia para evitar realizar escolhas complexas reside no conceito de “parcerias estratĂ©gicas” – o quadro europeu de referĂȘncia conceptual de relacionamento com potĂȘncias lĂ­deres no sĂ©culo XXI. Se algo resta da aspiração da UE para se afirmar como “potĂȘncia normativa” este conceito deve refletir uma distinção de polĂ­tica externa entre democracias e nĂŁo-democracias

    Den EuropĂŠiske union under forandring

    Get PDF
    Valget til Europa-Parlamentet stÄr for dÞren. Her med en tale afholdt af Hans Kundnani som er research director ved European Council. Talen blev afholdt 31. marts 2014 pÄ en EU-koference i KÞbenhavn.&nbsp

    Between a rock and a hard place? Navigating domestic and international expectations on German foreign policy

    Get PDF
    This article takes stock of German foreign policy during Angela Merkel's third term in office (2013–17). It argues that the longer-term significance of Germany's foreign policy during this period is twofold. First, the Merkel government was confronted with multiple European and international crises which worked as a magnifying glass for the growing international expectations on Germany to become more actively engaged on the international stage. Second, the tenure of the Grand Coalition saw a significant shift in the German domestic foreign policy discourse that was marked by a concerted effort of leading decision-makers to make the case for Germany to accept greater international responsibilities. This emerging consensus among foreign policy elites expresses a changed self-conception of German foreign policy which, however, continues to be viewed with scepticism in the broader public. Informed by such a broad two-level perspective that focuses on the interplay between international and domestic expectations on German foreign policy, the article explores the record of the Grand Coalition in the main international crises it had to engage with. It suggests that the Merkel government was better able to live up to its own aspirations in two-level contexts which left it with greater domestic room for manoeuvre

    Welche Macht darf es denn Sein? Tracing ‘Power’ in German Foreign Policy Discourse

    Get PDF
    The relationship between ‘Germany’ and ‘power’ remains a sensitive issue. While observers tend to agree that Germany has regained the status of the most powerful country in Europe, there is debate whether that is to be welcomed or whether that is a problem. Underpinning this debate are views, both within Germany and amongst its neighbours, regarding the kind of power Germany has, or should (not) have. Against this backdrop, the article reviews the dominant role conceptions used in the expert discourse on German foreign policy since the Cold War that depict Germany as a particular type of ‘power’. Specifically, we sketch the evolution of three prominent conceptions (constrained power, civilian power, hegemonic power) and the recent emergence of a new one (shaping power). The article discusses how these labels have emerged to give meaning to Germany’s position in international relations, points to their normative and political function, and to the limited ability of such role images to tell us much about how Germany actually exercises power

    Why Germany matters for Japan

    No full text

    New U.K.-US Alignment can Reshape Transatlantic Cooperation

    No full text
    The UK has put aside its desire for a US trade deal as the two unite around an agenda of shared values and common global purpose seemingly not shared by the EU
    corecore