The PrEscription of intraDialytic exercise to improve quAlity of Life in patients with chronic kidney disease trial:study design and baseline data for a multicentre randomized controlled trial

Background: Exercise interventions designed to improve physical function and reduce sedentary behaviour in haemodialysis (HD) patients might improve exercise capacity, reduce fatigue and lead to improved quality of life (QOL). The PEDAL study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a 6-month intradialytic exercise programme on quality of life (QOL) and physical function, compared to usual care for patients on HD in the UK.Methods: We conducted a prospective, pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) in 335 HD patients and randomly (1:1) assigned them to either, i) intradialytic exercise training plus usual care maintenance HD, or ii) usual care maintenance HD. The primary outcome of the study was the change in Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL-SF 1.3) Physical Component Score between baseline and 6 months. Additional secondary outcomes included changes in: peak aerobic capacity, physical fitness, habitual physical activity levels and falls (International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Duke’s Activity Status Index and Tinetti Falls Efficacy Scale), quality of life and symptom burden assessments (EQ5D), arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity), anthropometric measures, resting blood pressure, clinical chemistry, safety and harms associated with the intervention, hospitalisations, and cost-effectiveness. A nested qualitative study investigated the experience and acceptability of the intervention for both participants and members of the renal healthcare team.Results: At baseline assessment, 62.4% of the randomised cohort were male, the median age was 59.3 years, and 50.4% were White. Prior cerebrovascular events and myocardial infarction (MI) were present in 8 and 12% of the cohort, respectively, 77.9% of patients had 3hypertension and 39.4% had diabetes. Baseline clinical characteristic and laboratory data for the randomised cohort were generally concordant with data from the UK Renal Registry.Conclusion: The results from this study will address a significant knowledge gap in the prescription of exercise interventions for patients receiving maintenance HD therapy and inform the development of intradialytic exercise programmes both nationally and internationally.Trial Registration: ISRCTN N83508514; registered on 17th December 2014.</p

Randomized Trial-PrEscription of intraDialytic exercise to improve quAlity of Life in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis

Introduction: Whether clinically implementable exercise interventions in people receiving hemodialysis (HD) therapy improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains unknown. The PrEscription of intraDialytic exercise to improve quAlity of Life PEDAL) study evaluated the clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of a 6-month intradialytic exercise program. Methods: In a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial, people receiving HD were randomly assigned to (i) intradialytic exercise training (exercise intervention group [EX]) and (ii) usual care (control group [CON]). Primary outcome was change in Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short-Form Physical Component Summary (KDQOL-SF 1.3 PCS) from baseline to 6 months. Cost-effectiveness was determined using health economic analysis; physiological impairment was evaluated by peak oxygen uptake; and harms were recorded. Results: We randomized 379 participants; 335 and 243 patients (EX  = 127; CON  = 116) completed baseline and 6-month assessments, respectively. Mean difference in change PCS from baseline to 6 months between EX and CON was 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.1 to 4.8) arbitrary units ( = 0.055); no improvements were observed in peak oxygen uptake or secondary outcome measures. Participants in the intervention group had poor compliance (47%) and poor adherence (18%) to the exercise prescription. Cost of delivering intervention ranged from US$598 to US$1092 per participant per year. The number of participants with harms was similar between EX ( = 69) and CON ( = 56). A primary limitation was the lack of an attention CON. Many patients also withdrew from the study or were too unwell to complete all physiological outcome assessments. Conclusions: A 6-month intradialytic aerobic exercise program was not clinically beneficial in improving HRQoL as delivered to this cohort of deconditioned patients on HD

Kliničke praktične smjernice za perioperacijsku i poslijeoperacijsku skrb o arterijsko-venskim fistulama i umetcima za hemodijalizu u odraslih

Krvožilni pristup omogućuje hemodijalizu koja spašava život. Stoga je nužna dobra funkcija krvožilnog pristupa koja omogućuje prikladan krvni protok radi uklanjanja tvari koje se u uremiji zadržavaju u krvi bolesnika, uz istodobno sniženje rizika od sustavne infekcije na najmanju moguću mjeru. Godine 2007. Europske smjernice najbolje prakse (engl. European Best Practice Guidelines – EBPG), prethodnice trenutačne Europske najbolje bubrežne prakse (engl. European Renal Best Practice – ERBP), donijele su nacrt skupine preporuka – vodiča pri donošenju odluka o upućivanju na pregled radi krvožilnog pristupa, o procjeni i nadzoru izbora pristupa te o postupcima kod komplikacija. (1) Otad su se znatno razvili ne samo dokazi na kojima se temelje ove preporuke nego i procesi nastajanja smjernica. (2) Kao odgovor na to, ERBP je ažurirao prethodno djelo u suradnji s raznim stručnjacima iz tog područja uključujući i predstavnike Društva za krvožilni pristup (engl. Vascular Access Society – VAS), kirurge za krvožilni pristup, radiologe, medicinske sestre za dijalizu, znanstvenike, bolesnike i one koji se za njih brinu. Nastojanje da se pridržavaju sve strože metodike izrade smjernica nalagalo je određena odricanja u pogledu područja obuhvata ovih smjernica. Posljedično, one ne „pokrivaju” baš sve iste teme kao njihova prethodna verzija. Neka su područja zajednička, a neka su arhivirana da bi ustupila mjesto novim pitanjima kojima su prednost dali i pružatelji zdravstvene skrbi i oni za koje se skrbi. Odvojeno su objavljene pojedinosti postupka izbora djelokruga problematike koju su smjernice obuhvatile. (3) Nastajanje ovih smjernica slijedilo je strog proces pregleda i procjene dokaza koji se temeljio na sustavnim pregledima rezultata kliničkih istraživanja te opservacijskih podataka gdje je to bilo potrebno. Strukturirani pristup slijedio je model sustava GRADE (hrv. stupanj), koji svakoj preporuci pripisuje stupanj s obzirom na sigurnost sveukupnih dokaza te snagu. (4) Gdje je to bilo primjereno skupina za izradu smjernica unijela je nestupnjevan savjet za kliničku praksu, a koji nije proistekao iz pregleda sustavnih dokaza. Kliničke praktične smjernice iz 2019. godine specifično pokrivaju peritransplantacijske i poslijetransplantacijske aspekte arterijsko-venskih (AV) fistula i umetaka (graftova). Drugi dio, koji je bio u nastajanju kada su ove smjernice išle u tisak, pokrit će aspekte izbora krvožilnog pristupa, prijeoperacijske procjene krvnih žila i središnje venske katetere. Unatoč nedostatku dokaza velike sigurnosti za većinu područja krvožilnih pristupa, ERBP se posvetio izradi smjernica velike kakvoće, dajući smjernicu gdje god je moguće, a popis preporuka za istraživanje ondje gdje se nije moglo uputiti smjernicom. Nadamo se da će ove smjernice i one planirane pomoći stručnoj zajednici pri donošenju odluka o postupcima, postupnicima i skrbi vezanima s krvožilnim pristupima, pomoći bolesnicima i onima koji se za njih brinu da steknu uvid u problematiku te olakšati zajedničko donošenje odluka u tom području

Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy

BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, but few effective long-term treatments are available. In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS In this double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease to receive canagliflozin, an oral SGLT2 inhibitor, at a dose of 100 mg daily or placebo. All the patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 30 to &lt;90 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area and albuminuria (ratio of albumin [mg] to creatinine [g], &gt;300 to 5000) and were treated with renin–angiotensin system blockade. The primary outcome was a composite of end-stage kidney disease (dialysis, transplantation, or a sustained estimated GFR of &lt;15 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), a doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes. Prespecified secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically. RESULTS The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee. At that time, 4401 patients had undergone randomization, with a median follow-up of 2.62 years. The relative risk of the primary outcome was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group, with event rates of 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.82; P=0.00001). The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, a doubling of the creatinine level, or death from renal causes was lower by 34% (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P&lt;0.001), and the relative risk of end-stage kidney disease was lower by 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P=0.002). The canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P=0.01) and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P&lt;0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of amputation or fracture. CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, the risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular events was lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 2.62 years

The Utility of the Mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination as a Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Background/Aims: We tested the utility of the Mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) in a cohort of older adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes. Method: The M-ACE was administered to 112 CKD and diabetes patients attending a nephrology clinic. Cognitive impairment was based upon patient, informant, and case review, neuropsychological assessment, and application of criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition for dementia. The M-ACE was also compared to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results: Upon assessment, 52 patients had normal cognitive function, 33 had MCI, and 27 had dementia. The area under the receiver operating curve for the M-ACE was 0.96 (95% CI 0.95–1.00). The sensitivity and specificity for a dementia diagnosis were 0.96 and 0.84 at the cut point &#x3c;25 and 0.70 and 1.00 at the cut point &#x3c;21. Mean M-ACE scores differed significantly between normal, demented, and MCI groups (p &#x3c; 0.001), and compared to the MMSE, the M-ACE did not suffer from ceiling effects. Conclusion: The M-ACE is an easily administered test with good sensitivity and specificity to capture and assist in the diagnosis of MCI or dementia in patients with CKD and diabetes

Prospective Audit to Study urokinaSe use to restore Patency in Occluded centRal venous caTheters (PASSPORT 1).

OBJECTIVES Tunnelled central venous catheters dysfunction can be defined as failure to provide blood flow above 200 mL/min during dialysis often caused by thrombosis. Although urokinase is used routinely for thrombolysis, there is wide variation in dose regimens. A multidisciplinary group was formed to address this issue and offer guidance. METHODS Dialysis centres that used urokinase in the United Kingdom took part in a prospective study to determine the safety and outcomes of thrombolysis using agreed protocols. Data were collected anonymously from September 2017 until February 2018. Catheter blood flow was measured before and after the following interventions: catheter dwell or push locks with 12,500-50,000 IU or catheter infusion with 100,000-250,000 IU of urokinase. Interventions were repeated if the blood flow remained below 200 mL/min. RESULTS 10 centres took part and recruited 200 patients; 45.5% were female and 54.5% were male with mean age of 63.6 (±15.2) years. The cumulative success rate for thrombolysis was 90.5% after first intervention, 97% after second intervention, and 99% after more than 2 interventions. Although there was trend towards benefit with dose increments, the success rate between push/dwell locks and high-dose infusion of urokinase was not significantly different (p = 0.069). Seventeen (8.5%) tunnelled central venous catheters were removed due to failure of treatment. No urokinase-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION In this study, urokinase was safe and efficacious; there was no difference between dwell and push locks. There was some benefit with high-dose infusion of urokinase compared to the dwell and push lock