5 research outputs found

    Advantages of Tissue Level Implants in Case of Alveolar Ridge and Mucosal Atrophy

    Get PDF
    In the modern market, there is a great variety of dental implants, which differ from each other in design, geometry, connection type, surface treatment technology, etc. However, the most fundamental and main differentiating component between implants is how the implants are inserted into the bone and how it is positioned in relation to the soft tissues. Accordingly, they are divided into sunken, i.e., bone-level implants, and non-sunken, i.e., tissue-level implants, in which case the implant-abutment connection, or interface, is located at the gum level. This study shows the advantages of tissue-level implants in the case of atrophy of the alveolar ridge and also studies the comparison of bone lost in the case of bone-level implants and tissue-level implants

    Advantages of Tissue Level Implants in Case of Alveolar Ridge and Mucosal Atrophy

    Get PDF
    In the modern market, there is a great variety of dental implants, which differ from each other in design, geometry, connection type, surface treatment technology, etc. However, the most fundamental and main differentiating component between implants is how the implants are inserted into the bone and how it is positioned concerning the soft tissues. Accordingly, they are divided into sunken, i.e., bone level implants and non-sunken, i.e., tissue level implants, in which case the implant-abutment connection, or interface, is located at the gum level. This study shows advantages of tissue level - implants in atrophy of the alveolar ridge, also studies comparison of bone loss in case of bone - level implants and tissue level implants

    Advantages of Tissue Level Implants in Case of Alveolar Ridge and Mucosal Atrophy

    Get PDF
    In the modern market, there is a great variety of dental implants, which differ from each other in design, geometry, connection type, surface treatment technology, etc. However, the most fundamental and main differentiating component between implants is how the implants are inserted into the bone and how it is positioned in relation to the soft tissues. Accordingly, they are divided into sunken, i.e., bone-level implants, and non-sunken, i.e., tissue-level implants, in which case the implant-abutment connection, or interface, is located at the gum level. This study shows the advantages of tissue-level implants in the case of atrophy of the alveolar ridge and also studies the comparison of bone lost in the case of bone-level implants and tissue-level implants

    Immediate Loading of Dental Implants with Fixed Prosthodontic Constructions Advantages and Methods

    Get PDF
    “Immediate loading of implants” implies loading of implants after extraction of a tooth. The goal of our study was to observe the loss of keratinized gums and bone tissue in the region surrounding the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction, and to compare it to the immediate loading of dental implants with the same indicator. Recently, immediate implant placement after the extraction of a tooth with early loading has become more common. The advantages of this procedure include fewer surgical interventions, reduction in overall treatment time, reduced soft and hard tissue loss, and psychological satisfaction for the patient. This study shows the advantages and methods for immediate implant placement with immediate provisional restorations

    Immediate Loading of Dental Implants with Fixed Prosthodontic Constructions Advantages and Methods

    Get PDF
    “Immediate loading of implants” implies loading of implants after extraction of a tooth. The goal of our study was to observe the loss of keratinized gums and bone tissue in the region surrounding the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction, and to compare it to the immediate loading of dental implants with the same indicator. Recently, immediate implant placement after the extraction of a tooth with early loading has become more common. The advantages of this procedure include fewer surgical interventions, reduction in overall treatment time, reduced soft and hard tissue loss, and psychological satisfaction for the patient. This study shows the advantages and methods for immediate implant placement with immediate provisional restorations
    corecore