13 research outputs found
KarriÀrvÀgledning pÄ estetiska programmet - En kvalitativ studie i hur elever pÄ estetiska programmet rustas för det eftergymnasiala studie- och yrkeslivet
Syftet med vÄrt examensarbete Àr att undersöka hur och med vilka verktyg vÄrt urval av vÀgledare och lÀrare arbetar med att rusta elever pÄ estetiska programmet för framtida studie- och yrkesliv, i förhÄllande till elevernas karriÀrmÄl/drömmar. KarriÀr-mÄl/drömmar som kan rikta sig mot den, enligt Arbetsförmedlingens yrkesprognos, svÄretablerade arbetsmarknaden inom kulturbranschen.
Vi har genom en kvalitativ metod intervjuat fyra studie- och yrkesvÀgledare samt tvÄ lÀrare pÄ gymnasieskolans estetiska program. Vi har dÀrefter analyserat resultatet genom relevanta begrepp tagna frÄn kapitlet tidigare forskning samt Social cognitive career theory och begreppen upplevd sjÀlvförmÄga (self-efficacy), personliga mÄl (personal goals), och förvÀntade utfall (outcome expectation. Vidare har vi analyserar resultatet utifrÄn Sociodynamic Counselling: a practical approach to meaning making och begreppen verktyg, att konstruera sin egen framtid (future buildning), empowerment och att konstruera tillsammans (joint action). Vi anvÀnder Àven begreppen utvidga (pushing up), begrÀnsa (cooling out) samt institutionell aktör i syfte att analysera resultatet av vÄr empiri.
VÄrt resultat visar pÄ att majoriteten av vÄra respondenter har ett uppmuntrande förhÄllningssÀtt mot eleverna och deras karriÀrmÄl/drömmar att arbeta inom kultur-branschen. Det samverkas dock inte kring arbetet med att rusta eleverna för vÀgarna vidare efter gymnasiet men vÀgledare och lÀrare kompletterar varandra omedvetet genom att vÀgledare rustar dem inför eftergymnasiala studier och lÀrare inför ett kommande arbetsliv. Sammanfattningsvis har vi genom analysen kommit fram till att vi ser att det kan vara en balansgÄng för vÀgledare och lÀrare att vara uppmuntrande mot elevernas val av framtida karriÀr och samtidigt fÄ dem att drömma realistiskt. Detta utan att uppfattas som institutionella aktörer som begrÀnsar vad eleverna ser som möjligt att uppnÄ utifrÄn vad professionerna sjÀlva ser som förnuftigt
Stem-based peptides inhibit both RVFV and VSV.
<p>Peptides were screened for inhibition of the pseudotyped reporter viruses RVF-VSV-luc (A and C) and VSV-luc (B and D). Virus was incubated with peptide RVFV-6, -7, -8, -9, or -10 (A, B) or serial dilutions of RVFV-6, RVFV-10, or the scrambled peptides RVFV-6sc or RVFV-10sc (C, D) prior to infecting a monolayer of Vero E6 cells. Luciferase activity (RLU) was measured approximately 18 h later. Percent inhibition was calculated based on the virus-only controls. Error shown is the standard deviation of the mean. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments.</p
RVFV-6 does not prevent virus from binding to cells.
<p>RVFV-MP12 (A) or EboZ-eGFP (B) was incubated with 50 ”M RVFV-6 prior to the addition to a confluent monolayer of Vero E6 cells. After a 1 h adsorption, cells were rinsed with PBS, and RNA was harvested using TRIzol. Real time RT-PCR was conducted in triplicate to quantify the relative amount of viral RNA bound to cells, and results are combined from duplicate experiments. NTC is the no template control, PC (positive control) is RNA purified from either RVFV-MP12 or EboZ-eGFP. Untreated virus was mock treated without peptide. Error shown is the standard deviation of the mean.</p
RVFV-6 binds to cells independent of RVFV GnGc expression.
<p>Vero E6 cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing RVFV GnGc. Forty-eight h later, either the biotin-labeled RVFV-6 peptide or the biotin-labeled RVFV-6sc peptide was added to the cells followed by washing with PBS. Cells were fixed, and peptide binding was identified using an anti-biotin antibody conjugated to Texas Red. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue).</p
Molecular hypothesis of RVFV-6 mechanism of action.
<p>Panel A shows the initial stages of the membrane fusion process in bunyaviruses (adapted from <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002430#pntd.0002430-Garry1" target="_blank">[8]</a>). Receptor-binding triggers uptake of virions by endocytosis. Acidification of the endocytic vesicle likely initiates Gn/Gc dissociation. Conformational rearrangements of domains I and II in Gc lead to trimer formation and insertion of the fusion peptide into the endosomal vesicle membrane. Trimer formation exposes the stem binding sites (shown in black) with affinity for the Gc stem and RVFV-6. The main molecular elements involved are: (<i>I</i>) glycoprotein Gc having four main components including [<i>a</i>] domains DI, DII, and DIII shown in green, orange/yellow, and blue, respectively; [<i>b</i>] the fusion loop shown in red; [<i>c</i>] the stem shown as small red cylinders; and [<i>d</i>] the transmembrane domains shown as a magenta cylinder; (<i>II</i>) the glycoprotein Gn, depicted as the receptor-binding protein of bunyaviruses, colored pink; and (<i>III</i>) host-cell receptors, shown in light-blue. Panel B: <i>Zippering action:</i> After acidification of the endocytic vesicle, the stem regions relocate, moving towards the host membrane through a zippering reaction. Docking of the stems into the stem binding sites is an essential step of membrane fusion that leads to opening of a pore or channel. <i>RVFV-6 blocking:</i> RVFV-6 molecules, shown as green cylinders, outcompete the stem fragment and lead to inhibition of fusion by blocking the movement of the native stem. Panel C: Molecular model of the RVFV Gc trimer complex. A molecular surface is used to highlight the three domains of the protein (colored as indicated in A). The stem fragments are shown as a red α-helices docked into the stem binding sites (black surface areas), and stem residues are highlighted using a stick representation.</p
Activation of the viral fusion process is required for RVFV-6 binding to RVFV Gc.
<p>Biotin-conjugated RVFV-6, RVFV-6sc, or no peptide was pre-bound to avidin beads before the addition of RVFV-MP12. Beads were washed to remove unbound virus and treated as indicated with 1) lysis buffer and wash, 2) pH 5.2 treatment followed by lysis buffer and wash, or 3) no pH 5.2 treatment and no lysis buffer. Protein bound to the avidin beads were resolved by SDS-PAGE and probed with the anti-RVFV Gc antibody 4D4. Data represent at least 3 separate experiments.</p
Further characterization of the RVFV stem peptides show broad, non-toxic viral inhibition.
<p>Serial dilutions of peptide were incubated with RVFV-ZH501 (A), EboZ-eGFP (B), or ANDV (C), before infecting a monolayer of Vero E6 cells. Percent inhibition was determined for each virus using virus-only controls. (D) MTT toxicity assay results after overnight incubation of Vero E6 cells with RVFV-6 or RVFV-6sc peptides. Absorbance was measured approximately 18 h after adding the diluted peptide in triplicate. The dashed line in (D) represents the average signal generated by the mock treated control cells. Error shown is the standard deviation of the mean. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments.</p