7 research outputs found

    Why Nature Uses Radical SAM Enzymes so Widely: Electron Nuclear Double Resonance Studies of Lysine 2,3-Aminomutase Show the 5′-dAdo• “Free Radical” Is Never Free

    No full text
    Lysine 2,3-aminomutase (LAM) is a radical <i>S</i>-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) enzyme and, like other members of this superfamily, LAM utilizes radical-generating machinery comprising SAM anchored to the unique Fe of a [4Fe-4S] cluster via a classical five-membered N,O chelate ring. Catalysis is initiated by reductive cleavage of the SAM S–C5′ bond, which creates the highly reactive 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical (5′-dAdo•), the same radical generated by homolytic Co–C bond cleavage in B<sub>12</sub> radical enzymes. The SAM surrogate <i>S</i>-3′,4′-anhydroadenosyl-l-methionine (anSAM) can replace SAM as a cofactor in the isomerization of l-α-lysine to l-β-lysine by LAM, via the stable allylic anhydroadenosyl radical (anAdo•). Here electron nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) spectroscopy of the anAdo• radical in the presence of <sup>13</sup>C, <sup>2</sup>H, and <sup>15</sup>N-labeled lysine completes the picture of how the active site of LAM from <i>Clostridium subterminale</i> SB4 “tames” the 5′-dAdo• radical, preventing it from carrying out harmful side reactions: this “free radical” in LAM is never free. The low steric demands of the radical-generating [4Fe-4S]/SAM construct allow the substrate target to bind adjacent to the S–C5′ bond, thereby enabling the 5′-dAdo• radical created by cleavage of this bond to react with its partners by undergoing small motions, ∼0.6 Å toward the target and ∼1.5 Å overall, that are controlled by tight van der Waals contact with its partners. We suggest that the accessibility to substrate and ready control of the reactive C5′ radical, with “van der Waals control” of small motions throughout the catalytic cycle, is common within the radical SAM enzyme superfamily and is a major reason why these enzymes are the preferred means of initiating radical reactions in nature

    Homologous acetone carboxylases select Fe(II) or Mn(II) as the catalytic cofactor

    No full text
    ABSTRACTAcetone carboxylases (ACs) catalyze the metal- and ATP-dependent conversion of acetone and bicarbonate to form acetoacetate. Interestingly, two homologous ACs that have been biochemically characterized have been reported to have different metal complements, implicating different metal dependencies in catalysis. ACs from proteobacteria Xanthobacter autotrophicus and Aromatoleum aromaticum share 68% sequence identity but have been proposed to have different catalytic metals. In this work, the two ACs were expressed under the same conditions in Escherichia coli and were subjected to parallel chelation and reconstitution experiments with Mn(II) or Fe(II). Electron paramagnetic and MĂśssbauer spectroscopies identified signatures, respectively, of Mn(II) or Fe(II) bound at the active site. These experiments showed that the respective ACs, without the assistance of chaperones, second metal sites, or post-translational modifications facilitate correct metal incorporation, and despite the expected thermodynamic preference for Fe(II), each preferred a distinct metal. Catalysis was likewise associated uniquely with the cognate metal, though either could potentially serve the proposed Lewis acidic role. Subtle differences in the protein structure are implicated in serving as a selectivity filter for Mn(II) or Fe(II).IMPORTANCEThe Irving-Williams series refers to the predicted stabilities of transition metal complexes where the observed general stability for divalent first-row transition metal complexes increase across the row. Acetone carboxylases (ACs) use a coordinated divalent metal at their active site in the catalytic conversion of bicarbonate and acetone to form acetoacetate. Highly homologous ACs discriminate among different divalent metals at their active sites such that variations of the enzyme prefer Mn(II) over Fe(II), defying Irving-Williams-predicted behavior. Defining the determinants that promote metal discrimination within the first-row transition metals is of broad fundamental importance in understanding metal-mediated catalysis and metal catalyst design

    Electron Spin Relaxation and Biochemical Characterization of the Hydrogenase Maturase HydF: Insights into [2Fe-2S] and [4Fe-4S] Cluster Communication and Hydrogenase Activation

    No full text
    Nature utilizes [FeFe]-hydrogenase enzymes to catalyze the interconversion between H<sub>2</sub> and protons and electrons. Catalysis occurs at the H-cluster, a carbon monoxide-, cyanide-, and dithiomethylamine-coordinated 2Fe subcluster bridged via a cysteine to a [4Fe-4S] cluster. Biosynthesis of this unique metallocofactor is accomplished by three maturase enzymes denoted HydE, HydF, and HydG. HydE and HydG belong to the radical <i>S</i>-adenosylmethionine superfamily of enzymes and synthesize the nonprotein ligands of the H-cluster. These enzymes interact with HydF, a GTPase that acts as a scaffold or carrier protein during 2Fe subcluster assembly. Prior characterization of HydF demonstrated the protein exists in both dimeric and tetrameric states and coordinates both [4Fe-4S]<sup>2+/+</sup> and [2Fe-2S]<sup>2+/+</sup> clusters [Shepard, E. M., Byer, A. S., Betz, J. N., Peters, J. W., and Broderick, J. B. (2016) <i>Biochemistry 55</i>, 3514–3527]. Herein, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is utilized to characterize the [2Fe-2S]<sup>+</sup> and [4Fe-4S]<sup>+</sup> clusters bound to HydF. Examination of spin relaxation times using pulsed EPR in HydF samples exhibiting both [4Fe-4S]<sup>+</sup> and [2Fe-2S]<sup>+</sup> cluster EPR signals supports a model in which the two cluster types either are bound to widely separated sites on HydF or are not simultaneously bound to a single HydF species. Gel filtration chromatographic analyses of HydF spectroscopic samples strongly suggest the [2Fe-2S]<sup>+</sup> and [4Fe-4S]<sup>+</sup> clusters are coordinated to the dimeric form of the protein. Lastly, we examined the 2Fe subcluster-loaded form of HydF and showed the dimeric state is responsible for [FeFe]-hydrogenase activation. Together, the results indicate a specific role for the HydF dimer in the H-cluster biosynthesis pathway

    Monovalent Cation Activation of the Radical SAM Enzyme Pyruvate Formate-Lyase Activating Enzyme

    Get PDF
    Pyruvate formate-lyase activating enzyme (PFL-AE) is a radical <i>S</i>-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) enzyme that installs a catalytically essential glycyl radical on pyruvate formate-lyase. We show that PFL-AE binds a catalytically essential monovalent cation at its active site, yet another parallel with B<sub>12</sub> enzymes, and we characterize this cation site by a combination of structural, biochemical, and spectroscopic approaches. Refinement of the PFL-AE crystal structure reveals Na<sup>+</sup> as the most likely ion present in the solved structures, and pulsed electron nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) demonstrates that the same cation site is occupied by <sup>23</sup>Na in the solution state of the as-isolated enzyme. A SAM carboxylate-oxygen is an M<sup>+</sup> ligand, and EPR and circular dichroism spectroscopies reveal that both the site occupancy and the identity of the cation perturb the electronic properties of the SAM-chelated iron–sulfur cluster. ENDOR studies of the PFL-AE/[<sup>13</sup>C-methyl]-SAM complex show that the target sulfonium positioning varies with the cation, while the observation of an isotropic hyperfine coupling to the cation by ENDOR measurements establishes its intimate, SAM-mediated interaction with the cluster. This monovalent cation site controls enzyme activity: (i) PFL-AE in the absence of any simple monovalent cations has little–no activity; and (ii) among monocations, going down Group 1 of the periodic table from Li<sup>+</sup> to Cs<sup>+</sup>, PFL-AE activity sharply maximizes at K<sup>+</sup>, with NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> closely matching the efficacy of K<sup>+</sup>. PFL-AE is thus a type I M<sup>+</sup>-activated enzyme whose M<sup>+</sup> controls reactivity by interactions with the cosubstrate, SAM, which is bound to the catalytic iron–sulfur cluster
    corecore